similar to: How to get % and subscript in plotmath

Hi all I know GLMMGibbs is still in beta but has anyone experienced (and solved ;-) this problem? I decided to look at the seeds example but I get a core dump on two intel linux boxes and also a sun workstation. All are running R1.3.0 but different hardware/OS's so I think I've done something wrong > library(GLMMGibbs) > data(seeds) > seeds$plate <- as.factor(1:21) >

While termplot is under discussion, here's another proposal. I'd like to change the default for partial.resid to TRUE, and for smooth to panel.smooth. I'd be surprised if those changes were to break existing code. John Maindonald email: john.maindonald at anu.edu.au phone : +61 2 (6125)3473 fax : +61 2(6125)5549 Centre for Mathematics & Its Applications, Room

My apologies for he very short time before things close, but it's not my fault. If necessary get your hat in the ring by Friday and see to the niceties later, may I suggest. This is a vacancy in my group in Cleveland. The work is interesting and the challenges large. Bill Venables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division of Marine Research

I see Peter has just announced the release of 1.0.0, on time, even here in Australia, in accordance with a timetable privately announced about 6 months ago. At that time it seemed optimistic to put it mildly. I am not a member of the core team, but as an ordinary user of R with a more privileged inside view than most I'd like to offer my personal congratulations and thanks. This is the

Brian, Thanks for doing this. As the primary author, could I have a desk copy, please? Bill Venables. Bill Venables, CMIS, CSIRO Marine Laboratories, PO Box 120, Cleveland, Qld. 4163 AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 7 3826 7251 Fax: +61 7 3826 7304 Mobile: +61 419 634 642 <mailto: Bill.Venables at csiro.au> http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/ -----Original Message----- From: Brian

I seem to have unwittingly stirred up a hornets' nest here, so let me have one more say and leave it. Firstly, congratulations to Renaud Launcelot, who seems to have a better feel for wryness and irony in English than some of my native speaker colleagues. Of course R A Fisher is a seminal writer, indeed close to the founder of modern statistics and every aspiring statistician should read

Does anyone have, or has anyone ever considered making, a version of 'termplot' that allows the user to specify that all plots should have the same y-limits? This seems a natural thing to ask for, as the plots share a y-scale. If you don't have the same y-axes you can easily misread the comparative contributions of the different components. Notes: the current version of termplot

Does anyone have, or has anyone ever considered making, a version of 'termplot' that allows the user to specify that all plots should have the same y-limits? This seems a natural thing to ask for, as the plots share a y-scale. If you don't have the same y-axes you can easily misread the comparative contributions of the different components. Notes: the current version of termplot

I recently took "." off my PATH for security reasons and now find that R does not work in my home directory where the .Renviron file resides. The fix is simple. In the R shell startup section replace ". .Renviron" by ". ./.Renviron". The relevant section is: # Startup if ${USE_R_ENVIRON}; then # use the one in current dir, or default if [ -r .Renviron ] then .

I found writing the following default method the for the generic function "julian" causes R to crash. julian.default <- function(x, ...) { x <- as.Date(x) NextMethod("julian", x, ...) } Here is a test example > m <- as.Date("1972-09-27") + 0:10 > m [1] "1972-09-27" "1972-09-28" "1972-09-29"

Peter, There is a clear and simple bug in glm() that I have noticed in 0.64.2 (Windows and Unix) but may have been present in earlier versions. The function starts as follows: > glm function (formula, family = gaussian, data = list(), weights = NULL, subset = NULL, na.action = na.fail, start = NULL, offset = NULL, control = glm.control(...), model = TRUE, method =

> -----Original Message----- > From: Cobalt [mailto:grosso at mail.ru] > Sent: Friday, 29 December 2000 7:23 > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] anova > > > > ..Hello, Well Hello, whoever you are. (In this list anonymous messages are considered rather impolite. Next time please submit your message under your real name as a gesture of good faith. For this

If you would like a 10 second R puzzle, you might like to think about this one: > g <- expand.grid(long = 130:140, lat = -(10:25)) > gp <- transform(g, x = long, y = lat) Error in transform(g, x = long, y = lat) : object "long" not found I don't expect this hasn't come up before, but I can't find mention of it. I suggest that to minimise this little

> I think we should get rid of source attributes completely, > since they are no longer needed, but your comment still > applies to source references. We should strip them when code > gets modified. > > Duncan Murdoch I would be very concerned about losing source attributes-- it would break a lot of my code :(! It's very useful to have a single portable R object that

Hi I apologise for this question as it really must be a FAQ. Unfortunately, I can't find the answer and I'm tired of looking at endless google results A colleague of mine works for a state government department that has a policy against open source software or software tainted by open source. Other government departments in the same state use R but this particular department is driven

At 18:26 14/10/00 +0100, Prof Brian D Ripley wrote: >On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, niels Waller wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> I suspect there is a simple answer to this question -- but I cannot find it. >> >> Suppose I have a list of matrices. I want to pull out an element (such as >> row 1, col 2) from each matrix. Do I need a loop to do this? Or is there

We noticed this bug in more complex code, but this succinctly describes the phenomenon. If you do not re-initialize a each time in the following loop, the final value only is assigned to all places when the loop is complete. > a <- b <- list() > for(i in 1:5) { + a$alpha <- i + b[[i]] <- a + } > unlist(b) alpha alpha alpha alpha alpha 5 5 5 5 5 If a is

I've noticed an increasing tendency for people to use '=' rather than the older '<-' symbol. When '=' became available as an assignment operator in S-PLUS in the late '90s my first reaction was to switch to it as well. Brian Ripley warned me that it was not a good idea. As usual he was right, but it took a couple of pretty serious finger-burning episodes

Peter, I thought this one was noted and fixed, but I could be wrong. R : Copyright 1999, The R Development Core Team Version 0.63.3 (March 6, 1999) .... [Previously saved workspace restored] > tabulate(1:10, 5) Process R:1 segmentation fault at Sat Apr 3 17:48:34 1999 -- (The following contact details become official on 1 May 1999, but the email

I have just become painfully aware that objects of class "difftime", generated by the difference of two POSIXct objects, carry a "units" attribute, which flashes by when the object is printed, for example. The pain was occasioned when I tried to turn these objects into numberic objects for use elsewhere as a covariate. as.numeric(difftime object) simply turns off the units