similar to: Funny warning message

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Funny warning message"

1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine (and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under 0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux installations. I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q or rpm
1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine (and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under 0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux installations. I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q or rpm
1999 Mar 11
3
R and kron
I note that the CRAN at .at land still refers to 0.63.2. Is this just a typo? I don't want to download a whole lot only to find I still have it! Does 0.63.3 live elsewhere? And I note the new function kronecker - very useful but can it be applied to non-numerics as in factors, data frames etc preserving the class, levels and names? John
1999 Mar 11
3
R and kron
I note that the CRAN at .at land still refers to 0.63.2. Is this just a typo? I don't want to download a whole lot only to find I still have it! Does 0.63.3 live elsewhere? And I note the new function kronecker - very useful but can it be applied to non-numerics as in factors, data frames etc preserving the class, levels and names? John
1999 Jan 12
4
RH5.2 bundle
Hello and Happy New R Two points: 1 Noting the existence of 0.63.2 as a tgz file on CRAN, but being careful or lazy depending on how you want to see it, I also note that the binaries for Redhat stop at 0.63.1 on RH 5.1. I recently got the RH 5.2 Power Tools where I was pleased to see R 0.62.4 included, lots of libraries including V&R. This had been compiled into an rpm - does anyone know
1999 Jan 12
4
RH5.2 bundle
Hello and Happy New R Two points: 1 Noting the existence of 0.63.2 as a tgz file on CRAN, but being careful or lazy depending on how you want to see it, I also note that the binaries for Redhat stop at 0.63.1 on RH 5.1. I recently got the RH 5.2 Power Tools where I was pleased to see R 0.62.4 included, lots of libraries including V&R. This had been compiled into an rpm - does anyone know
1998 Nov 13
3
SuSE package
Hi Is there a SuSE binary package for R 0.64? John -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
1999 Apr 02
4
PLATFORMS Update
NAME Douglas Bates EMAIL bates@stat.wisc.edu VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux SYSTEM Debian 2.1 CC/FC/MAKE egcs/g77/make NAME Martyn Plummer EMAIL plummer@iarc.fr VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM i386-unknown-linux SYSTEM Redhat 5.1 CC/FC/MAKE gcc/egcs-g77/make NAME Göran Broström EMAIL gb@stat.umu.se VERSION 0.63.3 PLATFORM
1999 Nov 24
2
scan error (PR#342)
It seems to me the following should work (in fact, it comes from someone's SPlus file). Instead, it reads the first 8 lines and then spits out syntax errors. Using nlines=36 works. Using nmax does not. Intel RH5.2 with R90.0. Debugging shows it must be internal. Jim junk <- scan(file="",list(i=0,r1=0,r2=0,lull="",day=""),n=5*36) 1 3 5 no 1 2 1
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I get the following message Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171 and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the line 1589 and it works.
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I get the following message Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171 and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the line 1589 and it works.
1998 Dec 16
2
NT domains and 1.9.18pSomething
Hi, I'm trying to replace an NT SBS box with a RH5.2 box, and things are proceeding quite well, save a few samba troubles. I've found that the NT4WS (SP4) clients can log in if told to use a samba machine as a "workgroup", but that they can not find a domain controller if told to use "domain" logons. (They have the registry password encryption hack installed.)
2017 Mar 14
4
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
People, This doesn't seem possible - would it be possible to hack a version of rsync to do it? As an exercise, I want to create a VM image (or at least backup of all the files with rsync) from a SCSI drive in an old Red Hat (NOT Enterprise) v5.2 Linux 486 machine (circa 1999 that does have rsync on it but it has protocol problems talking my server). The 486 has: - an ISA Adaptec 1542
2001 Mar 16
1
Reading images ...
Is there a way to read a (for example) postscript (or tiff, jpg, whatever) file into R and plot it using the R fundamentals? I want to incorporate a drawing in an R plot and I can't see a way of doing this at the moment. TIA John -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send
1999 Mar 26
1
Array indexing
I want to pick out a single member for each row of a matrix according to an indexing vector and I would have thought this was a simple operation. Is it that I am too stuck in Fortran for my own good (so wots rong with fortran?), but is there a better way of doing what to me is intuitive but gives completely the wrong answer. The following result occurs: a<-kronecker(1:4,t(11:15)) # Gives
1999 May 11
1
model.matrix crashes (PR#189)
With 0.64.1 on Intel RH5.2, abc <- list() abc$abc$abc <- matrix(1:20) mt <- terms(~(abc$abc$abc[,1]==64)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==65)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==75) |(abc$abc$abc[,1]==84)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==85)) model.matrix(mt,model.frame(mt)) crashes. With ab$ab$ab, it does not. Apparently, the bug I reported for 0.64.0 has just been pushed back one step. Jim
1999 Nov 29
1
rbind crash (PR#351)
Well here is my (first) segmentation fault for this version (R0.90.0) on Intel RH5.2: x <- matrix(0,nrow=1,ncol=3) y <- c(0.1,10,0.01) rbind(x,y) Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the
1999 Dec 17
1
lists of functions (PR#377)
The following works: list(function() 1, function() 2) but this does not: z <- list() zz[[1]] <- function() 1 giving an "incompatible types" error. The second procedure works with other types of objects. Intel RH5.2 with R90.1. Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read
2000 Jan 25
1
core dump involving function closure (PR#402)
A user has crashed R90.1 on MS Windows by succesive calls to two of my formula/function interpretors in an order that I had not foreseen. I have checked and this also occurs with Intel RH5.2. I have distilled the problem down to its bare bones as the following set of instructions: func <- function(.mu){ .ch1 <- deparse(.mu,width=500)[-1] .fn <-
1999 Nov 16
3
Inf in expression (PR#326)
I was getting worried. 0.65 is the first version that I had not been able to crash. Well the following gives a seg fault on Intel RH5.2 with R0.65.1: plot(rnorm(20),xlab=expression(mu[Inf])) You can guess what I was trying to do, as I used infty first and that did not work. (I now know the correct formula.) Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-