similar to: R 68.3 on OSF V4.0 problems

I wrote about my problems building R-0.63.3 on a Digital Alpha running OSF V4.0D. Thanks to the suggestion Jonathan.Yuen at tvs.slu.se, I tried using the DEC CC compiler instead of gcc, and it worked just fine. (Seeing that I needed gmake to build, it never occured to me to try DEC CC. It seems that you cannot combine DEC F77 with gcc; I do not have g77 to try.) Below is a set of instructions

Hello, With regards to Peter's comment, I got R to compile on OSF 4.0C, though I'm a little behind on versions. I only have 0.63.3 and haven't found anything newer... All kidding regarding typos aside, I went through that floating point exception business on the Alpha and I just didn't have time to make it work. Someone tipped me on to f2c, which I had used with my (old gcc

Hi, I've just committed a few changes to the R make process, such that we support the standard ./configure make make install triple from now on. It should be included in tomorrows snapshot sources. The default installation directory hierarchy should be /usr/local on most systems, but this may vary. The installation prefix can be set using ./configure --prefix=3D... and you can see

Can anyone help? I am trying to install R-0.62.2 on a Sun with OS 5.6 (Solaris 2.6), and gcc/f77. Unfortunatley the simple commands ./configure --prefix=/opt/R make did not work, complaining when building help/docs. It claims to have problems perl (which has worked fine so far) but in practice it is not only a documentation problem: if I force "make install" and run R, then it

Dear Team, Don't understand output below. Please advise. Windows98 and rw1041(patched) from 1/25/02. Graham Lawrence C:\>PATH=C:\bin;C:\mingw32;C:\Perl;C:\HtmlWork;C:\R\rw1041\bin;C:\Tcl;C:\Tcl\bin C:\>Rcmd INSTALL C:\R\lattice_0.4-0.tar.gz Bad command or file name C:\>Rcmd C:\>Rcmd Install Bad command or file name C:\>dir C:\R\rw1041\bin Volume in drive C has no

First I tried 'setenv R_SHELL /usr/local/bin/bash', as bash is the weapon of choice for the faculty wishing to use R, then ran ./configure as before. The ./configure output line using as R_SHELL for scripts ... /usr/local/bin/bash would seem to indicate that the R_SHELL environment variable was recognized and acknowledged. However, I got the same build error: gnumake[2]: Entering

Dear R users, I am having problems building R packages in Windows xp. I have followed the instructions from Peter E. Rossi in Documentation -> Other, except for the TeX version (fpTeX), since when I go to the recommended webpage, it is said that fpTeX has been discontinued. I have MikTeX in my computer, and I have followed the recommendations in

Dear List, I have just compiled my first R library for submission to CRAN; however, I have a tiny problem with 'R CMD check' that is holding me back. I have read extensively the PDF document on Writing R Extensions and the 'Making R Packages Under Windows' tutorial by P. Rossi. All functions are given in R code (no C/C++/Fortran) with two very simple demonstration datasets. My

I've rolled up R-2.9.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is a maintenance release and fixes a number of mostly minor issues. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.9.2.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course (Duncan Murdoch is out of town, so Windows

I've rolled up R-2.9.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is a maintenance release and fixes a number of mostly minor issues. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.9.2.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course (Duncan Murdoch is out of town, so Windows

Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote: >> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes: >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: >>> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I >>> |

On 29 Oct 2015, at 10:44 , Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote: > Out of interest: What is the magic ~R CMD~ is doing? Is it documented > anywhere? R is open source.... (and shell scripts are considered self-documenting by some) On Unix-alikes, R is a shell script which, if called with 1st argument CMD, calls ${R_HOME}/bin/Rcmd, which is another shell script that ends with

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote: > Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes: > >> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: >> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I >> | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One >> |

Hi, I directed somebody to install R (2.6.1) on his OSX computer, following instructions from http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx. She can run R from the console. But plot(1:10) doesn't produce any output or open a window (as I am used to from linux). More importantly: Rscript is not in the path (minor problem ln -s is hopefully doable). I tried to put a hardcoded path to Rscript into the

Hi, FWIW: /* Taken from R/src/main/unique.c */ static int requal(SEXP x, int i, SEXP y, int j) { if (i < 0 || j < 0) return 0; if (!ISNAN(REAL(x)[i]) && !ISNAN(REAL(y)[j])) return (REAL(x)[i] == REAL(y)[j]); else if (R_IsNA(REAL(x)[i]) && R_IsNA(REAL(y)[j])) return 1; else if (R_IsNaN(REAL(x)[i]) && R_IsNaN(REAL(y)[j])) return 1;

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes: > On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: > | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I > | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One > | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more > | generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are

On 9/29/19 1:09 PM, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I spotted that R_isNA and R_IsNaN could be improved when applied on a > vector where we could take out small part of their logic, run it once, > and then reuse inside the loop. Dear Jan, Looking at your examples, I just see you have hand-inlined R_IsNA/R_IsNaN, or is there anything more? In principle we could put

Hi your guys, Recently, I installed R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 with 64 bits environment; I already have following software installed on AIX before I compile R-1.9.1 source codes: g++ 2.9.aix51.020209-4 The GNU C++ compiler and headers gcc 2.9.aix51.020209-4 The GNU gcc C compiler and headers xlf XL Fortran for AIX perl 5.6.1-2 zlib 1.1.3-10 For latex and makeinfo stuffs, I have

Dear R developers, I spotted that R_isNA and R_IsNaN could be improved when applied on a vector where we could take out small part of their logic, run it once, and then reuse inside the loop. I setup tiny plain-C experiment. Taking R_IsNA, R_IsNaN from R's arithmetic.c, and building R_vIsNA and R_vIsNaN accordingly. For double input of size 1e9 (having some NA and NaN) I observed following

Guido: Thank you so much for this, but I wonder, when there is a new release of R, how can I know which packages in contrib need to be re-compiled? I still have all the .zip files from 1.1.0 on my hard drive here, but I am unsure whether to install them under 1.1.1. Thanks for your help. Tom Richards > -----Original Message----- > From: Guido Masarotto [mailto:guido at