similar to: Eyeball problem ...

Some might have noticed that REvolution Computing released the doSMP package to the general public about a month and a half ago, which allows multiple cores to be accessed for parallel computation in R. Some of our physical habitat calculations were taking an extraordinary amount of time to complete and required over-weekend runs, which prompted our interest in this package. What follows

>>> TL;DR: please try the patch out and report if it causes "Did not receive >>> identification string" log messages. I believe it does not. Aw crap. My homegrown anti-dos tool for ssh looks for either DNRIS or if logging is verbose enough a connection that didn't result in a login. I give the attacker a few tries and whitelist any successful candidate so I

I see that back in 2018 there was a proposed patch to implement RFC 8305 aka happy eyeballs. Did that go anywhere? Basically, did 8305 get into OpenSSH? If not, would there be any interest in a new patch for it? Chris

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Chris Rapier wrote: > I see that back in 2018 there was a proposed patch to implement RFC 8305 aka > happy eyeballs. Did that go anywhere? Basically, did 8305 get into OpenSSH? If > not, would there be any interest in a new patch for it? I don't remember the patch and AFAIK it didn't go in

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 11:44, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Chris Rapier wrote: > > > I see that back in 2018 there was a proposed patch to implement RFC 8305 > aka > > happy eyeballs. Did that go anywhere? Basically, did 8305 get into > OpenSSH? If > > not, would there be any interest in a new patch for it? > > I

On 2/13/25 19:57, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 11:44, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org > <mailto:djm at mindrot.org>> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Chris Rapier wrote: > > > I see that back in 2018 there was a proposed patch to implement > RFC 8305 aka > > happy eyeballs. Did that go anywhere? Basically, did 8305

I apologize for abusing the list somewhat but there is some connection to R. Several of the example files in the knitr package for R use the tufte-handout class, which, AFAICS, is not available in Ubuntu or Debian packages (please correct me if I am wrong). The source files are available at tufte-latex.googlecode.com (a.k.a. code.google.com/p/tufte-latex) and I presume they should end up in a

I've experienced GCC induced eyeball-clawing.... Not pretty! On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Sunday 05 April 2009 06:33:00 Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > > FYI, > > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 > > > > -Rajika > > LOL: > > "In contrast, every time I look at the GCC

Can someone point me to a justification for the design decisions, which seem to be similar in lattice and ggplot2, of (1) gray backgrounds and (2) filled points? [I seem to remember seeing somewhere the opposite recommendation for points, i.e. that open points make it much easier to see if there are overlapping values -- and this would be a reason that pch=1 gives an open circle ...] cheers

Hi all, Below is a URL for an editorial published today in our local newspaper, the Minneapolis StarTribune. It was originally published in the Washington Post a couple of days ago: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/29/AR2005082901444.html but that site requires registration. The 'Strib" site seems to be open for the moment:

Hello, I use hosts that are dual stack configured (IPv4 and IPv6) and it happens that connectivity through one or the other is broken and timeouts. In these case connection to the SSH server can take quite some time as ssh waits for the first address to timeout before trying the next. So I gave a stab at implementing RFC 8305. This patch implements part of it in sshconnect.c. * It does not do

On Sunday 05 April 2009 06:33:00 Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > FYI, > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 > > -Rajika LOL: "In contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." :-) -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

Gracias por haberte tomado la molestia de indagar. Entiendo que es eso lo que hago en el encabezado YAML, basandome en la explicación del comienzo del punto 3 de acá: https://bookdown.org/yihui/bookdown/output-formats.html Eso mismo, con el documento que propone el propio Yihui (punto 1.2 del mismo libro) no lo consigo compilar a PDF. Y se me hace extrañísimo, porque tampoco me da error ni nada

Según lo entiendo yo, a mí no me funciona. Lo intenté hacer, también, en la consola directamente. Preferiría poder hacerlo en el documento Rmd, pero de momento ni uno ni otro consigo. Si compila lo hace al libro GitBook y listo. Parece imposible. 2018-07-17 20:02 GMT+02:00 Javier Marcuzzi <javier.ruben.marcuzzi en gmail.com> : > Estimado Juan Abasolo > > Yo no lo utilize pero leí

Hi all, Could you please help me? I am looking for books/pointers/resources/tutorials on visualizing complex/big data and on understanding multivariate relations in complicated data. More specifically, we have categorical variables and are interested in how to visualize the categorical data and visualize data conditioned upon categorical values. Could anybody please give me some pointers?

Gracias, Javier, por la paciencia. Soy malo explicándome. Ese ejemplo que me das, que es el que da Yihui Xie, es el que no consigo compilar si no es a GitBook (que es HTML). El mismo Yihui propone en el libro al que nos referimos los dos y el ejemplo en cuestión (referido en el apartado Get Started) modificar el código YAML para compilar en PDF. Efectifvamente, lo que quiero es conseguir que

Hi, I would like to draw a pie chart. I've already tried out the standard pie-function in the GRAPH-package. My question: is there any 'better' function or package to draw a pie chart. For example I would like to draw a 3D pie chart. Dietrich Tissen

Gracias, Victor. Tampoco es eso. Si saco la linea site: bookdown::bookdown_site Me sigue compilando en HTML, pero sin hacerlo en todos los capítulos si no solamente el del index.Rmd que tengo abierto. No puedo explicar cuanto me sorprende! Supongo que tendré algún puntito de alguna i que falta y al ponerlo me parecerá tontería. Pero ahora todavía es MISTERIO. 2018-07-18 11:03 GMT+02:00 Víctor

Hi, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:32:26AM +0000, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: > TL;DR: please try the patch out and report if it causes "Did not receive > identification string" log messages. I believe it does not. It depends on absolute RTT to the target. If you stay local ("< 50ms"), the 250ms offset should reliably avoid DNIS logs. If you happen to connect to Australia

I've successfully plotted (in the plot and abline code below) a simple regression of Lambda1_2 on VV1_2. I then successfully regressed Lambda1_2 on VV1_2, VV1_22 and VV1_212 producing lm2.l. When I go to plot lm2.l using abline I get the warning: "1: In abline(lm2.l, col = "brown", lty = "dotted", lwd = 2) : only using the first two of 4 regression coefficients"