Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "R-beta: installing new packages in window95 version of R"
1997 Sep 15
2
R-alpha: predict.lm -- who ..?
Just a short reminder / question --
We've had one posting
>> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 19:51:20 -0700
>> From: Kung-Sik Chan <kchan@stat.uiowa.edu>
>> To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
>> Subject: R-beta: bug report
with a predict.default that would "work" with (some) lm objects,
and I think it was said that predict.lm "is being" written
(Peter
1997 Dec 19
1
R-beta: a bug in the lm function ?
I ran a function called BoxCox, taken from the book by Venables and
Ripley, for checking the need for power transformation. This function
works fine using the version 0.50 of R, but gives an error message
with version 0.60.
The lm function in version 0.60 is different from that in version 0.50.
Is there a bug in the new lm function?
Kung-Sik Chan
>
1997 Aug 18
1
R-beta: bug report
The following seems to be a bug when I tried to use the predict function.
> forbes
boil.pt pressure log.pressure
[1,] 194.5 20.79 303.4472
[2,] 194.3 20.79 303.4472
[3,] 197.9 22.40 310.9061
[4,] 198.4 22.67 312.1042
[5,] 199.4 23.15 314.1995
[6,] 199.9 23.35 315.0597
[7,] 200.9 23.89 317.3460
[8,] 201.1 23.99
2017 Jan 22
0
os/2 support using Watcom
On 1/22/17, Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/22/17 09:57 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 1/22/17, Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 01/22/17 05:35 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>>> The attached set of patches adds support for OS/2 using Watcom compiler
>>>> (tested with Open Watcom 1.9). My only interest was building a
2017 Jan 22
0
os/2 support using Watcom
On 01/22/17 05:35 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> The attached set of patches adds support for OS/2 using Watcom compiler
> (tested with Open Watcom 1.9). My only interest was building a working
> dll (the last patch in the set adds a makefile for it), therefore I did
> not touch other places: If there is interest, I can do so.
Most of the patches can have s/__EMX__/__OS2__/ excepting the
1998 Jan 01
1
R-beta: R on NT
I'm having trouble with R on NT.
Sept 1 97 version 50 in file rsept works fine, except I can't boost
the memory - either with the menu or with DOS command Rsept -v50
In fact, if I run in DOS command mode (no shortcut) I get NT error
window: errno 1411. But then R runs.
With rseptbeta and rsept31 versions, R starts for a millisecond and then
disappears. I've tried replacing the
2003 Oct 21
2
WATCOM compiled libraries
Hello,
as usual for me with precompiled libraries, the ones of the vorbis-
sdk didn't work for me in WATCOM/Win32, so i compiled them on my own
(vorbis_static.lib / vorbisfile_static.lib - it was possible after
some slight changes like slightly modifiyng the typedef types that
Watcom didn't know)
The libraries work fine so far (like getting the file info), but when
calling ov_read
2005 Jun 07
1
Problems with userPassword when it's base64 encoded
I'm switching from OpenLDAP to the newly released Fedora Directory
Server (formely known as the Netscape Directory Server) as a LDAP
backend for my Samba domain.
I'm now faced with a problem regarding how Fedora DS handles the
userPassword field.
Unlike OpenLDAP it encodes it in base64 so instead of reading
userPassword: {SSHA}0lP+r3Z1NVan7Caf4CG9oSgnTbQRrv/p
it reads:
userPassword::
2013 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] Another missed optimization opportunity?
Hey Scott,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Scott Pakin <pakin at lanl.gov> wrote:
...
>
> Is there some semantic reason that the increments aren't allowed to be
> combined, or is this a missed optimization opportunity in LLVM?
>
>
I believe that the wildcard is the extern keyword.
Since the external symbol isn't resolved until link time, I suspect that it
would be
2017 Jan 22
7
os/2 support using Watcom
The attached set of patches adds support for OS/2 using Watcom compiler
(tested with Open Watcom 1.9). My only interest was building a working
dll (the last patch in the set adds a makefile for it), therefore I did
not touch other places: If there is interest, I can do so.
Regards.
--
O.S.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2008 Apr 01
1
plugin announcement: acts_as_fu
We''ve all seen the job listings. We know what they''re looking for.
Rockstars. Code Monkeys. Rails Ninjas.
And you''re left thinking, "But I''m just a programmer." Well, not
anymore. Today, you become a Rails Kung-Fu Master!
"Not me," you say. "I''ve already tried using all the acts_as_something
plugins and all the something_fu
2013 Apr 24
1
[LLVMdev] Another missed optimization opportunity?
On 4/24/2013 1:35 PM, Cameron McInally wrote:
>
> I believe that the wildcard is the extern keyword.
>
> Since the external symbol isn't resolved until link time, I suspect that
> it would be a legal C program to do something like (maybe the language
> lawyers know better though):
>
> XXX> cat test.c
> extern int x;
>
> int kung( ) {
> return x;
> }
2000 Dec 15
2
Ports
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:06:39 +1100, Michael Smith wrote:
>>I've done a port for OS/2 using Watcom C++, including a simple command line
>>player based on vorbisfile_example.c, which can be downloaded from
>>http://silk.apana.org.au/utils.html
>>It'd be nice if my changes could be commited to CVS, should I just post
>>patches here?
>
>Yes, unless
2015 Jul 06
2
compiler on ms
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:30:35PM -0700, Eric Lindblad wrote:
> I don't know if it would be of any use - and I know that
> the configure script searches for gawk, sed and grep -
> but Watcom has free 32 and 64 bit compilers, and
> the msvc files for Xapian no longer appear to be
> maintained, so perhaps Xapian build files written for
> [Open] Watcom could be made, as such
2008 Aug 22
1
R CMD check problem
I have a query after finding an error running Rtools on a Windows machine.
I am trying to build an update to the R fda library using Rtools27 under
Windows XP Pro. This is the current fda library on RForge:
http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/fda
Following R CMD build, R CMD check produces the following error in
00Install.out:
installing R.css in F:/work/RForge/fda.Rcheck
make: ***
1999 Sep 06
1
Fortran character strings
Has anyone ever successfully used Fortran character strings with R?
?Foreign says
R C Fortran
integer int * integer
....
character char ** [compiler dependent]
Character strings are passed as C arrays of character
strings to Fortran: the first string may be usable if
its length is passed
2007 Feb 02
1
dynamic loading error with Open Watcom object file
Hello. I am trying to use a FORTRAN subroutine from within R (Windows
version). This fortran subroutine is compiled using the Open Watcom Fortran
compiler and the compiled object file is called ritscale.obj. Following the
explanation on pages 193-194 of "The New S language" I use the dyn.load
command:
> dyn.load("f:/maxent/ritscale.obj")
Error in dyn.load(x,
1997 Oct 16
4
R-beta: Time Series Analysis
I have just downloaded rsept.zip and rseptbeta.zip for Windows 95 and I
think that is a GREAT product.
1st: I want to know the differences between them.
2nd: I'm interested very much in time series analysis, but watching the
html help there is not any function (for ex. like the S-Plus functions acf
pacf and arima functions etc). If there is some pacages to plug-in with
documentation
1997 Oct 16
4
R-beta: Time Series Analysis
I have just downloaded rsept.zip and rseptbeta.zip for Windows 95 and I
think that is a GREAT product.
1st: I want to know the differences between them.
2nd: I'm interested very much in time series analysis, but watching the
html help there is not any function (for ex. like the S-Plus functions acf
pacf and arima functions etc). If there is some pacages to plug-in with
documentation
2000 Aug 22
1
External call to Watcom F77 version 11
A colleague is using Watcom F77 version 11 in Windows NT, and wants to
create DLLs callable from R. (He was previously able to do external
calls from S-PLUS). Does anyone know what magic is necessary so that
it uses the right calling convention? In a debugger, it appears it's
using a register-based calling convention, no matter what we ask for,
but we're probably asking in the wrong