similar to: R-beta: Re: S Compatibility

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "R-beta: Re: S Compatibility"

1997 Apr 30
1
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
At 03:28 30/04/97, ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz wrote: >Bill Venables writes: > (As a complete side-issue, Brian Ripley and I have a kind of > convention: we refer to the language as "S" and the commercial > product as "S-PLUS". There is a useful distinction to be made.) > >This is generally what I try to do too. > >However, I suspect though that most
2018 Dec 21
0
formula(model.frame(..)) is misleading
I don't have a copy of SV4 (or SV3, where model.frame was introduced), but S+ 8.3 (based on SV4) puts the class "model.frame" on model.frame()'s return value but has no methods (in the default packages) for class "model.frame". Perhaps that is why R omitted the class. However, S+ 8.3's (and problably S's) formula.data.frame did look for a "terms"
2018 Dec 21
3
formula(model.frame(..)) is misleading
Dear Martin, Since no one else has picked up on this, I?ll take a crack at it: The proposal is to define the S3 class of model-frame objects as c(?model.frame?, ?data.frame?) (not the formal class of these objects, even though this feature was coincidentally introduced in S4). That?s unlikely to do harm, since model frames would still ?inherit? data.frame methods. It's possible that some
2018 Dec 20
1
formula(model.frame(..)) is misleading
When formula() is applied to the output of model.frame() it ignores the formula in the model.frame's 'terms' attribute: > d <- data.frame(A=log(1:6), B=LETTERS[rep(1:2,c(2,4))], C=1/(1:6), D=rep(letters[25:26],c(4,2)), Y=1:6) > m0 <- model.frame(data=d, Y ~ A:B) > formula(m0) Y ~ A + B > `attributes<-`(terms(m0), value=NULL) Y ~ A:B This is in part
1997 Oct 09
0
R-alpha: [sboker@calliope.psych.nd.edu: Re: S-PLUS on UNIX plans]
--Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In case you did not realize how much this is related to R : --Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: s-sender@utstat.toronto.edu From: "Steven M. Boker" <sboker@calliope.psych.nd.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 97 16:37:05 -0500 To: s-news@utstat.toronto.edu Subject:
1999 Jun 29
3
S v. 5
Does R, or will R, be integrating the changes to the Chambers/Lucent S language under their version 5.0? If not already, then when? John Thaden Little Rock, Arkansas, USA -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
2006 Jul 25
1
Multiple tests on repeated measurements
Dear R-helpers: My question is how do I efficient and valid correct for multiple tests in a repeated measurement design: Suppose we measure at two distinct visits with repeated subjects a treatment difference on the same variable. The treatment differences are assessed with a mixed model and adjusted by two methods for multiple tests: # 1. Method: Adjustment with library(multcomp)
1997 May 02
0
R-beta: Splus vs R
> If I were Mathsoft I would be less than pleased > at the development of R and would try to stop it if I could. I would not assume that Mathsoft must have such a negative view towards R. The reasons are roughly summarized by the analogy that a smaller part of a big pie is often better than a bigger part of a small pie. Mathsoft's limited success in addressing the student market has
2001 Jan 24
0
DSC 2001: 2nd CFP
DSC 2001 International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/Conferences/DSC-2001/ March 15--17, 2001 Vienna, Austria The second international workshop on `Distributed Statistical Computing' (DSC 2001) will take place at the Technische Universität Wien in Vienna, Austria from 2001-03-15 to 2001-03-17. This workshop will deal with future directions in
2003 Jun 30
0
** Automatic Reply from Mathsoft Technical Support **
This is an Automatic Reply ********************************** Thank you for e-mailing Mathsoft Technical Support. We offer support for Mathcad 2001i or higher, Axum 6 or higher and the StudyWorks product line. Cumulative Update 1 for Mathcad 11 Now Available! http://www.mathcad.com/download/ Mathcad 2001i Service Release 2 was posted June 2002. New Support Policy: With the release of Mathcad
2001 Sep 13
2
SV4 on R?
Dear R-Developers, The traffic today on s-news where Terry Therneau, I, and others are reporting some of the problems we have had using or converting applications to SV4 reminded me of something Duncan Temple Lang had mentioned to me a year ago that I wanted to follow up on. I recall that Duncan said either that if SV4 were to be implemented in R that it would not be the default behavior, or
2005 Feb 02
1
anova.glm (PR#7624)
There may be a bug in the anova.glm function. deathstar[32] R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project
1998 Mar 26
1
R-beta: mfg weirdness + future of graphics pars
Ross Ihaka writes: > > I just checked my S manual and it appears that layout > parameters like can "mfg" only be given in par(). Yes. pty is another, for example. > I think that in fact "mfg" is only meant to be queried. No. One use for setting mfg is to produce a page of plots in portrait orientation with, say, two small plots on the top half of the page
2003 Sep 11
1
discrepancy between R and Splus lm.influence() functions for family=Gamma(link=identity)
Hello, I am looking for an explanation and/or fix for a discrepancy in the behaviour of the R lm.influence() function [ version R 1.5.0 (2002-04-29) ] and the same function in Splus [ Splus version 5.1 release 1, running on SGI IRIX 6.2]. The discrepancy is of concern because I am migrating some Splus scripts to R and need to ensure consistency of results. Specifically, when I fit a glm()
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New function attributes for errno-setting functions
> I don't know how feasible this is to roll out on linux or other platforms > which may or may not have sympathetic libc maintainers. Assuming they aren't > sympathetic, you only have one less-great option IMO. That is that you hack > Clang to pattern match a well-known AST pattern into the > __builtin_errno_address builtin. For targets without a well-known pattern, >
1998 Jul 06
1
R-beta: Re: Choice of Linux
Chris, I can provide some personal experience, in that RedHat Linux has not only operated well, and is remarkably easy to set up, but seems to work as well as any Linux distribution with R. The default X-Windows setup looks pretty similar to MS Windows, which may make the transition easier. In fact, it was the on/off - finally off attitude of MathSoft toward producing a Linux version of S-Plus
1997 May 25
1
R-alpha: cat
Kurt, here's what S does (I recall going to some effort to duplicate the, at times, seemingly unusual behaviour of cat) S-PLUS : Copyright (c) 1988, 1996 MathSoft, Inc. S : Copyright AT&T. Version 3.4 Release 1 for Sun SPARC, SunOS 4.1.3_U1 : 1996 Working data will be in /users/rdev/rgentlem/.Data > x <- factor(c(1:3, NA), exclude=numeric(0)) > x [1] 1 2 3 NA >
2017 Nov 15
2
CFG normalization: avoiding `br i1 false`
> I'm not necessarily sympathetic to the idea of adding another canonicalization pass only for this purpose. The problem is that as you said, SimplifyCfg does all sorts of stuff, and I suspect is not the fastest pass in the world. Also, in the case that annoys me, there is an LCSSA pass in the middle, and I suspect it would be a better idea to only do the LCSSA etc. transform again if no
2001 Sep 13
0
FW: sum overflow (PR#1091)
> From: David Smith [mailto:dsmith@insightful.com] >> From: Prof Brian Ripley >> >> If you use integers you need to be aware of the consequences. It's a >> feature not a bug. > > Perhaps, but maybe a more useful feature would be to signal to the user when > such an overflow occurs? Sv4 does this by returning NA for overflow integer > results: > >
2019 Mar 26
0
Discrepancy between is.list() and is(x, "list")
I think this goes back to SV4 (c. late 1990's). The is.<type> functions are much older (c. mid 1970's) , from before any class system was in S. is() and inherits() were introduced with the S4 class system and were meant to escape from the prison made by ancient design choices. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:11 PM Abs Spurdle <spurdle.a