similar to: saemix: SAEM algorithm for parameter estimation in non-linear mixed-effect models (version 0.96)

I have used library Design (Frank Harrell) in the past but when I tried this week, I get : > library(Design) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Object "formula.default" not found I updated to the latest version of the library (2.0) with the same result. My version of R may not be the latest but it's recent (and I probably changed since using Design for the last time) :

Hi, I’m sorry, I know that it is a recurrent question but I have not been able to find the response in the Rhelp archives. I think my data require the use of the glmmPQL function but I do not know how to make the model selection. Since the AIC and log-likelihood are apparently meaningless, how can we select the parameters for a model and compare the models to find which one fits best the data?

Hello list, Is there any mean to fit models for ordinal response other than multinomial polytomous ("multinom" from nnet ) and cumulative logit ("polr" from MASS)? I am particularly interested in continuation-ratio model and adjacent-category logit model. It is for the sake of epidemiology in wild-living populations! Many thanks, Emmanuelle Fromont

I too was curious about this, so I copied the text into Babel Fish, and this is the result: I miss of the 2/04/2007 to the 11/04/2007. I will answer your message as of my return. For any urgency, to contact Emmanuelle Parache Moga or C?dric Buzay. If this guy is really going to be out until November these messages will get rather tiresome... John Beaman Telecom Specialist Voice

Hi ! I try to compare some models obtained from glmmPQL. model1 <- glmmPQL(y~red*yellow+I(red^2)+I(yellow^2)+densite8+I(densite8^2)+freq8_4 +I(freq8_4^2), random=~1|num, binomial); model2 <- glmmPQL(y~red*yellow+I(red^2)+I(yellow^2)+densite8+I(densite8^2)+freq8_4 , random=~1|num, binomial); anova(model1, model2) here is the answer : Erreur dans anova.lme(model1, model2) : Objects must

Seems the message below and the thread have reveived no attention/answer. The output presented is quite tricky. Looks like if lmer (lme4 0.9975-10) has accepted a negative binomial link with reasonable estimates, although it was not designed for... What can one think about result validity ? Best Patrick Message: 34 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:51:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "E. Robardet"

Hi ! We study the effect of several variables on fruit set for 44 individuals (plants). For each individual, we have the number of fruits, the number of flowers and a value for each variable. Here is our first model in R : y <- cbind(indnbfruits,indnbflowers); model1 <-glm(y~red*yellow+I(red^2)+I(yellow^2)+densite8+I(densite8^2)+freq8_4+I (freq8_4^2), quasibinomial); - We have

Dear R users, I'm performing some GLMMs analysis with a negative binomial link. I already performed such analysis some months ago with the lmer() function but when I tried it today I encountered this problem: Erreur dans famType(glmFit$family) : unknown GLM family: 'Negative Binomial' Does anyone know if the negative binomial family has been removed from this function? I really

Hi I am trying to setup an ipip tunnel to another linux router and am having serious problems. A bit of background first though because we may be going at this from the wrong angle. I have a router that runs bering firewall of a CF flash card that is going to act as a gteway for the amateur radio amprnet network. Heres what I need from it- I have an internal network 192.168.1.1 etc and a

Je suis absent du 2/04/2007 au 11/04/2007. Je r?pondrai ? votre message d?s mon retour. Pour toute urgence, contacter Emmanuelle Parache Moga ou C?dric Buzay.

Je suis absent du 2/04/2007 au 11/04/2007. Je r?pondrai ? votre message d?s mon retour. Pour toute urgence, contacter Emmanuelle Parache Moga ou C?dric Buzay.

Dear R users, I’m performing some GLMMs analysis with a negative binomial link. I already performed such analysis some months ago with the lmer() function but when I tried it today I encountered this problem: *Erreur dans famType(glmFit$family) : unknown GLM family: ‘Negative Binomial’* Does anyone know if the negative binomial family has been removed from this function? I really appreciate any

Ah, yes. One of the many differences between the US and the rest of the world. >>> support@drdos.info 4/3/2007 2:52:16 PM >>> john beaman wrote: > I too was curious about this, so I copied the text into Babel Fish, and this is the result: > > I miss of the 2/04/2007 to the 11/04/2007. I will answer your message as of my return. For any urgency, to contact Emmanuelle

> I'm running icecast 3.1.10 (from the ports collection) on a freebsd 4.3 jack> First of all, I hope you meant 1.3.10. If there's an icecast 3.1.10 jack> floating around, there are bigger problems. Yes, pardon, finger dyslexia. jack> 1.3.10 definately works with multiple mounts (what you called instances) jack> without problems. No, what I meant by instances was

Je suis absent du 2/04/2007 au 11/04/2007. Je r?pondrai ? votre message d?s mon retour. Pour toute urgence, contacter Emmanuelle Parache Moga ou C?dric Buzay.

November? It's DD/MM/YYYY in his case, not MM/DD/YYYY. Either way, even two days is more than enough for me. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of john beaman Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:43 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 33,

Chris, Here's my review notes: 1. In the Known problems section you identify PR656 as a known problem. However, this bug is resolved and in January you reported that you verified it on Solaris. So, one of two things needs to happen. Either remove this item from the release notes, or re-open the bug and tell me what still breaks. 2. It seems that several items from the original DRAFT email

LLVM 1.7 is available now! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ Release notes here: http://llvm.org/releases/1.7/docs/ReleaseNotes.html This release is huge! It contains about twice the number of new features as any previous release, and includes some big-ticket items that people have been requesting for a long time. In particular, this release contains a completely rewritten llvm-gcc

Ok tomas. For a good removal of all samba packages. 1) for x in `dpkg -l | grep samba` ; do apt-get remove --purge $x ; done 2) apt-get remove --purge winbind That should clear all packages of samba. When thats done. Try the install again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Thomas Massip [mailto:thomas.massip at e-tera.com] > Verzonden: woensdag 27

Feedback below.. > <will insert overview blurb here> Big new things: llvm-gcc4, new sparc > backend, Generic vector/SSE/Altivec support, X86 Scalar SSE support, > debugging support, many target-independent codegen improvements, inline asm, > llvm.org/web-reg. > > > Core LLVM IR Improvements: > > * The LLVM IR now has full support for representing