similar to: GPG 1.0.3 doesn't detect modifications to files with multiple signatures

Hi, I have released a new snapshot of GnuPG, I hope this is one of the last ones before 1.0.2 ;-) This is still a BETA VERSION and not intended for general use. ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/devel/gnupg-1.0.1e.tar.gz (1600k) The usual diff file is also available, but this time there is only a detached signature for this diff file, because I noticed to late that the --not-dash-escaped option

Hello, in the time since the relase of GnuPG 1.0, 2 new translation have been done: pt_PT and id. They will be in the next version. Please, if you want to do a translation, contact me first so that I can coordinate the efforts. werner -- Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013

Hi, I just came across this annoncement, which is particularly interesting as it is only 25 min away from my place... :-) Anyway, I guess the core of this is targeted at developers mainly. Cheers, Philipp Free Software/Open Source-Telephony-Summit 2004 http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2004/ http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/avr-16.12.03-000/ We are happy to announce

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 GnuPG's ElGamal signing keys compromised ========================================== Summary ======= Phong Nguyen identified a severe bug in the way GnuPG creates and uses ElGamal keys for signing. This is a significant security failure which can lead to a compromise of almost all ElGamal keys used for signing. Note that

Executive summary: /usr/bin/suidexec gives every user a root shell. Remove it. tlr ----- Forwarded message from Thomas Roessler <roessler@guug.de> ----- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:21:17 +0200 From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@guug.de> Subject: suidmanager: SECURITY BREACH: /usr/bin/suidexec gives root access to every user on the system To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: suidmanager

Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit 2006 Tuesday, May 2nd 2006 Wiesbaden, Germany For the third time the German Unix User Group (GUUG - www.guug.de) organizes the Free Software/Open Source Telephony-Summit, an international workshop and technical conference for developers and users of Free Software/Open Source telephony applications and for

hi! i've got a problem with samba 2.2.6 to access files. samba is running on a hpux 11.11. the server is not integrated in a domain. when i try to access files directly via explorer etc. no problem at all. when i try to access files via a nutcracker-shell from a pc that is in a domain (but the samba-share connected as user which exists on hpux) i get the following error in the log:

Hi I'm experiencing trouble with a Samba 3.0.7 installation and Windows 2000 Professional clients that lose their network drives after some time. The Samba server is acting as a Domain Controller for a single subnet with about 10 clients (W2k Pro with Service Pack 2-4). At some (random) time after the login the clients all have the same problem: the network drive mappings die (sometimes a

I just ran up2date on new Centos-3.1 installation and received about 5 of these errors. Is this something to be concerned about? The package kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue The package kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.3 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? The package GConf2-2.2.1-4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? It is using the

Hello, I cannot verify the GPG signatures of the latest LLVM download. It appears that this problema happened before ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10294) Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111204/a67b74f5/attachment.html>

Hi, Frederic, big thanks for your work on this, by a coincedence it's exactly what i need at work :) I'm compiling your branch on Debian GNU/Linux with mingw and having some minor troubles worth mentioning and (i hope) fixing. I configure with CC=586-mingw32msvc-gcc ./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc --prefix=/c/winnut/ Interestingly, there's scripts/Windows/Makefile in the repo

Hi! We are pleased to announce the availability of Dirmngr version 1.0.3. Dirmngr is a server for managing and downloading certificate revocation lists (CRLs) for X.509 certificates and for downloading the certificates themselves. Dirmngr also handles OCSP requests as an alternative to CRLs. Although Dirmngr can be invoked on demand, it should in general be installed as a system daemon. Get

Is there a reason for jessie-cran3 rather than xenial? For Linux Mint 18 (admittedly not 18.1) I have deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ as one of the apt entries. JN On 2017-04-27 02:57 PM, Clive Nicholas wrote: > Okay folks, I give up and - frankly - I'm fed up! I thought I'd sorted all > this last week, but clearly not. I've tried using mirrors from

We have a client that has a single Wildcard TDM400P with 3 FXO ports on Asterisk 1.0.7. Occasionally the system seems to loose its mind and starts originating calls from that Zap channels that don't exist. The receptionist picks up the phone and nobody is there. This can happen repeatedly over and over again within a few minutes. As far as we can tell these are definitely not real calls as

I've played around with the lightly documented Asterisk voicemail feature whereby a caller can press "*" during the playback of the OGM and be returned to the "a" extension in the context of the voicemail box. No matter what, Asterisk does nothing when you press "*". It does not interrupt the OGM and it certainly does not return to the "a" context.

Excuse me for off topic Can you address me to how can I make some kind of captive portal with shorewall for internet cafe (I just need users first agree with terms of use and after they are gained full internet access). Up to now I use this script http://www.andybev.com/index.php/Using_iptables_and_PHP_to_create_a_captive_portalbut I''d like to switch or tie this with shorewall cause

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:38 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:30:07PM -0500, John Lange wrote: > > I am not a Cisco person; so the question is, is it possible to have one > > of the following: > > > > 1) Have the Cisco authenticate (register) as a SIP client to the > > Asterisk server. This allows me to place the Cisco in its own context. >

Okay folks, I give up and - frankly - I'm fed up! I thought I'd sorted all this last week, but clearly not. I've tried using mirrors from here in the UK, Ireland, France and the USA and whichever mirror I use, all I get is this: clive at climate ~ $ sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://ubuntu.mirrors.uk2.net/ubuntu xenial InRelease Ign:2 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable

I have a very strange situation where the gpg command will fail to verify whether there is valid PGP data in some files. Decrypting these files works flawlessly. Here is an example: [root at server autoimport]# gpg -vv --verify-files 01UserEnumswValues.txt.asc.txt gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP MESSAGE gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) :pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 16, keyid

Hi! In the light of the recently found weaknesses in the MD5 hash function we won't anymore accompany software announcements with MD5 checksums. Instead SHA-1 checksums will be given. All modern GNU/Linux systems are featuring a sha1sum tool, similar to the md5sum too, so this there should be no problem checking the checksums on these platforms. For MS Windows no such tool is available. To