similar to: Vlan trunk/QinQ connected to KVM guest

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1744 Bug ID: 1744 Summary: Packet corruption occurs when using the nftables vlan pcp set command Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: arm OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel

On 7/25/19 1:10 PM, hw wrote: >> >> Configure all dns servers as primary slaves (plus 1 primary master) for >> your own domains.? I have never seen problems with resolution of local >> dns domains when the Internet was down. > > It seemed to have to do with the TTL for the local names being too > short and DNS being designed to generally query root servers rather

Hi, I'm inter-connecting AccessPoints using a tinc mesh and have bridge-nodes to bridge this vpn into some existing backbone. The AccessPoints bridge their users into 802.1q VLANs (per WiFi-Client, there can be multiple VLANs active on each AP) in the tinc mesh, and the bridge nodes bridge some vlans into the backbone. Now there is a router in the backbone that uses the same MAC on all VLANs,

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

Hello, I'm looking for any information on setting up VLANs to seperate the telephony network from the ordinary network. I have google'd around but haven't found a lot of information in the best way to go about this. Has anyone managed to do this successfully in conjunction with asterisks? If so, could they provide an overview of what they did and how they find it? Did the performance

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

Hi, I have a 64bit Debian Lenny server with two physical network interfaces, one is connected to a switch without VLANs (eth0), the other (eth1) is connected to a switch with tagged VLANs (eth1). I''m running a couple of paravirtualized VMs that have no problem using the eth0 interface (bridged). I''m also running a couple of fully virtualized VMs, one being a Linux box (with a

Hi, thanks for the feedback. > This is an interesting problem. I wonder how you would solve it if you > would have a real (managed) switch instead of tinc to connect the > access points and bridge nodes together? in the backbone we have HP ProCurve switches and all of them (except for the oldest series from more than 10 years ago) separate their forwarding database per vlan. HP calls

Hi, I have a Centos 5.5 server with no GUI installed. I have several times changed the timezone by copying the correct file to /etc/localtime, however something keeps changing it back. I'm not sure if this is a yum update or what. Without installing the graphical tools, how can I update the timezone in such a way that the /etc/localtime file won't keep getting clobbered. Thank

I've searched around but haven't found a definitive answer yet, is it possible to kickstart from a tagged VLAN? I found this bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431915 But I can't find out how far the vlan support goes. I haven't found anything about it in any kickstart docs. I have two tagged vlans: Vlan 100 - server subnet Vlan 101 - backup subnet From

hi everyone, I'm trying to get vlans tagged in libvirt as my switch's end (yes traffic will be leaving the host and into network switches) allows only tagged vlans. But with network as such: ...   <portgroup name='vlan-55'>     <vlan trunk='yes'>       <tag id='55'/>     </vlan>   </portgroup> </network> and guest as:    

Hello, I use a script network-multi vlan and network-bridge-vlan for multiple VLANs in domu. Several domu uses the bridge vlanbr30. Need to dom0 as was in this vlan''e. How? I tried to put a bridge interface ip, but with him until the rest domu in vlanbr30 not get through. How to understand the need to create a virtual interface (vifx.y) and add it to the bridge vlanbr30. How?

When vlan device is configured on top of the brige, it does not support any offload capabilities because the bridge device does not initiliaze vlan_fatures. Set vlan_fatures to be equivalent to hw_fatures. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic at redhat.com> --- net/bridge/br_device.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c

I'm planning to set up a libvirt/kvm system using a card with SR-IOV support. I'd like to use the vf pool option rather than statically assigning a vf to each vm. However, I'd also like each vm to have a static MAC address and I have multiple VLANs they will be on. I found in the documentation a syntax for specifying a MAC and a vlan when the vf is statically assigned, but I don't

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

I am running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 as my dom0 and CentOS 5.3 on my domU's. On the dom0, I have two interfaces that are bonded and have tagged VLANs. I can get the networks to the domU's by creating a bridge for each of the VLANS (bond0.3, bond0.4, etc). On the domU, the interfaces show up as eth0, eth1, etc. Is there a way to set up the network on the dom0 so my domU's see a single

Hi there, can anyone point me to the docs needed to support Tagged Vlans through Shorewall. I might just be blind or my understanding of Tagged Vlans isn''t good enough yet to find it. Axel

Steve, Thanks, makes sense. I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get my connection established. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > > > This makes two of us. I've done everything as you have described and it > >

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users