similar to: incoming works out does not (prolly a newbie question)

Hi, I'm using libvirt/kvm with openstack. When vm has CPU stall, the instance can't be destroyed. I have asked the question on openstack user mailing list and received no answers in weeks. Here is one example: # virsh destroy instance-00000085 error: Failed to destroy domain instance-00000085 error: Failed to terminate process 61222 with SIGKILL: Device or resource busy

Hi I tried to restrict usage of some running VM by cpu.shares (i.e. set to 10 from original 1024) on loaded system and it seem doesn't work as I expected... all running processes has same CPU usage (by htop) :-/ Does anyone has same experience? Fedora 19, libvirt-1.0.5.9-1.fc19.x86_64 Thanks a lot Martin -- Martin Pavlásek <mpavlase@redhat.com> OpenStack QA Associate/Red Hat

How do I see if the guest is using br0 only eth0 is configured on the guest Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:23:46AM -0500, ken wrote: > On 12/15/2015 09:37 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >This one works: > > > >http://mirrors.mit.edu/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > > > >I know because I/ve used it for net installs twice in the last > >week or two, most recently a Thursday of last week. > > > >>>Believe me, I wish it did work.

On 12/15/2015 09:37 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > This one works: > > http://mirrors.mit.edu/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > > I know because I/ve used it for net installs twice in the last > week or two, most recently a Thursday of last week. > >> >Believe me, I wish it did work. I've been at this stupid >> >specification which should be easy and done over with

Any help here? I have included all of the output of the suggested diags that Thomas said I should run, but I admit that I'm not sure what I'm looking for, as I'm not familiar with RPC functionality on Linux. Something is not working with RPC on my Samba 4.0.3 server. (FWIW, it doesn't work with IPTables stopped either.) > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mike Stroven wrote:

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>> >

I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged network mode, however I still have the default virtual network bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*) still play any role. If not, can I remove them? On most virtual hosts I see they are left around even when a

Well, I found a solution and posted it on the appdb's page of Red Alert 3. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14371 Here's a copy of the informations I posted on the Red Alert's Appdb webpage : > Thanks to raphael, here's a mini "how to play on LAN to RA3 with Wine + windows users, when the LAN is a VPN" > > My hostname, in

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> Changelog: v1: * Renamed _mlx5_rescan_driver to be mlx5_rescan_driver_locked like in other parts of the mlx5 driver. * Renamed MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VDPA to tbe MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VNET as a preparation to coming series from Eli C. * Some small naming renames in mlx5_vdpa. * Refactored adev index code to make Parav's SF series

Dear Samba-List, i'm new to the list and new to samba. Right now I'm trying setup a samba ADDC serving around 50 Windows 10 clients and a couple of linux clients. My ADDC Host has two NICs, eth0 should be connected to the wan - network, eth1 should be connect to a 10.* network, serving the windows and linux clients. The ADDC is up and running, serving only the 10.* network. I

Hello, There is a xen setup in which "brctl show" gives the following output. bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth1 8000.003048c9d4df no peth1 vif1.0 vif2.0

Currently I have shorewal 2.2 installed om my debian 2.6.8 kernel. The firewall machine can access the internet via a ethernet modem fine. The firewall can ping the local network. The local network can ping the firewall server, see the samba files. Howeven teh local network cannot access the internet through the firewall Any suggestions? Rob van Overbruggen Settings and stats: Server: Eth1 :

Hi folks, I''ve been trying to work out this situation for a few days now without much success and dug all over the archives for similar issues, none of which seem to relate exactly. I installed Debian Etch and the Xen (3.03) kernels / binaries on a Dell server. It works fantastic with all the default configurations with one strange flaw - as soon as the /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge