similar to: doco bug as to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "doco bug as to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel"

2007 Apr 09
3
plot log scale, axis original scale
I want to produce some boxplots and plot the logged values but have the axis scale in the original, not-logged scale. It seeming like I have the first few steps but I'm having trouble with the last. Here's what I'm doing (which I got for the documentation for boxplot and axis). How do I get the ticks to be labeled 2,5, and 9 of the original scale? a<-c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
2007 May 23
0
wiki HowTos/Custom_Kernel needs amendment
Hi, I see more and more people attempt to rebuild the CentOS 5 kernel - for example to get the legacy ISA card support turned on, etc. As Jim said on #centos-devel, the Custom_Kernel wiki page is valid for C4 but not so for C5. It seems that he does not have the time to update the page at this moment. I suggest that at least a warning message stating the instructions are not for C5 kernels
2014 Dec 15
2
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 15 December 2014 at 23:04, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >>> The following page has been changed by AkemiYagi: >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel?action=diff&rev2=179&rev1=178 >> >> I know I'm new around here and this is
2010 Jul 29
1
edit by AlanBartlett
I see this diff: Subject: centos wiki] u/d AdditionalResources/Repositories /RPMForge by AlanBartlett The following page has been changed by AlanBartlett: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge?action=diff&rev2=31&rev1=30 The comment on the change is: No questions should be asked of any author within any article. Please use "Info" to
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: > Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? > Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable > base. Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to > overcome afaik. As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially run in the userspace, the hard
2014 Dec 15
0
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > > On 15 December 2014 at 23:04, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> The following page has been changed by AkemiYagi: > >>> >
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 04/11/15 10:38, C Bergström wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: >> On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: >> >> Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? >> Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base. >> Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
Any progress on the FreeBSD front? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20151103/53a1688d/attachment.html>
2014 Dec 15
3
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <noreply at centos.org> > Date: Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM > Subject: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi > To: noreply at centos.org > > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "CentOS Wiki" for change notification. > > The
2008 Aug 22
1
A couple of minutes on GnuPG and signing files
There has been a notice of a breach (see: CVE-2007-4752) as to some binary content upstream of CentOS. I do not address that matter here beyond stating that the CentOS team have responded to the matter, and will continue this review process: updated 22 Aug 2008 CentOS acknowledge CVE-2007-4752 and are reviewing our build and signing processes and hosts for signs of tampering subsequent
2020 Feb 17
1
R-3.6.2 make check fails
Thanks. Here are my results for the commands you list: > which pdflatex /bin/pdflatex > rpm -qf /usr/bin/pdflatex texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch > cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > rpm -qi texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch Name : texlive-latex-bin-bin Epoch : 2 Version :
2020 Feb 17
1
R-3.6.2 make check fails
You're definitely missing bits of texlive. Lots of "missing file: mf" in your debug logs. I think you need to start with installing texlive-metafont. Alternately, there are pre-built R 3.6.2 packages for EL-7 here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1421894 I cannot push them as official updates to EPEL because of the catch-22 created by R's dependency on
2008 Sep 30
1
Notes on HowTos/Custom Kernel
Hello, Today I built a custom kernel in CentOS 5 following the instructions on this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel It's excellent, but I have some remarks I would add: 1. %define buildid .your_identifier In the commented line, there is a space after the % sign. You have to manually remove this space. I think someone was bit by this a short while ago. I think making this
2020 Feb 17
0
R-3.6.2 make check fails
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Barris, Wes wrote: > I have been able to build previous versions of R up to and including 3.5.3 successfully. Starting with 3.6.0 > the "make check" step fails with errors relating to "pdflatex" being missing. So, I installed texlive-latex > (and the 100 other rpm dependencies) then tried rebuilding R. "make check" continues to fail.
2007 Jun 07
2
procmail, and the care and feeding of mailing list content received
Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses
2010 Apr 27
0
R-help Digest, Vol 86, Issue 28
On 4/26/10 21:45:55 R P Herrold wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:45:55 -0400 (EDT) > From: R P Herrold<herrold at owlriver.com> > To: Marshall Feldman<marsh at uri.edu> > Cc:r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] Upgrading R using the "global library folder" strategy -, > what do you think about it? > Message-ID:<alpine.LRH.2.00.1004262141510.25472
2009 Jul 30
5
Open Letter to Lance Davis
I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers It is regrettable that we are forced
2004 Aug 06
2
RPM's
Hi, Thanks everyone for all you help I am getting there slowly :-) never install so many RPM's it been a good learning curve. libshout2 were do I get this rpm from as I cannot find this one anyware ?? also when trying to install libao-0.8.3-2.i386.rpm I get the following:- # rpm -i libao-0.8.3-2.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libaudiofile.so.0 is needed by libao-0.8.3-2
2009 Jun 10
0
License quandry in the Fedora sub-space of all R packages
There was mention of this [r-sig-fedora at r-project.org] mailing list on one of the other R lists overnight. I thought the list needed a bit of posting, as I could not recall seeing content recently on it. I cross post to the Red Hat hosted list as well, it raises issues relevant there as well I have been packaging in support of many of the financial packages at CRAN and in R-Forge [
2005 Jan 15
1
Guide to stripping Centos 3
I responded to a post in the Dell poweredge mailing list earlier today. My answer was off the top of my head, with a bit of experimentation. The content may be useful in the Cenyos context as well to admin's looking to strip the size of an install to the bare bones. Comment welcomed. Can anyone see any packages which I have missed? -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message