similar to: R 2.12?

Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

On 02/03/2016 09:52 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Are you trying to build R and components for i686 rather than x86_64? Never mind. Your logs make it clear that you're building for x86_64. Can you share the output of: pkg-config --list-all |grep libcurl curl-config --libs rpm -V libcurl-devel libcurl I'm honestly baffled as to why the configure script is failing to find libcurl.pc on

Greetings. I once ran across a simple (toy) example of using a closure in R to manage bank accounts. I've got a use for it now but can no longer find it. If you have it (or a similar example), will you please send it to me? (Unfortunately, a web search that includes the terms "bank" and "closure" leads into a whole pile of unrelated stuff.) Thanks, -- Mike

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

Full details, including all sorts of logs here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655 A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these days. ~tom == Fedora Project

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

Greetings. I understand that to generate distinct sequences of random numbers in R one can initialize the calculation of each sequence by calling the set.seed() function with a distinct value for "seed" the (integer) first argument to the function. I'd like to know if there are any guidelines or best practices for choosing "seed". I.e., is it OK just to choose seed as

>>>>> Tom Callaway >>>>> on Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:06:25 -0500 writes: > An excellent question. It is important to remember two key > facts: > 1. With gcc on ppc64, long doubles exist, they can > be used, just not safely as constants (and maybe they > still can be used safely under specific conditions?). > 2. I am not an

Hi, I've just discovered R keeps installing my packages into C:\Users\Ben instead of "C:\\Users\\Ben;/R/win-library/2.12" which is what is returned by running Sys.getenv("R_LIBS_USER"). I've tried setting environment variables in windows control panel of R_LIBS. But nothing seems to be working, it still wants to fill my user folder, I've tried uninstalling

dear all, i have a quite simple question, i want to fill up a Matrix like done in the following function, but the performance is very bad for large dimensions is there a way to do this like with apply or something similar? makeMatrix <- function(a, b,dim) { X=matrix(0,ncol=dim,nrow=dim) for (i in c(1:dim)){ for (j in c(1:dim)) { if (i==j) {X[i,j]<-a} else { X[i,j]<- exp((

Hi! The attached patch changes the rule that describes the actions for gramLatex.c in src/library/tools/src/Makefile.in so it actually generates that file instead of "gramLatex." (no extension). The file name without extension is not referenced anywhere else and in R-2.12 the same rule still used the full name, so it appears that the "c" was lost in editing somewhere along the

Hello there, I just upgraded to R 2.15 (from R 2.12) on a Windows XP machine and noticed some puzzling behaviour (that in my opinion did not exist in R 2.12). It is possible now to call objects without spelling out the full object name. R now seems to use that (unique) object which shares the same beginning of the called object, even though the originally called object might not even exist.

Have tried to install R.app several times (6, in fact: versions 2.12, 13 & 14, both 32 and 64 bit versions), using packages freshly downloaded from the official project page, and failed every time, given exception reports such as the following (appended below, the 2 reports arising out of my 1st & 6th attempts). Machine & software version specifics are all contained therein. What

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: >> >> http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ >> >> I did this: >> >> sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links >> are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. >> >> >> I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals