similar to: Heads up - symlinked GotoBLAS in F14

Hello, I upgraded my kvm server from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16 and the only casualty was a Windows 2003 Server client that will no longer boot with and produces a BSOD. I admittedly know very little about Windows and this VM has been around - real hardware -> Parallels on a Mac -> linux kvm but it was working fine under Fedora 14. The client does boot fine under safe mode but anything higher

Hi I just read the thread on gotoBLAS, as well as the excellent vignette of gcbd. I still have some confusion and would like to ask very basic questions, hope I am not taking too much of your time. The point that retained my attention was the question of using implicit (multi-threaded blas) versus explicit (parallel code) optimisation. As I understood, the ideal would be to use a

(oops accidentally sent to -owners) Hi, i'm trying to start a LXC guest on a F14 computer .. followed the examples in http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html, but got stuck when starting it .. 03:07:23.706: debug : virCgroupNew:542 : New group / 03:07:23.707: debug : lxcControllerRun:563 : Setting up private /dev/pts 03:07:23.711: debug : lxcControllerRun:589 : Mouting 'devpts' on

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:56:50PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote: > OK, thanks. I just did a yum install virt-v2v on a Fedora 14 VM - but > the man pages don't have anything about how to do physical machines. I > already have a p2v CD built with virt-p2v-image-builder a while ago. I > boot my source server from that CD - what do I do on the Fedora 14 > conversion VM? How do I

On my CentOS 6.3 machine, in /etc/idmapd.conf I've updated the "[Mapping]" section of the config file: Nobody-User = paulbsch Nobody-Group = paulbsch But the mapping is not working. Files still show up as being owned by "nobody". On my Fedora 14 machine, with the exact same changes to /etc/idmapd.conf, the mapping works perfectly and the files show up as being owned by

I think the thing that is missing is a simple way for end users on windows to replace blas/lapack libraries with MKL-a package that you install that puts the libraries in the right place. Microsoft provides something for their distro, but we don't have the equivalent if you get R from cran. On 29 October 2017 at 22:01, Kenny Bell wrote: | User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO

I'm setting up an Ubuntu?virtual machine?that will use 4-Intel Xeon CPU x5650.? I'd like to compile R with a BLAS but the question is whcih one.? Seems like the only free ones are GotoBLAS which I'm not sure is being maintained for newer CPUs and OpenBLAS for Loongson CPUs.? I saw a favorable report on OpenBLAS

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 21:59 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > try adding 'map to guest = Bad User' to smb.conf > > Rowland > IT WORKED!!! THANK YOU. Now the XP machine can see both the f14 and f20 shares. (It was not even necessary to restart nmbd or smbd on the f20 machines.) Now, if I'm not asking for too much, can you please explain why this worked. :-) Many thanks

Hi all, I've compiled R (version 2.8.1) from the source code with "--with- blas=" option in order to use external multi-threaded blas package. However, it's very hard to verify that compilation is correct and R is using multi-threads correctly or not. Which command or operation in R will run with multi-threads? I assumed that matrix multiplication %*% may call multi-threaded

Hello r-bugs, I am running openSuse 11.0, with my new Intel 8500 (Penryn) C2D, and I want to use icc and ifort. I was able to get a working Goto BLAS, following Dr. Goto's instructions. That seems to work OK with gcc and gfortran. I get about 10% faster computations by using -O3 rather than -O2. I get faster results with Goto BLAS rather than the R BLAS. Now I want to make icc and ifort

Marc, et al, Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. Summary of problem: 1) XP sees samba shares on fedora14/samba3 machine, but not on fedora20/samba4 machines. 2) all fedora machines see all shares including on XP machine. 3) clicking on f20 machine from XP tries to log in rather than showing the shares. Login is not successful. 4) all machines can ping each

Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora''s Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It''s not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops

On 29 October 2017 at 22:01, Kenny Bell wrote: | User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome | addition. | | I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data | immensely. | | They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to | development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. With all due respect: You may

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Try running 'samba-tool testparm' and fix any errors it flags up. Is "samba-tool' a ubuntu Samba thing? With Fedora Samba versions 3.5 and 4.5, it does not exist. The 'testparm' most certainly does and I agree with using it. I just recently set up my new Fedora 25 box and used it after

I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be a central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as secure as possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm having trouble getting Apache to use mod_auth_pam. I also now can't get setroubleshootd working to send me notifications of the denials and provide tips to solve the problem. The Apache

Hi all, I''ve got xen-4.1.1 running with linux-3.0.0-rc5 and am trying to start my first guest, f14-x86_64, which does boot on bare metal. The configs below show kernel, ramdisk, and disk assignments for the virtual machine. They also show that the virtual machine uses the target disk devices. The last section shows part of the boot sequence starting with the disk assignments,

I thought I would try btrfs on a new installation of f14. yes, I know its experimental but stable so it seemed to be a good time to try it. I am not sure if I have missed something out of all my searching but am I correct in thinking that currently: I. it is not possible to boot from a snapshot of the operating system and, in particular, the yum snapshots cannot be used for

I am trying to connect to the virtualbox hypervisor through libvirt. If I am doing it correctly, virsh -c vbox:///session should get me connected. I am on F14 64 bit. I tried this with both vbox 3.2 and 4.02. I keep getting the following error: error: no connection driver available for vbox:///session. What am I missing? Thanks, Gary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi listees! Just installed C6 (more or less) permanently on my eeepc. I've enabled rpmfusion non-free, rpmfusion free, elrepo, and epel, prior to this point I've been running fedora on it (f10 thru f14) and have always found VLC at rpmfusion. (but finally RHEL/Centos have become modern enough to support the eeepc's funky hardware, so I'm switching back--tired of the version

Hello list, I have two drives - the first drive currently has F14 on it. The second drive is empty. If I select custom partition and only partititon and format the second drive, will CentOS install on the second and not touch the first drive? This is using the installer from the CentOS 6.4 Live DVD. Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: