similar to: R 2.12.0 in Fedora Updates Testing

R 2.12.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward.

R 2.11.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). It will likely be the last R update for Fedora 11. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us

Hi, I'm trying to install the newest version of libvirt and libvirt-client from the rpms at ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ on a Fedora 14 machine. The naming of the rpms as "libvirt-0.9.4-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm" suggests that this is exactly the system this was made for, however, installation still does not go smoothly. When I try to install these packages with yum install

Hi, I have the following error in syslog when starting virt-manager and trying to connect: May 25 16:39:33 sage libvirtd: 16:39:33.525: error : remoteDispatchAuthPolkit:3846 : Policy kit denied action org.libvirt.unix.manage from pid 27509, uid 500, result: 512 I can manually start the kvm guest using virsh, but why can't virt-manager start them? This is on fedora14 x86_64: # rpm

Will (does) Centos 6 require 512Mb of memory for the GUI install like FC14 or the lower requirement of FC13? My ASUS EE 700 has ~490Mb of memory (vidoe steals some from the 512Mb base) and FC14 switches to text install and does not install any GUI, leaving the boot in test mode. I recall a message earlier that 6 is based off of 14, but not the final Anaconda, thus my question. It would be

R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and

On my CentOS 6.3 machine, in /etc/idmapd.conf I've updated the "[Mapping]" section of the config file: Nobody-User = paulbsch Nobody-Group = paulbsch But the mapping is not working. Files still show up as being owned by "nobody". On my Fedora 14 machine, with the exact same changes to /etc/idmapd.conf, the mapping works perfectly and the files show up as being owned by

R 2.11.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing". In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward. Here's how: 1. Go to the Fedora Updates web

Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora''s Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It''s not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops

The Karma Hall Of Fame is now available at: http://bugs.digium.com/karma_halloffame.php Users with negative karma aren't named'n'shamed.. YET.. but congrats to all the users with positive karma on the current list! The list shows all users holding the top 10 karma scores in the system. Right now you need a 12 or above to feature on the list, and there's a boat load of people just

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

Marc, et al, Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. Summary of problem: 1) XP sees samba shares on fedora14/samba3 machine, but not on fedora20/samba4 machines. 2) all fedora machines see all shares including on XP machine. 3) clicking on f20 machine from XP tries to log in rather than showing the shares. Login is not successful. 4) all machines can ping each

Hi all, I''ve got xen-4.1.1 running with linux-3.0.0-rc5 and am trying to start my first guest, f14-x86_64, which does boot on bare metal. The configs below show kernel, ramdisk, and disk assignments for the virtual machine. They also show that the virtual machine uses the target disk devices. The last section shows part of the boot sequence starting with the disk assignments,

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

I have Samba Version 3.5.8-74.fc13 (Fedora 13) set up as the PDC for an NT domain. I have several Windows XP Pro and Windows 7 Ultimate workstations as domain members and everything is working fine. Domain users can log-in at the workstations, access shares on the Samba server and the other workstations, etc. I am in the process of adding Samba Version 3.5.8-76.fc14 (Fedora 14) as an additional

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

Hello listmates, Here's I am, trying to install Centos 6.2 64-bit on a server with 24 TB of disk RAIDed as RAID 6. So I get this 18 TB disk (the RAID is recognized as one disk) where I am trying to put my OS. And I can create a couple of partitions - let us say I defiine a 150 GB swap, a 150 GB "/", a 100 GB "/var". So far so good. Then I try to define the next one, say, a

The BOINC project has a screensaver that runs on Windows. I installed BOINC in a virtual machine running Windows XP (32 bit) and copied boinc.scr from the C:\Windows directory onto my 64 bit F13 system. When I run the screensaver I get an error. Any feedback is appreciated. I can run glxgears without any problem. $ wine boinc.scr Wine cannot find the ncurses library (libncurses.so.5).

Our small network is 10.10.11.0/24, gateway 10.10.11.252. dhcp is set up. I'm using virt-manager to install VM's with kvm-qemu on an F14 host - 10.10.11.100. qemu-kvm-0.13.0-0.6.rc1.fc14.x86_64 libvirt-0.8.3-2.fc14.x86_64 I'd like all the VM's to be on the same network as the physical machines with an address range of 10.10.11.110-10.10.11.130. I have virt-net set up. ifconfig

hello people, I am trying to launch a windows program, and I'm getting this error: Code: wine: cannot find L"C:\\windows\\system32\\wineboot.exe" err:process:start_wineboot failed to start wineboot, err 2 err:seh:setup_exception_record stack overflow 1164 bytes in thread 0009 eip 6834bad7 esp 00240ea4 stack 0x240000-0x241000-0x340000 Segmentation fault (core dumped) I am under