similar to: R 2.4.1 packages built for unstable and testing

Trying to build a Debian snapshot of R-alpha based on last night's tarball, it fails with what looks like a missing -lm linking directive: [...] gcc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fpic -O2 -c version.c -o version.o gcc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fpic -O2 -c vfonts.c -o vfonts.o g77 -fpic -O2 -c xxxpr.f -o

I just uploaded R 2.5.0 to Debian's unstable distribution. As Peter's announcement says, it now contains two new packages'rcompgen' and 'codetools'. About two or three weeks ago, I also packaged these, just like other 'recommended' packages as r-cran-rcompgen and r-cran-codetools. However, as "new" packages, they are still in the NEW queue awaiting

Thanks for your help Dirk.. I have not been able to find the .deb file anywhere. Do you happened to have the link for the deb file?? I appreciate your help. Roberto -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:edd at debian.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:33 PM To: Romo, Roberto Cc: r-sig-debian at r-project.org; Ramirez, Federico Subject: Re: [R-sig-Debian] RStudio

A heuristic runs via the r-base-core package postinst. It is intended to use the result from Debian's paperconf(1) toool, and to update the R environment variable R_PAPERSIZE accordingly. This apparently broke some time ago when R changed to a dual variable setup, and my regexp didn't notice. Does anybody use this, or is it ok if I simply disable this in Debian? In that case we simply

Hi all, Today's apt-get update should bring the first R 2.4.0 snapshot packages. As with previous releases, I intend to renew the packages every week until the release of 2.4.0 by R Core that is scheduled for October 3. That way, R 2.3.1-3 will remain the version in testing. As you may have seen on the r-devel list, 2.4.0 will require that packages using S4 classes and the methods package

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

Hi Dirk, Thanks for the explamnayion - Debian is running in a VM (and nothing really installed on it) , and I think the easiest is for me just to install Debian 10 and to use that one. Thanks a lot, Rainer > On 22 Sep 2020, at 15:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > On 22 September 2020 at 14:49, Rainer M Krug wrote: > | I know this is likely

R always had all its files below /usr/lib/R, which isn't perfectly in line with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS). We did get some bug reports on this, and I tried to argue for a while that this was consistent upstream behaviour etc pp I would expect the issue to come back again. Brian Ripley had made some changes to R a few months ago which allow to split doc/, include/ and share/ off

Hi R-SIG-DEBIAN We are trying to setup the R Shiny Server using Ubuntu using these<https://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio/download-server/> instructions. Unfortunately when we try to set up the repository to install r-studio into Ubuntu from the terminal the url that we are using does not appear to be right. Here I where we are placing the url /etc/apt/sources.list a and this is the

How exactly to use the tag "Obsoletes:" in a spec file ? I need to offer texlive to users on Centos-5.6, so I packaged it (based on a Mandriva src.rpm), and that works. But I want rpm to *replace* tetex by texlive, instead of just adding texlive, when users do a : $ yum install texlive (we have a local repo here). So I added this line in texlive.spec : Obsoletes: tetex and of

Announcing cran2deb: 1700+ Debian packages from almost all of CRAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Last Friday's presentation at UseR! 2009 was the first really public mention of 'cran2deb'. It provides Debian packages of all of CRAN. It started as Charles' project from last year's Google Summer of Code, was further extended by us over the

Hi I know this is likely documented somewhere, but I can?t find it. How can I install R > 4.0.0 on Debian 9 Stretch? Thanks a lot, Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7490-0066 Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Z?rich Office Y34-J-74

I noticed a strange thing on my CentOS 4 workstations today. Immediately after installing the tetex suite (tetex-xdvi tetex-dvips tetex tetex-latex tetex-afm tetex-fonts), "rpm -V tetex" reports some package inconsistencies: rpm -V tetex ........C /usr/bin/amstex ........C /usr/bin/bamstex ........C /usr/bin/bplain ........C /usr/bin/lambda ........C

Hi, I'm keeping a Debian unstable system, and recently found 2 problems: 1) building a package (R CMD build diveMove, available from CRAN) depending on KernSmooth fails with: ---<---------------cut here---------------start-------------->--- Loading required package: KernSmooth Error in dyn.load(file, ...) : unable to load shared library

I just found out that an .onLoad() function such as this stylized one (where I just renamed some identifiers) .onLoad <- function(lib, pkg) { require(zoo, quiet=TRUE, warn.conflicts=FALSE) library.dynam("foolib", pkg, lib ) if (.Platform$OS.type != "windows") { initSomeServices() } if (.Platform$OS.type != "windows") {

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to install R on Linux (Redhat 4). But 'yum' does not seem to work... thanks for your help/hints/suggestions in advance! ------------ $ sudo cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.34.6-54.24.amzn1.i686 (mockbuild at build-31003.build) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 23:13:59 UTC 2010 $ sudo yum install

Can anybody explain to me what's going on here? This is a CentOS 4 i386 system. [root at edison ~]# rm -f /etc/prelink.cache [root at edison ~]# /etc/cron.daily/prelink [root at edison ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/sqlite3 sqlite-3.3.6-2 [root at edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite prelink: /usr/bin/sqlite3: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?.....

Rd.sty defines \newlength{\middle} which seems to be in conflict with the my latex installation. Here is a minimal example: \documentclass{article} \newlength{\middle} \begin{document} \end{document} It runs fine on a Linux box: carp:136% latex test.tex This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.1) (test.tex LaTeX2e <2000/06/01> Babel <v3.7h> and hyphenation patterns for american,

Hello, can anyone explain the following error I get when trying to use the CHECK command to check a new version of my pakcage under 1.4.0? ****** ./R CMD check ~/GLMMGibbs.0.5.1/GLMMGibbs * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory `/homef/jonm/R-1.4.0/bin/GLMMGibbs.Rcheck' ... <Installs library, documentation, and then performs various tests, including the example,