similar to: Volsize for DomU

What does it mean for the reported value of a zvol volsize to be less than the product of used and compressratio? For example, # zfs get -p all home1/home1mm01 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE home1/home1mm01 type volume - home1/home1mm01 creation 1254440045 - home1/home1mm01 used 14902492672

Hi, a zfs create -V 1M pool/foo dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/foo bs=1k count=1k (using Nevada b94) yields zfs get all pool/foo pool/foo used 1,09M - pool/foo referenced 1,09M - pool/foo volsize 1M - pool/foo refreservation 1M local Why is ''referenced'' bigger

Hi, I''m searching for a tutorial to install correctly a xen domU on OpenSolaris domO. Please help me ... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

> I tried to copy a 8GB Xen domU disk image from a zvol device > to an image file on an ufs filesystem, and was surprised that > reading from the zvol character device doesn''t detect "EOF". > > On snv_66 (sparc) and snv_73 (x86) I can reproduce it, like this: > > # zfs create -V 1440k tank/floppy-img > > # dd if=/dev/zvol/dsk/tank/floppy-img

Hi, I have a problem similar to the previous poster (thread: Virtual network of DomU''s), but apparently not with similar solutions... Situation: - two physical links aggregated to "default0" - dladm create-vlan on default0 with several different vlans - xVM DomU running linux connected to the same vlans when trying to ping the DomU from Dom0, I can see with snoop (in Dom0)

could we increase the size for dom guest online without rebooting or unmounting? pls kindly advise any methods. Yahoo!香港提供網上安全攻略，教你如何防範黑客! 請前往 http://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/ 了解更多! _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello zfs-discuss, I''m writing a script to do automatically snapshots and destroy old one. I think it would be great to add to zfs destroy another option so only snapshots can be destroyed. Something like: zfs destroy -s SNAPSHOT so if something other than snapshot is provided as an argument zfs destroy wouldn''t actually destroy it. That way it would

Hello, As a Virtuozzo users we have majority of our diskspace formatted with -i 1024 -b 1024. Lately I discovered that on CentOS 4.6 ext2online barfs when I try to grow such filesystem. Running it with -v -d, it prints lots of lines like: ext2online v1.1.18 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b ext2online: 873646830 is a bad size for an ext2 fs! rounding down to 873644033 ... group NNN inode table has

I have a box running snv_134 that had a little boo-boo. The problem first started a couple of weeks ago with some corruption on two filesystems in a 11 disk 10tb raidz2 set. I ran a couple of scrubs that revealed a handful of corrupt files on my 2 de-duplicated zfs filesystems. No biggie. I thought that my problems had something to do with de-duplication in 134, so I went about the process of

Hello everyone! I am working on resizing qcow2 images using virt-resize+liguestfs. E.g. I when shrinking a partition, I have to resize filesystem using resize2fs-size. The problem is that I cannot find out minimal partition size (aka resize2fs -P). The only way is calling "resize2fs-size 1K", wait for resize2fs to claim "resize2fs: New size smaller than minimum (510050)"

Hi All: I am trying to resize a centos (5.2) VM drive. I use VMware and I have increased the size of the drive by 40G. I am running resize2fs on /dev/sdb1 (which is my root partition) but when I do I get this error: [root at centos ~]# resize2fs /dev/sdb1 120G resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) The containing partition (or device) is only 19970795 (4k) blocks. You requested a new size of 31457280

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755729 This bug reports that the error message printed by the resize2fs API calls (which comes directly from the resize2fs command) says: Please run 'e2fsck -f /dev/vda1' first. That command is not possible from guestfish (where it would be 'e2fsck-f' or 'e2fsck ... forceall:true'). Fixing that bug caused this bug:

Hi, It doesn''t work as a PVM domain within xVM: # uname -srv SunOS 5.11 snv_133 # virt-install --name osvm01 -p -r 1024 -f /export/xvm/osvm01/disk1 -l nfs://localhost/export/install --nographics Starting install... Retrieving file unix... 100% |=========================| 2.1 MB 00:00 Retrieving file boot_arch 100% |=========================| 44 MB 00:00 Creating

Hello, I have a Sun X4140 running snv_134 as a Dom0 with a CentOS 4.8 (for Oracle 9i) and an Opensolaris DomU running on it with 4 NICs configured. I''m experiencing the virtual NICs dropping on the host. The Dom0 NICs are up and fine, and I am able to xm console into the DomU. The only metric that I have which seem useful is that memory scan rate spiked from near-0 to 507 under a

I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig partition.? I resized the other part of the disk to allow more space for centos.? I then created an unformated partition in the available space,? ran pvcreate /dev/sda4 vgextend lvname /dev/sda4 lvextend -L 184.46G /dev/lvname/root but when I run: sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root I get: resize2fs: Bad magic

Consider this section: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-4.html#ss4.14 I have not done this before and I'm leary about Step 11 which is resizing the filesystem after doing a mkraid command. This howto lacks any ext3 documentation. Some questions I have are: 1. Should I convert back to ext2 on all my filesystems before I do a mkraid? 2. If I leave the system at ext3, will the

Greetings - I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine. I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill the new space (# resize2fs -p /dev/vde1) and I get the results that the filesystem is already xx blocks long, nothing to do. If I do a # df -h, I can see that the

Hello everybody, I''m playing with Xen and trying to extend DomU disk space. My Configuration: Dom0: all Xen machine are HVM. They''re installed on LVM. I''ve one VG (XEN) on Dom0 and created a LV (here, xps.101.disk) per DomU. disk configuration in xen conf is as follow: disk = [ ''phy:/dev/XEN/xps.%d.disk,ioemu:hda,w'' % (vmid)

Hi Richard, Richard Robinson wrote: > I should add that I also used truss and saw the same ENOMEM error. I am on a 4Gb system with swap -l reporting > > swapfile dev swaplo blocks free > /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/swap 181,1 8 4194296 4194296 > > and I was trying to follow the directions for increasing swap here: >

I have a file system I am trying to resize via resize2fs but I get this error resize2fs 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) resize2fs: New size too large to be expressed in 32 bits im on debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-amd64 # pvs ? PV???????? VG????? Fmt? Attr PSize? PFree ? /dev/md1?? vgRAID6 lvm2 a-?? 18.17t 134.12g # lvs ? LV??? VG????? Attr?? LSize? Origin Snap%? Move Log Copy%? Convert ? data1 vgRAID6 -wi-ao