similar to: Does IPMP work in 2009.06?

I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as

(Bcc''ed to networking discuss). Hi All, Have enclosed man page draft for dlstat(1M) herewith. This is part of the effort to gain better visibility into network traffic in light of crossbow features like virtual NICs, interrupt vs. polling modes etc. This in turn would greatly assist network performance analysis. It is also aimed at segregating link/flow configuration from

On OpenSolaris 2009.06 I created a flow, half a dozen VNICs, and I set some properties, and everything was working, then I rebooted my system and everything disappeared from show-vnic, show-flow, and show-prop. When I tried to re-create the objects, dladm said they already existed. While I could not see the objects, I could delete them. Example: # dladm show-vnic # dladm create-vnic -l bge0

We have had an interesting issue with Market Data and Network Interface failures in the past with ipmp (or even VCS multinicA).. Multicast groups can not span multiple interfaces and in our environment when we have a network failure the interface is failed over however the multicast group does not. The only way to recreate the multicast group is to restart the application with the active network

Crossbow team, The following is of interest to the Crossbow project. Since a large chunk of these changes also exist in the Crossbow gate, the delivery of this wad will result in fewer lines of changes for Crossbow''s delivery. If someone on Crossbow could participate in this review, that would be a bonus (Eric Cheng made original changes in the Crossbow gate at some point last year).

Author: meem Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 40aa11f97fc0148333e53145eebb12da7e84dec5 Log message: PSARC/2006/289 Rationalized IFF_NOFAILOVER for IPMP Singleton 6397456 IPMP needs to support *just* link-based failure detection with singleton Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.lib/in.mpathd/mpd_main.c update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.lib/in.mpathd/mpd_tables.c update:

Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb

Hello, I am a rather new user to OpenSolaris and I have been loving every minute of it. I have spent quite a lot of time looking around for bandwidth management features and Project Crossbow is just amazing. It is truly amazing compared to what Linux has to offer. I would like to use flowadm to do some bandwidth management on a tun interface. The problem is that it is not recognized by the dladm

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.

So I have this dual 16-core Opteron Dell R715 with 128G of RAM attached to a SuperMicro disk enclosure with 45 2TB Toshiba SAS drives (via two LSI 9200 controllers and MPxIO) running OpenIndiana 151a4 and I''m occasionally seeing a storm of xcalls on one of the 32 VCPUs (>100000 xcalls a second). The machine is pretty much idle, only receiving a bunch of multicast video streams and

We''re currently designing a ZFS fileserver environment with iSCSI based storage (for failover, cost, ease of expansion, and so on). As part of this we would like to use multipathing for extra reliability, and I am not sure how we want to configure it. Our iSCSI backend only supports multiple sessions per target, not multiple connections per session (and my understanding is that the

Hi,    I''ve been using xVM with no problems since 2009.06 release (centos4/5, rhel4/5, sol10 as guests). This was using the 111a version. Just installed a new server with the 111b version and .... virt-install --nographics -p -r 8192 -n CentOS_48_64_92 -f /dev/zvol/dsk/zm0/vm/CentOS_48_64_92 -l ftp://192.168.101.120/pub/CentOS-48 -w bridge=aggr0 --os-type=linux --os-variant=rhel4

Basically what I am trying to attempt here is to have multiple vm''s in a private network that is seperate from any of the physical networking devices. So far all I have really been able to do is connect the vm''s to an etherstub, but cannot get them to communicate with eachother. I have been using this (http://blogs.sun.com/droux/entry/private_virtual_networks_for_solaris) as a

Hi all, I installed 2009.06, xVM and happily installed a domU with no issues. I just did this through the virt-manager GUI, and kept it as simple as possible. Later I installed and booted a zone with very simple and standard configuration. My existing xVM virtual machine did not immediately stop working, or have any interruption at all. But, I can no longer create new virtual machines, or even

redirecting to crossbow-discuss... On 03/12/09 15:17, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > In snv_108, I''m playing with creating a vnic over an etherstub, and I > might not be doing it right, but the behaviour I''m seeing doesn''t look > right either. > > So this is what I did... > > # dladm create-etherstub estub0 > # dladm create-vnic -l estub0 vnic0 > #

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in

Hi all, i have a xen 4.3 installation and would like to have a bridge bond szenario: *** eth0 eth1 | | bond0 | br0 | vif = [ ''bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'' ] *** With the network script in debian wheezy *** /etc/network/interfaces auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1

Hi All, I have bfu''ed to net-virt_xb-21_snv_81_021308. The dladm command on my machine does not have create-etherstub option. Please let me know what could be the issue. Thanks Khushal

Using OpenSolaris 2008.11 build 110. Created vnic''s and etherstub''s and they are displayed using dladm show-links but when the server is rebooted a ''dladm show-link'' is empty although the vnic and etherstub devices are still there and function properly. That is a real inconvenience, so why do the no longer show after a reboot or shutdown/start? Is there a

Hi ! In snv_127 I suddenly face a problem I never had before. Xvm can''t attach a vif to my primary physical nic any longer: $ pfexec xm start ulrac1 Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. error: Failed to create vnic over yukonx1 with MAC address 00:16:36:3c:bf:70 This worked fine in all previous snv_12x releases I tested, including snv_126. I think there is a privilege