similar to: Upgrade from b113 to b122 - any gotchas

Hello, I have a ZFS filesystem (zpool version 26 on Nexenta CP 3.01) which I''d like to rollback but it''s having an existential crisis. Here''s what I see: root at bambi:/# zfs rollback bambi/faline/userdocs at AutoD-2010-09-28 cannot rollback to ''bambi/faline/userdocs at AutoD-2010-09-28'': more recent snapshots exist use ''-r'' to

Hi,   I would like to make a program that reads excel files, and writes the cells of which contents is not a formula to another file. I don't think this is possible with RODBC, but it may be possible with rcom.     I read the documentation of the rcom package, but I was hoping somebody knows a good web resource for more eleborate info. I tried Googling, but alas (did you know rcom also is a

We're abusing icecast in a true narrowcasting setup (personalized stream per mountpoint). The streams itself are created in a piece of proprietory (spelling?, i'm dutch) software, icecast merely relays them. However, the intended endpoint is an embedded device. This device has trouble with tcp/ip packets not matching the max. packet size (MSS or MSS minus header). After eleborate testing,

I currently have 2 x ESXi boxes that have VMs stored on a NFS/iSCSI debian lenny linux box. I had purchased a new whitebox server as an intended replacement for the linux box. I had always planned on installing opensolaris on the new hardware with this config; 2 x 640GB mirrored rpool 6 x 1TB in raidz2 This box was going to be built in parallel with the current server and I would have simply

On 2018-05-16 00:34, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev wrote: > Vectorization goes overboard because the throughput cost model used by > the > vectorizers doesn't match the 6 IR instructions that correspond to 1 > x86 > rotate instruction. Instead, we have: > > [...] > > The broken cost model also affects unrolling and inlining. Size costs > are > overestimated

> > p.s. For an in depth analysis of TCP_CORK read Christiopher Baus' excelent > article: http://www.baus.net/on-tcp_cork Thanks for this pointer. I'd been meaning to reply on this thread, but hadn't got around to it, primarily because I didn't really understand TCP_CORK (the linux manpage is, as usual, fairly unclear on what exactly it does). Now I understand! > >

sir , I Have the following error , please let me know. with kind regards ds checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output...

When I try to virt-install a PV instance of F11, I''m getting an ''invalid kernel'' message, as if it''s not a Xen kernel. I have tried both the i386 and x86_64 versions. Is there any weirdness with this distro that I''m not aware of?

I''m trying to add extra zvols to a Solaris10 DomU, sv_113 Dom0 I can use virsh attach-disk <name> <zvol> hdb --device phy to attach the zvol as c0d1. Replacing hdb by hdd gives me c1d1 but then that is it. Being able to attach several more zvols would be nice but even being able to get at c1d0 would be useful Am I missing something or can I only attach to hda/hdb/hdd?

I got four phones: 601 is a SIP phone (no brand) 615 is Snom 190 621 is a Grand stream 628 is a remote SIP phone (no brand) 601, 615, 628 can call each other without any problems 621 used to be able to call remote 628, but after upgrade to CVS Head Nov. 11 the remote party cannot hear me. 615 never could call remote 628, both party hear nothing. 601 can always call 628 [Oct 16 00:52:13] --

>From my investigations, and searching the archives, it seems that smbfs can only mount shares, and not directories under the share i.e. smbmount //host/share /mnt works smbmount //host/share/directory /mnt doesn't work Our W2K3 server has user home directories in a tree where there are no user rights to the next node up the tree (level1), which is the directory on the share, i.e.

As some folks on irc have pointed out, and has been covered a bit in the beta discussions: There is no longer a 'Minimal' install option for centos5 in anaconda, however if you choose 'Customize Now' and uncheck all the selections, you will get a minimal install that only requires disk1, and weighs in at around 594MB. With kickstart it is possible to further reduce the package

I installed a debian squeeze desktop client today and a squeeze, with xen 4, on one of our servers. I had problems getting libvirt on the client to create virtual machines on the server. The fix was to create a symbolic link called xen to /usr/lib64/xen-4.0 on the server as libvirt was looking for files in that path. Is there anything else I should be aware of/issues regarding this setup? I

I'm about to install 3.4.5 over 3.0.4 on an old FreeBSD 5.2.1 server from source. The server is backed up to tape. Could I make life easier by backing up some files by hand to another directory? In theory should "make install" be all I have to do? (yes I ran configure and make) Will the old smb.conf need modified? Anything else to watch out for?

We have to replace one mail store (foo.example.org) with another (bar.example.org). I rsync'd the maildirs from foo to bar today and the plan is to hold all delivery (in the SMTP server) on foo over the weekend, rsync again (this time it should be much faster since the large xfer already occurred today), then flush the SMTP queue on foo towards bar, direct all new deliveries to

I've decided to share my experiences with the list in hopes that it will help someone else doing something similar avoid the problems I experienced, and hopefully, have a better experience. Here's the scope of my project: Original installation: - Samba 2.2.x series server - Workgroup security (read: local security, not domain security) - no domain controller - password database is

I created a DomU with a dedicated network connection script path=''/usr/lib/xen/scripts/vif-dedicated'' Having run the virtual machine I now destroy the domain, undefine it, change the script to script path=''/usr/lib/xen/scripts/vif-vnic'' define the domain and try to start it. This fails. If I change the assigned MAC address the newly defined virtual

I recently upgraded a codebase to use LLVM 3.9.0, up from 3.7.1. All seems to work well, except that I am unable to generate debug information. However, if I run objdump -g on the generated object file, it reports that the compile unit has no children: Contents of the .debug_abbrev section: Number TAG (0x0) 1 DW_TAG_compile_unit [no children] DW_AT_producer DW_FORM_strp

Hi sambafolks, I see a number of topics cropping up here repeatedly over the last few weeks: * Files > 4GB not supported This is confirmed and solved in 2.2.7a, but not in the current incarnation of smbfs (which is not part of samba, I know, but will get discussed here as a related topic) * desktop.ini weirdness in profiles I've seen this mentioned a few times with no sign of a

Are you perhaps not calling void Function::setSubprogram (DISubprogram * SP) http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a05a19abc8ee11d5909275d980efa1670 ? -- adrian > On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (+Adrian who might have some more context here) > > Generally I'd suggest looking at Clang's code to see how