similar to: Adding zvols to a DomU

We are running 4 Solaris10u7 DomUs on a b113 Dom0 I''d like to upgrade the Dom0 to b122 but not rebuild the DomUs. Below is a typical DomU xml dump. Is there anything obvious that will bite me in upgrading from 113 to 122? Thanks John virsh # dumpxml achilles2 <domain type=''xen'' id=''1''> <name>achilles2</name>

I created a DomU with a dedicated network connection script path=''/usr/lib/xen/scripts/vif-dedicated'' Having run the virtual machine I now destroy the domain, undefine it, change the script to script path=''/usr/lib/xen/scripts/vif-vnic'' define the domain and try to start it. This fails. If I change the assigned MAC address the newly defined virtual

>From my investigations, and searching the archives, it seems that smbfs can only mount shares, and not directories under the share i.e. smbmount //host/share /mnt works smbmount //host/share/directory /mnt doesn't work Our W2K3 server has user home directories in a tree where there are no user rights to the next node up the tree (level1), which is the directory on the share, i.e.

Many thanks for all the help with this, it looks very promising for what we are trying to do. I'm following on from this and still getting problems, probably from my own lack of knowledge. If I do: root@ma:~# mount -t smb -o username=test //time.cfs/usershare1$ /mnt Password: root@ma:~# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on .. other file systems ..

On Friday 4th March 2005, Steven French said, in part: > I did some experiments and confirmed that for this "deep mapping" > (http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/w2kdmap.html) mount of > a complex target ie \\server\share\dir > 1) the path component following the share name is not sent by windows (it > is sent by linux cifs and smbfs - and samba then

I''m running a ubuntu 9.04 64 bit dom0 with kernel 2.6.29.6 and xen 3.4.0. My eth0 is bridged to br0 and to my guest VMs. The dom0 is running a dhcp server on br0 which is able to provide leases to physical machines on eth0, and also to a windows xp domU which is bridged to br0. However my open solaris 2009.6 domU is unable to obtain a dhcp lease. On the opensolaris side I can see this:

I mounted an iso file like so: ------------------------------------------- # mount -o loop=/dev/loop0 /path/to/iso /tmp/mnt #ls /tmp/mnt cdromupgrade  dists  doc  install  isolinux  md5sum.txt  pics  pool  preseed  README.diskdefines  ubuntu ------------------------------------------- I used the following file to try to have pygrub boot the mounted iso: -------------------------------------------

Hi, I am trying to run solaris 10 (9/10) on Xen 3.4 (centos5.5 as dom0) in HVM mode. I can see the realtek 8139 network adapters when I do pciscan but ''ifconfig -a'' just lists loopback device. I can load rtls drivers but still these realtek interfaces are not available. I found a link which does say The rtls driver from Realtek still uses version 0 interfaces that are now

Hello, I''m currently trying to understand some problems I had in the past with mixing look-back with blktap(2) for HV and PV domains. I''m stuck reading the source code, so I''d like to get some help from the list. Interrupt me if I got something fundamentally wrong in my understanding so far: 1. With pure-HV the domU gets an emulated IDE (or whatever) disk. The

A colleague just asked if zfs delegation worked with zvols too. Thought I''d give it a go and got myself in a mess (tank/linkfixer is the delegated dataset): root at non-global / # zfs create -V 500M tank/linkfixer/foo cannot create device links for ''tank/linkfixer/foo'': permission denied cannot create ''tank/linkfixer/foo'': permission denied Ok, so

Before I post to networking-discuss I wanted to ask if anyone had tried this on this: I''m trying to run a dhcp-server on a dom0 over a vnic so that the domU''s can get IP addresses. I created a vnic r1 over e1000g0 and gave it a static IP 172.0.94.111/24 so I can run the dhcp server over this vnic. root@lm2-dom0:~# dhtadm -P Name Type Value

Can you use a different zvol for dump and swap rather than using the swap and dump zvol created by liveupgrade? Casper

I''ve been seeing read and write performance pathologies with Linux ext3 over iSCSI to zvols, especially with small writes. Does running a journalled filesystem to a zvol turn the block storage into swiss cheese? I am considering serving ext3 journals (and possibly swap too) off a raw, hardware-mirrored device. Before I do (and I''ll write up any results) I''d like to know

Hi, Is there any way to add VNIC to the domU? # virsh attach-interface mydomU network myvnic1 # libvir: XML error : missing source information for device myvnic1 It''s SXCE105. -- Regards, Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072 http://estseg.blogspot.com

Hi Is there an interface to get/set properties for a zvol (given its /dev/ pathname) from the solaris kernel ? Also is there a way to register callbacks to get notified in a kernel module when a property changes for a zvol ? Thanks Sumit -- This messages posted from opensolaris.org

I have a customer who has implemented the following layout: As you can see, he has mostly raidz zvols but has one raidz2 in the same zpool. What are the implications here? Is this a bad thing to do? Please elaborate. Thanks, Scott Gaspard Scott.J.Gaspard at Sun.COM > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > chipool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > >

Not an really good subject, I know but that''s kind of what happend. I''m trying to build an backup-solution server, Windows users using OSCAR (which uses rsync) to sync their files to an folder and when complete takes a snapshot. It has worked before but then I turned on the -R switch to rsync and when I then removed the folder with rm -rf it crashed. I didn''t save what

Gurus; I''ve been running Solaris 10 on a HVM domain on my machine (running SXCE snv_93 x86) for some time now. Now that Solaris 10 Update 6 (10/08) has been released, I tried creating a Paravirtualized Guest domain but got the same error message I got previously... # virt-install -n sol10 -p -r 1560 --nographics -f /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/sol10 -l /stage/sol-10-u6-> Starting

Hey, I''m currently running on Nexenta alpha 6 and I have some corrupted data in a pool. The output from sudo zpool status -v data is: pool: data > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data > corruption. Applications may be affected. > action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the > entire

I''d like to enhance Solaris network configuration slightly to allow guest domain IPv4 details to be passed from the domain building control tools through to the relevant components in Solaris (svc:/network/physical and uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs_dlinet.c). Attached is a proposal, roughly in the form of a fasttrack. Diffs for a prototype are at: