similar to: Re: Basic getting-started help point

Hi Lin, In addition to bug 6541114... Bug ID 6541114 Synopsis GRUB/ZFS fails to load files from a default compressed (lzjb) root ... I found yet another way to get the "Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure" from GRUB. This time when trying to boot a Xen Dom0 from a zfs bootfs Synopsis: grub/zfs-root: cannot boot xen from a zfs root

Hi, I have the following partions on my laptop, Inspiron 6000, from fdisk: 1 Other OS 0 11 12 0 2 EXT LBA 12 2561 2550 26 3 Active Solaris2 2562 9728 7167 74 First one is for Dell utilities. Second one is NTFS and the third is ZFS. I am currently using OpenSolaris 2009.06

Using build 70, I followed the zfsboot instructions at http:// www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ to the letter. I tried first with a mirror zfsroot, when I try to boot to zfsboot the screen is flooded with "init(1M) exited on fatal signal 9" Than I tried with a simple zfs pool (not mirrored) and it just reboots right away. If I try to setup grub

Hi all Opensolaris works perfectly, but I am not able to boot the xvm kernel on this hardware. I added the -k option in grub, but the system hangs before the hostname line without any debug info. I''ve tried snv from b94 to b99, with the same results. If I install Debian with xen kernel I am able to use pvm and hvm guests. What can I do ? thanks Giacomo -- This message posted from

I''ve hit this bug on my home machine couple of times and finally decided to log it since I''ve spend 2 days configuring my "OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86" and after installing the SUNWsmbfskr package I ended up in the grub> menu. The package contains a necessary module for CIFS. After pkg install SUNWsmbfskr, I rebooted the box. There was no grub menu anymore

hi all Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. add a new disks (16GB) create zpool rpool run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool run luactivate zfsroot run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in next boot init 6 but it come up with UFS root, lustatus show ufsroot active zpool rpool is mounted but not used by boot Is this a

Is it possible to convert Solaris 10 DomU from hvm to pv?? Dom0 is Opensolaris b132. Possibly any Documentation about this? Here is config of Solaris DomU: <domain type=''xen'' id=''1''> <name>Solaris-10</name> <uuid>c505f6c3-b37b-8268-fe46-f10b3277238b</uuid> <memory>2097152</memory>

Hi, I have installed b_78 on a Dell 2950 and booting to bare metal works fine but when I try to boot using the grub entry Solaris xVM it will boot to the point where it displays the uname info and then just stays there. It will not boot past that point. I have enabled VT technology in the BIOS (but only after the installation). Where/what can I look at to trouble shoot this? I am new to xen and

After BFU-ing my system to b75 I ended up with a panicing system when booting into Xen: grub> #---------- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT ---------- grub> title Solaris on Xen grub> kernel$ /boot/$ISADIR/xen.gz grub> module$ /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/unix /platform/i86xpv/kernel/$ISADIR/unix -B console=ttyb grub> module$ /platform/i86pc/$ISADIR/boot_archive grub>

Hi all, I have a Toshiba Tecra M9 and have not been able to boot it dom0. This is running SXDE 01/08, snv79b. After booting under kmdb and setting moddebug=80000000 before booting the Solaris kernel (with help from Dan Mick), I was able to see mac_ether as the last thing loading, right after loading the e1000g driver. I cannot drop into kmdb via F1-A after it hangs. I''ve also

The device name prefix for IDE hard drives used to be `ad' but now is `ada' (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-naming.html). For virtio hard drives it is `vtbd'. Under an mbr partition table a slice will be used, so the name of the first partitions will be either ada0s1a or vtbd0s1a. Under a GPT partition table, where no slice is needed, the name of the first partition will be

Make a best effort try to map NetBSD disklabel partitions to Linux partitions. The mapping will be incorrect if there is a gap in the disklabel partitions sequence, e.g. 'b' (swap) partition is missing but 'e' partition is defined. Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@grnet.gr> --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 26

Make a best effort try to map NetBSD disklabel partitions to Linux partitions. The mapping will be incorrect if there is a gap in the disklabel partitions sequence, e.g. 'b' (swap) partition is missing but 'e' partition is defined. Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@grnet.gr> --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 26

Take into granted that partition 'c' has a special purpose. It has always the same size as the enclosing slice and is not mapped under Linux. This is a best effort try. The mapping will be incorrect if there is a gap in the disklabel partitions sequence, e.g. 'b' (swap) partition is missing but 'd' partition is defined. Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos

Take into granted that partition 'c' has a special purpose. It has always the same size as the enclosing slice and is not mapped under Linux. This is a best effort try. The mapping will be incorrect if there is a gap in the disklabel partitions sequence, e.g. 'b' (swap) partition is missing but 'd' partition is defined. Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos

Hello: I successfully installed Solaris10 nv77 x86 on my Compaq NX6325 laptop with the following specs: - Mobile AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 (dual core 64bit). - 4GB RAM. The installation destination was an external 120GB USB 2.0 drive. I was able to successfully boot into regular Solaris, but not into xVM Solaris. Meaning, after highlighting the xVM menu item and pressing enter, the screen turns

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Nikos Skalkotos wrote: > + char type_c = (strcmp (type, "vtbd") == 0) ? 'v' : 's'; > int disk_i = guestfs___parse_unsigned_int (g, disk); > int slice_i = guestfs___parse_unsigned_int (g, slice); > int part_i = part[0] - 'a' /* counting from 0 */; > @@ -1481,7 +1501,7 @@ resolve_fstab_device

Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@grnet.gr> --- src/guestfs-internal.h | 1 + src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- src/inspect-fs.c | 12 ++++++ 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/guestfs-internal.h b/src/guestfs-internal.h index 33d28f5..c8dd084 100644 --- a/src/guestfs-internal.h +++

Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@grnet.gr> --- src/guestfs-internal.h | 1 + src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- src/inspect-fs.c | 12 ++++++ 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/guestfs-internal.h b/src/guestfs-internal.h index 33d28f5..c8dd084 100644 --- a/src/guestfs-internal.h +++

On 5/5/10 1:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote: >> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it''s an EFI lable? >> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 >> # cat x >> >> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320 > > # dd