similar to: Attempt to ssh to remote SNV93 box from CentOS 5.1 DomU at SNV93 Dom0

******************************************** Same nfs share works fine for virt-install. ******************************************** Unable to complete install ''exceptions.ValueError Invalid file location given: No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 699, in do_install dom =

************************ Installation profile ************************ [root@ServerRHL51 vm]# cat snv85.install name = "Solaris85pvm" vcpus = 1 memory = "1024" kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-solaris/unix-85" ramdisk = "/usr/lib/xen-solaris/x86.miniroot-85" extra = "/platform/i86xpv/kernel/amd64/unix - nowin -B install_media=cdrom" disk =

I''m running snv93. I''m trying to install a windows hvm domU using the virt-install command: /usr/bin/virt-install -n windowsts -r 2048 -s 20 -f /data/domU/windowsts --hvm --vnc -c /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s2 The vncviewer is unable to open a connection to the xend VNC server and is failing with the Connection refused (146) error message. xend is set up with the following properties:

System config:- bash-3.2# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.1.53 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 0:1e:8c:25:cc:a5 lo0:

Bill, your CentOS 5 RTL8110 page should probably be updated. I've confirmed that there's a newer r8169 driver in the kernel that works with the RTL8110. RealTek's web site now carries the new r8169 instead of the r1000. The newer driver fixed a problem I was having on one host so we should probably recommend it over the older r1000. I've updated my CentOS 4 page. Kirk Bocek

While attempting to install snv_85 as a domU, Debian etch as the dom0, the kernel panics before the rest of the system starts to boot. Currently I''m using the sid releases of xen 3.2 found in Debian sid. I stopped using 3.0.3, as it appears I''m unable to use a ramdisk setting. # dmesg | grep -i mem ... Memory: 1903728k/1949252k available (1623k kernel code, 36208k reserved,

Hello: I'm having issues with my CentOS 5.1/Xen installation. If I run the xen-bridge, I seem to get flaky ethernet. By flaky I mean everything seems fine from the host machine, but if I attempt to contact the host machine from another remote machine (eg. my laptop which is on the same subnet as the xen machine, separated by 10 ft of cable and a router) I either get extremely high ping

Hi There is a problem when creating a domU. I intend to install Solaris N90 on RedHat RHEL5 in paravirtualized(I''ve tried fully virtualized method, that''s no problem). #xm info release : 2.6.18-53.el5xen machine : i686 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_32p My steps are as follow(install via NFS): 1 mkdir disk and mkdir Solaris 2 mount /dev/cdrom /disk/Solaris, it tell me that disk

I have the box dual booting SNV85 Dom0 and F8 Dom0. Both Dom0s utilize same ethernet interface for connection to ADSL Modem acting as DHCP Bridge (ZyXEL P660RT2). Both Dom0s obtain IP adress from ISP at boot up with no problems. 1. When i install SNV85 DomU at F8 Dom0 ( vif=['' '']) with DHCP option it gets IP adress from ISP in 1-2 min 2. When i virt-install SNV85 DomU at

Hello: I'm having issues with my CentOS 5.1/Xen installation. If I run the xen-bridge, I seem to get flaky ethernet. By flaky I mean everything seems fine from the host machine, but if I attempt to contact the host machine from another remote machine (eg. my laptop which is on the same subnet as the xen machine, separated by 10 ft of cable and a router) I either get extremely high ping

On 1/26/24 09:34, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 1/26/24 02:35, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> The share mounts and I am a member of the correct groups >>> CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ cat /etc/fstab //fs.carlson.lab/test >>> /mnt/test

Hi, After updating from 7.0-RELEASE to STABLE (around 15/08) my NIC refuses to handle large file transfers. pciconf -lv re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001a6409 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'RTL8110SB Single-Chip Gigabit LOM Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet Log

# lofiadm -a /export/home/isos/f8.iso /dev/lofi/1 # mount -o ro -F hsfs /dev/lofi/1 /mnt # share -F nfs /mnt Start virt-install :- # virt-install -n F8PVM --ram 1024 --nographics -p \ -f /dev/zvol/dsk/xvmpool/f8-disk -l nfs:192.168.1.42:/mnt -d Starting install... libvir: Xen Daemon error : GET operation failed: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:12:44 DEBUG Preparing mount at

Good day, this is new error for me can you help me please ? from log: [2004/12/01 12:45:44, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(270) podskalsky closed file Podskalsky/HALINatd/pribehy/vaic/dosly k vrcholu uz pod vrcholem 40 r.doc (numopen=0) [2004/12/01 12:45:44, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (192.168.1.54) [2004/12/01 12:45:59, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(113)

Hey ppl can you help me i when i am trying to run world of warcraft in wine i get a error i can login fine but after about 3 sec after i entered world so i can se my char i crash this is what terminal says.. Code: wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 0x00000000 at address (nil) (thread 0025), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: page fault on execute access to 0x00000000 in

I am using a Polycom 501 SIP phone behind NAT. Asterisk server is public with no NAT... everything works on the Asterisk end just fine EXCEPT that I can never check voice mail After about 30 seconds the call drops with these messagess: [Sep 30 23:47:48] WARNING[26819]: chan_sip.c:1950 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 320893f1-50c13ba3-78c26164 at 192.168.1.54 for seqno 2

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=

Hi, I have been trying a (really simple) push application for the Polycom microbrowser, using a Polycom 650 with 3.2 firmware. I can't do anything, I always get "Push message cannot be displayed" back from the Polycom phone, and all I am sending is the Polycom example : <PolycomIPPhone> <Data priority=?critical?> <h1> Fire Drill at 2pm </h1>

Hi all Can someone explain me this: ifcfg-eth0-range1: ONBOOT="yes" IPADDR_START="192.168.1.48" IPADDR_END="192.168.1.55" CLONENUM_START="1" Why Bcast is 192.168.1.51 and why Mask is 255.255.255.252 ? OS: Centos 6.3/64bit Thanks Levi # ifconfig eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:9C:02:99:FA:00 inet addr:192.168.1.48

Hi, My problem is about DNS names resolution in case there are two DNS servers separated by a VPN and one DNS domain name. Context: two Samba AD DC on each side of the VPN, one forest, one domain, one site, two subnets. Note that this target configuration is not yet operational since I'm trying to make the DSN names resolution work first through the VPN. The DNS servers are Samba internal