similar to: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:03.zfs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:03.zfs"

2010 Apr 01
0
HEADS UP: FreeBSD 7.2 EoL coming soon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On June 30th, FreeBSD 7.2 will reach its End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of this release are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 7.3 before that date; FreeBSD 7.3 will be supported until the end of March 2012. Please note that since FreeBSD 7.1 has been designated for
2010 Apr 01
0
HEADS UP: FreeBSD 7.2 EoL coming soon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On June 30th, FreeBSD 7.2 will reach its End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of this release are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 7.3 before that date; FreeBSD 7.3 will be supported until the end of March 2012. Please note that since FreeBSD 7.1 has been designated for
2010 Feb 04
0
FreeBSD supported branches update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been updated to reflect the EoL (end-of-life) of FreeBSD 6.3. The new list is below and at <URL: http://security.freebsd.org/ >. Users of FreeBSD 6.3 are advised to upgrade promptly to a newer release, either by downloading an updated source tree and building updates
2010 Feb 04
0
FreeBSD supported branches update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been updated to reflect the EoL (end-of-life) of FreeBSD 6.3. The new list is below and at <URL: http://security.freebsd.org/ >. Users of FreeBSD 6.3 are advised to upgrade promptly to a newer release, either by downloading an updated source tree and building updates
2009 Jun 10
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-09:09.pipe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-09:09.pipe Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Local information disclosure via direct pipe writes Category: core Module: kern
2010 Jul 01
0
FreeBSD supported branches update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been updated to reflect the EoL (end-of-life) of FreeBSD 7.2. The new list is below and at <URL: http://security.freebsd.org/ >. Users of FreeBSD 7.2 are advised to upgrade promptly to a newer release, either by downloading an updated source tree and building updates
2010 Jul 01
0
FreeBSD supported branches update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been updated to reflect the EoL (end-of-life) of FreeBSD 7.2. The new list is below and at <URL: http://security.freebsd.org/ >. Users of FreeBSD 7.2 are advised to upgrade promptly to a newer release, either by downloading an updated source tree and building updates
2013 Nov 25
7
[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 -
2008 Aug 27
0
buildworld of 7-STABLE fails on 6.3 in CDDL code?
Hi, Has anyone seen this before? I'm trying to build 7-STABLE on 6.3. I've removed everything from /usr/obj* but buildworld still fails. Maybe it's got something to do with recent dtrace MFC? -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src;
2012 Jul 03
1
buildworld fails with clang
Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib
2009 Jun 24
0
FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-09:03.fxp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-EN-09:03.fxp Errata Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: Poor TCP performance of fxp(4) Category: core Module: sys/dev Announced: 2009-06-24 Credits: Bjoern Koenig <bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de> Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@FreeBSD.org> Affects:
2009 Apr 08
0
zpool history coredump
Pawel, another one (though minor, I suppose) bug report: while playing with my poor pool, I tried to interact with it on -current, thus importing it with -f (without upgrading, of course). After reverting to RELENG_7, I found I no more can access history: root@moose:~# /usr/obj/usr/src/cddl/sbin/zpool/zpool history History for 'm': 2008-10-14.23:04:28 zpool create m raidz ad4h ad6h
2015 Apr 28
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as > > this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL > > in order to make the whole be under GPL. > > The GPL doesn't require that you relicense
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as > this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL > in order to make the whole be under GPL. The GPL doesn't require that you relicense any non-GPL parts of the whole. It requires that the whole "be licensed ... at no
2009 Mar 22
0
FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-09:01.kenv
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-EN-09:01.kenv Errata Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: Kernel panic when dumping environment Category: core Module: kern Announced:
2008 Dec 22
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-08:12.ftpd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-08:12.ftpd Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Cross-site request forgery in ftpd(8) Category: core Module: ftpd Announced:
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. >> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy: > > http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue It is
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > >> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions. > >> > >> OK, great. That clears it up then. > > > > Maybe this helps: > > >
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. > >> > >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > > > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > >> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions. >> >> OK, great. That clears it up then. > > Maybe this helps: > > The BSD license does not permit to relicense the code, so you cannot put BSD > code under the