Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "acts_as_paranoid and :include"
2007 Jan 08
2
Two problems with Acts_as_paranoid
Hi,
I''ve run into two small problems with acts_as_paranoid and wondered if
anyone else has experienced them as well (and if yes, if they have any
solutions).
1. When using has_many :through, AAP doesn''t seem to take into account
the fact that your join model might also be paranoid. My solution to
this at the moment is to add an explicit conditions clause to the
has_many
2008 Apr 15
1
acts_as_paranoid Unknown key(s): with_deleted
Trying this straight from the README:
I have acts_as_paranoid in my model (Course), and added the deleted_at
column.
This is OK:
Course.find_with_deleted(:all)
Course.find(:all, :with_deleted => true)
gives:
ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): with_deleted
from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.0.2/lib/
active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:49:in `assert_valid_keys''
2005 Dec 11
4
Problem with acts_as_paranoid: "ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group"
Here''s the full error:
1) Error:
test_add_message_to_existing_ticket(TicketTest):
ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.2.4/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:48:in
`assert_valid_keys''
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/acts_as_paranoid-0.2/lib/acts_as_paranoid.rb:125:in
`validate_find_options''
2006 Jan 31
2
find_by_sql question
I''m no good at SQL and I have a question that will hopefully be fairly
easy to answer.
I''m using acts_as_paranoid which instead of deleting a record adds a
deleted_at column with the datetime the row was deleted. I want to have
a find_by_sql filter out any row where deleted_at is not null.
I have (at least the relevant parts):
#a couple working filters here.
filters <<
2006 May 20
1
acts_as_paranoid overrides ActiveRecord::Base??
Guys,
I am trying to figure out what exactly does this line do at the end of
"acts_as_paranoid" plugin?
ActiveRecord::Base.send :include, Caboose::Acts::Paranoid::ActiveRecord
My problem: I have some classes that I use acts_as_paranoid, and others
with tagging support. Classes declared as taggable, throw error, which
appears to be in the acts_as_paranoid version of the
2006 May 11
0
acts_as_paranoid, aliasing and nested scopes in Rails 1.1
I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The aliasing of
find and so the nested scope does not seem to work at all, when
combining it with similar plugins.
The description:
I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it
to ''acts_as_very_new''(just a nonsense plugin for testing), and
simplified the code (original code
2006 Mar 02
4
Getting Acts_as_Paranoid to work with validates_uniqueness_of
Hello
I''ve been using Acts_as_Parnoid for a while and it has been working well
but I am now having a slight issue with it. I have a company table were
I would like to use validates_uniqueness_of :company_name. This
validation works if a company exists in the database and has not been
deleted. However, I also would like the validates_uniqueness_of to
work if a company has
2006 Aug 06
5
Return only results that user is allowed to see?
Is it possible with acts_as_ferret to somehow restrict the results that
are returned?
For instance, I don''t want to return results that are logically deleted
with acts_as_paranoid (deleted_at IS NOT NULL and deleted_at < now()).
Also, if a user is not an Admin, they should not be able to return
results that have a certain value in a certain column, like forum_id !=
13 (if 13 is
2006 Jul 10
0
Strange acts_as_paranoid behavior
Using the acts_as_paranoid plugin with rails 1.1.4 (model also uses
acts_as_threaded and acts_as_taggable) and getting some unexplainable behavior.
The following tests:
assert_equal Conv.count, num
assert_equal Conv.count_with_deleted, CONVS_TOTAL
Produce the following SQL:
SQL (0.000000) SELECT count(*) AS count_all FROM convs WHERE ((
convs.deleted_at IS NULL OR convs.deleted_at
2007 Aug 03
0
acts_as_paranoid and Association Extensions (has_one troubles)
Hi... Isn''t there a proper way or hack/workaround for the following?
* For the example with unfortunate disabilities.. look below,,,
Usage of has_* (associationmethods) do {def with_deleted
AccociatedModel#with_scope} {Paranoid''s#find_with_deleted}...
The has_one associations give me a nil object when invoking it with
Model.association_OBJECT.with_deleted. Has_many does like
2005 Nov 15
1
acts_as_paranoid --> undefined method `constrain' for class `Class'
Hi All,
So I thought I had this acts_as_paranoid problem previously and fixed by
going to rails 0.14.2, although I''m not 100% it was the same thing.
I''m now on rails 0.14.3 and I''m getting:
undefined method `constrain'' for class `Class''
for any model that includes acts_as_paranoid. My application trace is below.
Has anyone else got this and know a
2008 Feb 12
0
acts_as_paranoid: has_one_paranoid
Hi all,
Ran in to a problem with AR::B#find(:include) and acts_as_paranoid,
well described here:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/57945
So I whipped up this thing, which seems to work for me:
module ActiveRecord
class Base
def self.has_one_paranoid(*args)
ref = create_has_one_reflection *args
cond = args.last[:conditions]
cond = cond.blank? ? '''' : cond
2005 Nov 03
12
Installation of plugins/gems/mix-ins confusion
I''m running 0.14.2 and am a little confused as to the best way to
install mix-ins. I''m specifically using "acts_as_paranoid" as an
example (as it is one of the simpler implementations). It is a gem and
can be "installed" as a gem, but then what''s the best way to integrate
it into my app (require_gem?). I''ve seen recommendations to require it
2007 May 11
3
is_active?
Hey all, i''m rather new to rails and was curious if ActiveRecord
implemented anything like is_active where the delete functions would
just mark records as inactive, vs deleting rows. (similar to created_at,
etc). I need a history of transactions, and this is how I would code in
other languages. Any advice? Is there are smarter way to implement this?
Thanks in advance!
--
Posted via
2009 Nov 20
7
Soft Deletes
Hello all,
I am wondering how people here are handling soft deletes in Rails.
I''ve need a couple of gems/plugins that seem to handle this but from
what I gather development has stopped on them.
All I need to do right now is mark something as deleted in the
DB...nothing fancy.
I''m thinking that the simple addition of a deleted_at column, some
named scopes (maybe even a default
2008 Sep 25
1
Will acts_as_paranoid work with attachment_fu?
I''ve got a problem in that users are deleting a paranoid model through
the application, including dependents. Some of these dependents are
paranoid too, but not the attachments. (I''m using DB file storage.) I
need to be able to un-delete these things and I''m now wondering if
acts_as_paranoid will work with models that use attachment_fu? If so, in
what model to I add the
2008 Apr 17
4
acts_as_paranoid is making me crazy
Acts_as_paranoid is giving me a headache when performing migrations.
For some reason when I perform a migration I get a "stack level too
deep" error. If I comment out the database inserts that are performed
(countries, regions, and a base admin) it works well. Even after
minimizing the data that is inserted on the migration to one record it
still throws the same error.
When running
2008 Oct 14
1
Starting Server gives an error
Hi,
I had created a new environment and tried to start the webrick server
for that environment but it is giving an error:-
E:/demo/vendor/rails/railties/lib/commands/servers/
webrick.rb:11: warning: already initialized constant OPTIONS
E:/demo/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_suppo
rt/dependencies.rb:249:in `load_missing_constant'': Expected E:/Demo
2006 Mar 24
6
Should counter_cache fields be saved in the database?
As far as I can tell, the counter_cache option on a belongs_to model
doesn''t actually save anything in the database. For example, I have
the following models:
class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :children,
:conditions => "deleted_at IS NULL"
end
class Child < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :parent, :counter_cache => true
end
With the following
2006 Mar 22
15
Rails-1.1.0-RC1 tagged today (4010)
Looks like Rails 1.1.0 RC1 is finally here:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4010
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.