similar to: Re: Re: Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Re: Re: Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable"

2009 Sep 02
20
Re: i686 vs i586 glibc segfault issue on 64-bit AMD Xen paravirt guests
On 09/02/09 01:10, Mitchell E Berger wrote: > I apologize for writing to you directly instead of through an officially > supported channel. No problem. > I''ve filed a bug against glibc in Redhat''s Bugzilla > for an issue that only seems to surface on 64-bit Xen paravirt guests > on AMD hosts. Filing this bug with the distro involved seemed to make > sense,
2009 Sep 09
4
Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12. Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1. Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong''s ''rc7.git4''  kernel for F12. Boris. --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Boris
2009 Sep 16
6
Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
Are you expecting improvement after  09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ? 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. Boris.   _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2010 Jan 03
21
Re: Xenified linux kernel
Known bug for 32-bit. Workaround is on the net. http://mulps.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/compiling-xen-kernel-2-6-29-2/ Boris ________________________________ From: Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@gmail.com> To: bderzhavets@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 4:25:00 PM Subject: Xenified linux kernel Hi Dear: I am refering to the
2010 Mar 26
14
Xen on Intel i7 Nehalem?
Hello, i´ve got a new Intel Nehalem server with an i7-920 CPU. I installed a Debian Lenny OS ... Now, i cannot find any images for hypervisor or kernel that seem to be runable on that hardware. :-O All of that is AMD: apt-cache search hypervisor linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6 image on AMD64, oldstyle Xen support linux-image-xen-amd64 - Linux image on AMD64, oldstyle Xen support
2011 Mar 01
14
virt-manager 0.8.2 local ISO and PXE boot install option greyed out on 2.6.32.27 pv-ops Dom0 kernel
Hi, I just installed a pv-ops Dom0 2.6.32.27 Kernel on a 64 bit non VT machine. Following instructions here http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 for 64 bit Ubuntu 10.04 apt-get install bcc bin86 gawk bridge-utils iproute libcurl3 libcurl4-openssl-dev bzip2 module-init-tools transfig tgif texinfo texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-extra texlive-fonts-recommended
2009 Jul 22
109
Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy''s PVOPS Kernel
Hi All, I followed the instructions here at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ However, when I do a "make menuconfig", I cannot see any XEN related configuration options. What am I missing? Thank you. Mr. Teo En Ming Dip(Mechatronics Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
2009 Aug 24
18
Current 2.6.3x kernel and patches for Ubuntu 9.04?
Are these the current functional procedures for dropping a dom0 on a jaunty 64 bit server? xen-tools: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/attempt-of-prevu-xen-3-4-1-hypervisor-on-ubuntu-jaunty-server-64-bit/ kernel: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/building-xenified-2-6-30-1-kernel-via-xen-patches-2-6-30-2-tar-bz2/ Regarding the patches used in the above procedure from here:
2009 Aug 22
6
Fw: Re: my bootlog
Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel
2010 Oct 27
25
xend does not start
Hello, I''ve downloaded the xen 4.0.1 version as it is explained here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 <http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0>So, I''ve made a clone from repository, with the following command: hg clone -r RELEASE-4.0.1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg And finally I''ve built xen, tools and stubdom. I was looking for a
2010 Oct 27
25
xend does not start
Hello, I''ve downloaded the xen 4.0.1 version as it is explained here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 <http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0>So, I''ve made a clone from repository, with the following command: hg clone -r RELEASE-4.0.1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg And finally I''ve built xen, tools and stubdom. I was looking for a
2009 Aug 10
4
FC11 and pv_ops kernel
Is there a version of the pv_ops kernel that will do HVM and work with fc11? I have been failing miserably trying to get it to work. I have followed Boris''s guide at: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ But have had no success so far. I am wanting to know what is the version of the pv_ops
2009 Jul 04
3
OpenSolaris 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 with 2.6.30 vs 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel
Andy, OSOL 2009.06 been installed in stub domain (hvm domain) at mentioned Dom0 with 2.6.30 xenified kernel via xen-patches-2.6.30-2.tar.bz2 refuse to activate PV drivers. When same Dom0 starts with 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel (xen-patches-2.6.29-6.tar.bz2) kernel OSOL 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain does activate PV drivers for xdf, xnf . Boris
2009 May 23
10
Crash DomU and after it Dom0 is frozen.
Hello! I installed NexentaOS (Opensolaris kernel b104+). First booting system is true. Before first rebooting system updates boot_archive. It''s false. Computer is freeze and CapsLock and ScrollLock is blinking. Helps only RESET button. My system is Ubuntu 8.10, kernel-2.6.30-rc3-tip, Xen-3.4-Stable with debug options enabled. My hardware: AMD Athlon64X2 5400+, RAM 4GB. For DomU: mem=1024,
2009 Nov 12
20
VIRQ_CON_RING
Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in
2009 Nov 12
20
VIRQ_CON_RING
Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in
2010 Apr 08
23
Xen 4.0 on gentoo hotplug scripts problem?
Hi, Ive just tried Xen 4.0 on Gentoo with 2.6.32 (also tried 2.6.31) forward ported dom0 kernel, Xen itself seems to boot up successfully and everything else on the system is working normally, but when I try to start a domain xm create appears to hang and eventually I get a hotplug scripts error: Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/block failed; error detected.
2010 Apr 08
23
Xen 4.0 on gentoo hotplug scripts problem?
Hi, Ive just tried Xen 4.0 on Gentoo with 2.6.32 (also tried 2.6.31) forward ported dom0 kernel, Xen itself seems to boot up successfully and everything else on the system is working normally, but when I try to start a domain xm create appears to hang and eventually I get a hotplug scripts error: Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/block failed; error detected.
2010 May 20
4
Xen 4.0 build git
After download of Xen4.0, Is there a simple way to disable to not download from git implicitly ? (I already did it offline and would like to use that build instead.) Idea is: "make world" would not enforce git automatically. Any suggestions ? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2008 Jun 21
12
Bfu xVM to build 92 problems
Bfu 91 to 92 looks good Proceed with xVM upgrade . After running:- # sunos.hg/bin/build-all nondebug bash-3.2# cd packages-nondebug bash-3.2# pwd /usr/tmp/packages-nondebug bash-3.2# ls -l total 20 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWlibvirt drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWlibvirtr drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWurlgrabber