similar to: shadow OOS and fast path are incompatible

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "shadow OOS and fast path are incompatible"

2007 Jun 28
5
One question on MMIO
In sh_page_fault(), there are some code like following, why we think it is mmio only when paging_vcpu_mode_translate(v)? Thanks Yunhong Jiang /* What mfn is the guest trying to access? */ gfn = guest_l1e_get_gfn(gw.eff_l1e); gmfn = vcpu_gfn_to_mfn(v, gfn); mmio = (is_hvm_domain(d) && paging_vcpu_mode_translate(v) &&
2009 Oct 23
11
soft lockups during live migrate..
Trying to migrate a 64bit PV guest with 64GB running medium to heavy load on xen 3.4.0, it is showing lot of soft lockups. The softlockups are causing dom0 reboot by the cluster FS. The hardware has 256GB and 32 CPUs. Looking into the hypervisor thru kdb, I see one cpu in sh_resync_all() while all other 31 appear spinning on the shadow_lock. I vaguely remember seeing some thread on this while
2013 Oct 02
2
installing centos with oos ntfs format drives
greetings. i am going to run a fresh install of centos 6.4 and want to mount 3 partitions of oos that are formatted as ntfs in an oem installed box. if during install, i set up partitions /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2, and /dev/sdb1 as ntfs, will install install ntfs software or will i have to select it later on in installation? also, is it better to mount them under /mnt to keep /media clean? tia.
2009 Apr 22
7
Consult some concepts about shadow paging mechanism
Dear All: I am pretty new to xen-devel, please correct me in the following. Assume we have the following terms GPT: guest page table SPT: shadow page table (Question a) When guest OS is running, is it always using SPT for address translation? If it is the case, how does guest OS refer and modify its own GPT content? It seems that there is a page table entry in SPT for the GPT page. (Question
2008 Nov 20
10
issues with movnti emulation
We''ve got reports of that change causing HVM data corruption issues. While I can''t see what''s wrong with the patch, I''d suggest at least reverting it from the 3.3 tree (which is what our code is based upon) for the time being. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2010 Aug 05
6
[PATCH 10/14] Nested Virtualization: svm specific implementation
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list
2008 Sep 11
5
[PATCH] Fix arguments passed to SHADOW_PRINTK
Hi. When I compiled xen-3.3-testing with DEBUG_TRACE_DUMP in xen/include/xen/lib.h turned on, I got some errors at SHADOW_PRINTK. The following patch will fix the arguments passed to SHADOW_PRINTK in xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c and xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c. Although I haven''t tested, it is the same for xen-unstable.hg Thanks, Yoshi Signed-off-by: Yoshi Tamura
2010 Oct 15
6
[PATCH 01/13] Nested Virtualization: tools
-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2007 Jul 02
3
Walking an HVM''s shadow page tables and other memory management questions.
Hello, I''m new to Xen and especially to the hypervisor code. I''m working off a 3.0.4.1 base and have the following questions regarding the memory management code for an x86, 32-bit platform (capable of supporting PAE). I''m doing some research into providing grant table hypercall support from a Windows 2003 HVM. I have made all the necessary changes to allow the
2012 Jul 26
3
About revoke write access of all the shadows
Hi all, Recently, I read codes about the shadow page table. I''m wondering whether the kernel has provided the function to revoke write access of all the shadows of one domain. If you know one with this function, please tell me about it. Thanks. BTW, I have my own idea to implement this. My idea is as follows: void sh_revoke_write_access_all(struct domain *d) {
2007 Apr 13
18
A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823.
I''m not seeing the problem that Fan Zhao is reporting, instead I get this one. Not sure if ti''s the same one or a different problem... This happens with my simple-guest [i.e. not using hvmloader, as I described before]. This worked fine yesterday. (XEN) event_channel.c:178:d0 EVTCHNOP failure: domain 0, error -22, line 178 (XEN) bad shared page: 0 (XEN) domain_crash_sync called
2010 Oct 15
3
[PATCH 05/13] Nested Virtualization: CRn & paged real mode
-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2008 Jun 06
4
Query regarding x86_emulate_memop() function
Hi there, I have a question regarding the functionality of x86_emulate_memop (Xen 3.1) or x86_emulate (Xen 3.2) function. This function gets called from sh_page_fault() function which is invoked when Xen receives a page fault. Since I am not clear completely about the emulation operation performed by Xen, I have following questions with a below mentioned scenario? 1) Suppose I have a memory
2008 Feb 19
2
[PATCH] Minor fix to the fast emulation patch.
Hello, The fast emulation path patch introduced a bug when we have an event injection during a write to a pagetable: after removing shadows we still jump to the done label, releasing the lock even if we aren''t grabbing it. Inline patch fixes this. Signed-off-by: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com> diff -r 8848d9e07584 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c ---
2007 Aug 07
3
Why p2m allocation is from hap or shadow preallocated memory?
And can we make p2m memory allocation from domain heap directly? -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2009 Aug 26
6
can dom0 modify Shadow PT of HVM domU?
Hi all, Can Xen hypervisor modify HVM domU's Shadow page table, under the dom0's context, like trapped from dom0's hypercall? I think it have to call 2 functions at least: guest_walk_tables() and flush_tlb_all(). Can these 2 functions called in dom0's context? In my test, if hypervisor tries to modify HVM's shadow page table, it will bring down the whole system. I am not
2011 Feb 21
5
How to create shadow page table of my own?
Hi, guys Recently I have been doing some research & I''ve got in trouble. I have altered the kernel of domU and put the code section and data section of selinux security server which locate ~/security/selinux/ss into two seperate sections in the final vmlinux image(see below) objdump -h vmlinux vmlinux: file format elf32-i386 Sections: Idx Name Size VMA
2008 Jun 20
0
[PATCH 2/4] Out-of-sync L1 shadows: Fixup Tables
This patch implement a very simple non complete reverse map for OOS pages writable mappings to avoid shadow brute-force search on resyncs. Signed-off-by: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2008 Feb 22
3
FW: [PATCH][UPDATE]Remove lock on guest table walk
Is there any trouble with mailing list? I didn''t see my mail sent back after almost 8hrs. :-( Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Tian, Kevin Sent: 2008年2月22日 10:33 To: ''Tim Deegan'' Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: [PATCH][UPDATE]Remove lock on guest table walk >From: Tim Deegan >Sent: 2008年2月21日 22:13 >Hi, > >So, the idea seems
2013 Sep 20
4
hvmemul_rep_movs() vs MMIO
Tim, was it really intended for "x86/hvm: use unlocked p2m lookups in hvmemul_rep_movs()" to special case p2m_mmio_dm but not p2m_mmio_direct? Jan