similar to: RoR developers in China needed

Hi, having read "my job went to india" I decided to quit programming within the Microsoft environment and start something different... So, is there any RubyOnRails project that in exchange for "reviving" me needs a loyal (code) contributor? Thanks in advance Michael -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com > wrote: > > > On 1/28/16 4:00 PM, Yin Ma via cfe-dev wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> I assume you have a powerful machine. Our drive space is on network >> mounted >> >> machined by IT department. The machine is default Ubuntu setup with 8 >> cores. >>

The summary stats for the xin and yin variables below are correct. However, if I use plot(xin,yin), an exception is thrown saying that "object xin is not found." Also, it is apparent that I can't successfully replace the x and y vectors with values from xin and yin. The four plots on one panel are showing but the range of x and y is only [0,1], and therefore, it seems like an

Hi Yin, I second David's words. I use shared libs myself on debug builds, but static builds with gold on a local disk is pretty feasible. Before I used gold, I had to have 16GB of RAM on my laptop, now I need less than 8GB for static builds. On 28 January 2016 at 23:58, Yin Ma via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It is O.K. I just hope BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON is tested

Hi John, It seems the dereferencing a NULL pointer is undefined behavior but Calling a function through a null pointer seems o.k. If so , for this place, we need comment out the check. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#232 look at Notes from the October 2003 meeting. Yin From: John Criswell [mailto:criswell at illinois.edu] Sent: Wednesday,

Hi Duncan, To use select, usually, there is a compare before select. Presence of comparison will disable some opportunities to optimize some code. Select and Compare is not associative neither. Thanks, Yin -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Duncan Sands Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Hi, For a small case, that calls NULL pointer function. LLVM explicitly converts It to a store because it thinks it is not reachable like calling undefvalue. In InstCombineCalls.cpp:930 I think it is not a right approach because calling null pointer function Will segfault the program. Converting to a store will make program pass Silently. This changes the behavior of a program.

Hi Duncan, Yes, exactly. However, we need define Opcode MIN/MAX Into ISDOpcodes.h. Do you like to add those two definitions Into the tree? Thanks, Yin -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Sands [mailto:duncan.sands at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Duncan Sands Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 12:10 PM To: Yin Ma Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Any plan to

// Please reply this email to jai-Oc46A42Di8jtC6uA/Zb986xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org // Hi, My name is Jai, I am a Technical Recruiter with International Business Solutions. Ltd, NJ. My client in NJ is looking for a JD Edwards Technical Consultant. I have included a description of the project below. Please take a few moments to review, and let me know if this is something you might be interested

Hi Yin, From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Yin Liu via llvm-dev > Hello, > > As is known to all, there is a relationship between program's instructions and its execution time. In other words, we can estimate the execution time based on the number of program > instructions. > > I'm curious about what the relationship between IR

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Yin Ma <yinma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > > > It seems the dereferencing a NULL pointer is undefined behavior but > > Calling a function through a null pointer seems o.k. > What is the well defined behavior of calling a null function pointer? > > > If so , for this place, we need comment out the check. >

Hi Yin, > To use select, usually, there is a compare before select. > Presence of comparison will disable some opportunities to > optimize some code. Select and Compare is not associative > neither. at the IR level LLVM already has pattern matching helpers for identifying min/max idioms, here is part of a transform using this, from InstructionSimplify.cpp: // Signed variants

Hi Matt, Thanks you so much for the reply! I've tried the llvm-mca, it is helpful. I was wondering whether the llvm-mca support the assembly code for the ARM? I cross-compile the test file for ARM like that: clang test.c -O2 -target arm-linux-gnueabihf -static -S -o test.s If I want to check the performance using llvm-mca, is there any option of "-mcpu" for ARM ? Thanks, Yin

I tried to use ''rake db_schema_dump'' from old MySQL database and then use ''rake db_schema_import'' to rebuild the database in PostgreSQL. The issue here is that only some of tables can be imported successfully. For example, in the dumped schema.rb: create_table "profiles", :force => true do |t| t.column "ticker", :string, :limit

Hi Yin, MCA does support the –mcpu and –mtriple options. We have one arm test in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/ARM for a cortex-9, which is an Out of Order chip. Hope that helps! -Matt From: Yin Liu <yinliu.tiger at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 2:49 PM To: Davis, Matthew <Matthew.Davis at sony.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Is there any relationship

On 11/6/13 6:36 PM, Yin Ma wrote: > > Hi, > > For a small case, that calls NULL pointer function. LLVM explicitly > converts > > It to a store because it thinks it is not reachable like calling > undefvalue. > > In InstCombineCalls.cpp:930 > > I think it is not a right approach because calling null pointer function > > Will segfault the program.

Currently, RTP IP have to be the same as SIP IP. But, SIP RFC allows RTP to use different IP as SIP ip. Is there any way to configure it? GUI or CLI? or , will we support it in future? Thanks. -- Rgds, -- Rgds, Hans Yin Web: homeofhans.homeip.net Email: hansyin at gmail.com MSN: hansyin at hotmail.com Skype: hans_yin_vancouver

Hi Andy, Actually, if we just add hooks that preserves the existing behavior, It is not difficult. For example, For case one, we can define one function like virtual const SCEV* getTargetPreferredWinnerReg(const SCEV*& ScaledReg, SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4>& BaseRegs, GlobalValue*& BaseGV) const; In NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs, we can

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yin Ma" <yinma at codeaurora.org> > To: "Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:21:50 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Suggestion About Adding Target Dependent Decision in LSR Please > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > Actually,

Hi dear all, In my laptop(ubuntu 11.10 64bit), I maintained a released R (2.14) and a developmental R, I can specify qplot(..., alpha = ) in R 2.14 , but when I try to use transparency in developmental R, I got a warning message and the plot is clearly not I want. minimal example: > qplot(data = mtcars, x = mpg, y = cyl, alpha = cyl) Warning message: In grid.Call.graphics(L_points, x$x, x$y,