similar to: RFC: multicast add/remove for network frontend

I''d like reviewers for: 6734731 vif-vnic instances can race against each other 6734123 xpvd-event logging is dismal The webrev is at http://dme.org/solaris/webrev/xvm-script-cleanup.

In testing our implementation of the hypervisor copy based backend- >frontend networking changes, we see what I believe are spurious warning messages during the shutdown of the frontend domain: (XEN) /export/build/schuster/xvm-gate/xen.hg/xen/include/asm/mm.h: 189:d0 Error pfn 30e290: rd=ffff830000fcf100, od=ffff830000fcf100, caf=00000000, taf=0000000000000000 (XEN) Xen call trace:

How do I create a vnic that represents the factory assigned MAC address of my physical nic? The bge device in my system (x2100) appears to support 4 MAC addresses. The driver reserves the first as the ''primary/default'' address and allows manipulation of the other three via the MAC_CAPAB_MULTIADDRESS interface. I''d like to use vnics on this system, as I have Xen guest

Hi, I am trying to set up a uPnP server on a Linux box (Debian Sarge Stable kernel 2.6.8). uPnP works using multicast packages for locating servers. This does however seem to fail unless I set the relevant NIC in promiscuous mode. If I do so, it works well. I have added ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 dev eth0 and echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and the kernel is set up to enable

I''d like to enhance Solaris network configuration slightly to allow guest domain IPv4 details to be passed from the domain building control tools through to the relevant components in Solaris (svc:/network/physical and uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs_dlinet.c). Attached is a proposal, roughly in the form of a fasttrack. Diffs for a prototype are at:

# HG changeset patch # User dme@aw # Date 1234261891 0 # Node ID 1efbb12b68601ff4ed928fbb2b27123643136747 # Parent 72cac93428513c23f3a433d2a16dab010881bb07 PCIQuirk`__devIsUnconstrained refers to an undeclared variable if /etc/xen/xend-pci-permissive.sxp doesn''t exist. Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <dme@sun.com> diff -r 72cac9342851 -r 1efbb12b6860

tags 660882 +upstream severity 660882 wishlist retitle 660882 pv network device does not support multicast thanks Hi Simon, I'm afraid the Xen PV drivers (on Linux at least) do not support multicast. There has historically been some support for multicast, IIRC the old Solaris front and backends did support it so there is some support defined but not implemented. e.g. see

Hi, Whilst doing some QA work on XORP on my desktop, which has fxp0 and msk0, fxp0 got totally hosed. I was running PIM-SM and IGMPv2 router-mode on the box at the time. I wonder if this is related to the problems with fxp multicast transmission I saw back in April. I'm a bit concerned about this as fxp is still a very widespread and useful network chip. I am running

Guys, OK, now that we have the new core contributors squared away, we can go back to finishing the contributors list. There were some people who got added and then there is existing contributors list. I think Darren''s suggestion to wait to add new core contributors is fine (let the new constitution settle down and we can in the meanwhile have a more inclusive look at both rather than

Hi, I would like to ask concerning problems after installing xen 3.3 on Centos 5.2 I use 2.6.18.8-xen (xen3.3.1 testing - installing with mercurial). After done with make world and make install, I did mkinitrd and placing it in /boot changing the grub and reboot.. succeded I do not install libvirt and the domUs from the previous xen 3.0 (built-in Centos 5.2) are NOT able to start : [root@wing

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

Hi Everyone, Can anyone confirm if a xen based domU can be used for snort setup? It is not for commercial use, rather just SOHO use. Regards, dot.yet _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi Everyone, Can anyone confirm if a xen based domU can be used for snort setup? It is not for commercial use, rather just SOHO use. Regards, dot.yet _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Objet : Xend start and after lose network Hi everybody : My configuration : Dapper 6.06 LTS with all updates Xen 3.0.2.2 My problem : After making ''xend start'', I lose network connections between my server and local network or internet. Nota : domU cas normally access to network I read about a similar problem in the bugtracker (N. 62) but it seems that this is normally

On Friday, 2017-12-29 at 22:23:01 UTC, Olly Betts wrote: >> After the failure the database appears to be okay: >> >> > agrajag-testing ~/s/notmuch % xapian-check ~/Maildir/.notmuch/xapian >> > ... >> > position table structure checked OK > > This seems to be for an almost empty database (2 items in the postlist > table and nothing anywhere else)

Hi, all I want to get some information of How xVM is integrated with Crossbow project. Do some buddies have those documents or blogs? Thanks --luke

Two hosts, A and B. igb0 on A connects to e1000g1 on B. host A # dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE BRIDGE OVER igb0 phys 1500 unknown -- -- e1000g0 phys 1500 up -- -- e1000g1 phys 1500 up -- -- igb1 phys 1500 up -- -- e1000g1vnic1 vnic 1500 up -- e1000g1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am running Centos 4.3 with the 2.6.9-42.EL.jwltest.156 kernel (to get the skge module) The card is recognized, and I can see traffic when I utlilize wireshark in promiscuous mode including attempts at responding to ARP requests. 9.608260 DellPcba_b8:d7:63 -> Broadcast ARP Who has 172.20.15.25? Tell 172.20.15.27 9.608281 D-Link_87:55:06

Hi, I hope someone can help me, I cannot seem to get a system's ethernet interface to correctly work in promiscuous mode... I have a Centos 6.4 system with 2 bnx2 interfaces on it. I have set up eth1 in promiscuous mode and am sending traffic to it using the port mirroring configuration on a Nortel 3510-24T switch. The switch reports that it is sending a fair amount of traffic to the

Hello, My computer is not connecting to the local network with the following configuration: dmesg.boot contains the following lines: ----------------------------------------- vr0: <VIA VT3043 Rhine I 10/100BaseTX> port 0xec00-0xec7f mem 0xfeafbc00-0xfeafbc7f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 vr0: Ethernet address: 00:40:05:a5:00:04 miibus0: <MII bus> on vr0 amphy0: <Am79C873 10/100