Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "PATCH: xencomm - kernel side"
2006 Aug 21
7
RFC: xencomm in common
Hi,
xencomm is the ppc infrastructure to do hypercalls with guest physical
addresses instead of virtual address.
Because ia64 should also use physicall address, I think it''s better to re-use
the ppc code and to put into common code.
I''d propose to submit this patch is every part is OK (ie no NAK).
This patch creates include/xen/xencomm_access.h which is to be included by
2006 Aug 17
5
Re: [XenPPC] Xencomm for xen/ia64
(CCed to xen-devel for completeness. ;)
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 17:24 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> I am porting xen-ppc''s xencomm to xen/ia64.
> Currently on xen/ia64 copy_from/to_guest uses guest virtual address. This
> works well as long as the virtual addresses are in the TLB. When not in TLB
> (or vTLB) the hypercall can''t success without domain help. The
2006 Apr 21
4
[Xen-ia64-devel] flush_tlb_mask and grant_table on ia64
Hi,
on IA64 flushing the whole TLB is very expensive: this is a cpu tlb flush and
clearing 16MB of memory (virtual tlb).
However, flushing an address range is rather cheap. Flushing an address range
on every processors is also cheap (no IPI).
Unfortunatly Xen common code flushes the whole TLB after unmapping grant
reference.
Currently, this is not done on IA64 because domain_dirty_cpumask
2006 Aug 11
2
PATCH: pretty print for xenperf
Hi,
this is almost an ia64 specific patch to xenperf.
It makes xenperf output more understandable.
On x86, it now displays hypercalls name.
Tested on xen/ia64.
Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2005 Mar 23
9
[patch] final header fixes
I think this is the last of the header fixes I''ve run across. Though it''s
sometimes difficult to tell, I believe Xen/ia64 has asm/mm.h, flushtlb.h,
page.h, and shadow.h. Please apply.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
2006 Mar 30
3
[patch] bitops on irq_cpustat_t->__softirq_pending
As mentioned earlier, PowerPC''s atomic ops operate on longs, and we have made
our *_bit() prototypes use long* (instead of void*) to warn us of problems at
compile time. Here''s one caller that was flagged:
test_and_set_bit(nr, &softirq_pending(cpu))
Accordingly, we need __softirq_pending to be long, not int.
PowerPC is currently using a few files unmodified from the x86
2006 Aug 08
11
architecture-specific stuff in xend
Hi Ewan, I''m almost ready to integrate some PPC-specific stuff into
xend, and I was wondering if you had a plan for how that should work.
First example: the device tree data structure we talked about a few
weeks ago. We will need to pass the config data to PPC code, probably in
XendDomainInfo.initDomain(), and then pass the resulting data structure
into libxc''s xc_linux_load()
2006 Apr 14
8
[rfc] [patch] 32/64-bit hypercall interface revisited
Last year we had a discussion[1] about how the hypercall ABI
unfortunately contains fields that change width between 32- and 64-bit
builds. This is a huge problem as we come up on the python management
stack for ppc64, since the distributions ship 32-bit python. A 32-bit
python/libxc cannot currently manage a 64-bit hypervisor.
I had a patch but was unable to test it, and some other things were
2007 Jun 23
2
PATCH: add xc_domain_setdebugging in xenctrl API
Hi,
for ia64, I''d like to add xc_domain_setdebugging() in the xenctrl API.
This patch implements it and modifies xc_ptrace.c to use it.
The rationnal is enabling debugging tool not based on the ptrace API.
The ptrace API is based on Linux ptrace which (at least on ia64) doesn''t
have many privilegied registers.
I''d prefer this patch being integrated on
2008 Jun 19
0
[PATCH] ia64/xen: implement the arch specific part of xencomm.
On ia64/xen, pointer argument for the hypercall is passed
by pseudo physical address (guest physical address.)
So it is necessary to convert virtual address into pseudo physical
address right before issuing hypercall. The frame work is called
xencomm. This patch implements arch specific part.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata
2008 Jun 19
0
[PATCH] ia64/xen: implement the arch specific part of xencomm.
On ia64/xen, pointer argument for the hypercall is passed
by pseudo physical address (guest physical address.)
So it is necessary to convert virtual address into pseudo physical
address right before issuing hypercall. The frame work is called
xencomm. This patch implements arch specific part.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata
2008 Jul 17
31
[PATCH 00/29] ia64/xen domU take 9
This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 9 which is rebased
to 2.6.26
This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops
frame work which was sent as another patchest.
This patchset does the followings.
- Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define
related structures.
- Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to
communicate with Xen
2008 Jul 17
31
[PATCH 00/29] ia64/xen domU take 9
This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 9 which is rebased
to 2.6.26
This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops
frame work which was sent as another patchest.
This patchset does the followings.
- Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define
related structures.
- Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to
communicate with Xen
2006 Apr 21
1
RE: [PATCH]Check the values of MAX_VIRT_CPUS and NR_CPUSfor SMP
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@bull.net]
>Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:26
>> >
>> >See how we solve this on x86 near the top of do_boot_cpu() in
>> >arch/x86/smpboot.c. Essentially we allocate extra idle domains on
>> >demand to give us enough idle vcpus for one per physical cpu.
>> >
>> > -- Keir
>>
>> Yes,
2006 Jun 09
2
evtchn_upcall_mask
This topic came up months ago (under the thread "make
hypercall_preempt_check() a little more sensitive"), but since then, due
to a misunderstanding, PPC has been running with a hack instead of a
solution. So anyways, I''ve been digging into this again.
PowerPC domains are allowed to write to the "interrupts enabled" bit
(called External Exceptions, or EE) in the
2006 Sep 20
15
[PATCH] [XEND] Remove hard tabs
# HG changeset patch
# User Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
# Date 1158780052 18000
# Node ID f7d90f962967a5a94fce0c04f8fcac449f36344f
# Parent 041be3f6b38e05f904d240630c18cadb1259317b
[XEND] Remove hard tabs.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
diff -r 041be3f6b38e -r f7d90f962967 tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py
---
2006 Jan 26
2
do_* declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] added multicall)
Hi,
on ia64, the do_* functions for hypercalls are called in C. However, they are
not declared in any .h file. I think it is cleaner to declare them in an
header file rather than locally. The question is in which header file.
Thank you for any suggestion.
The do_* functions are at least:
extern long do_ni_hypercall(void);
extern long do_dom0_op(dom0_op_t *u_dom0_op);
extern long
2008 May 19
20
[PATCH 00/23] ia64/xen domU take 6
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on
ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest.
Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3,
bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support.
I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository.
This patchset does the followings.
- Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to
2008 May 19
20
[PATCH 00/23] ia64/xen domU take 6
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on
ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest.
Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3,
bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support.
I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository.
This patchset does the followings.
- Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to
2006 Aug 30
3
arch-specific xc.c code?
Hi Ewan/Alistair, I have a patch that looks like this:
diff -r a39ad4c78850 tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
--- a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h Wed Aug 30 13:51:12 2006 +0100
+++ b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h Wed Aug 30 15:11:20 2006 -0500
@@ -416,6 +416,10 @@ int xc_domain_memory_populate_physmap(in
unsigned int address_bits,
xen_pfn_t