Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] XM on XenAPI: Enable ''xm pci-attach/detach'' via XenAPI"
2008 May 07
0
[PATCH] XM/XenAPI: Enable console other_config to be passed through Xen API
Currently console class''s "other_config" parameters (such as "vnclisten"
and "vncpasswd")
are not passed to xend when creating a domain by xm command through xen-api.
The attached patch fixes this problem.
Regards,
-----------------------
Yosuke Iwamatsu
NEC Corporation
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
2008 Jul 02
0
[PATCH][2/3] XenAPI: Add Direct PCI Assignment (DPCI) Support
Add direct pci device assignment support.
This patch depends on the previous patch (1/3).
-----------------------------------------
Fields for DPCI class:
(RO_inst) VM
PPCI
hotplug_slot <- same as vslot param of pci-attach/detach.
(RO_run) virtual_domain
virtual_bus
virtual_slot
virtual_func
virtual_name <- domain:bus:slot:func
2009 Jan 06
0
[PATCH] xend: Fix error handling in device_create()
This is a small fix of the error handling in device_create().
Signed-off-by: Yosuke Iwamatsu <y-iwamatsu@ab.jp.nec.com>
Regards,
-----------------------
Yosuke Iwamatsu
NEC Corporation
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2008 Jul 16
0
[PATCH] pcifront/pciback: Fix Handling of Device Disconnect
When destroying pcifront/pciback, the following message appears in
the guest linux kernel log.
WARNING: g.e. still in use!
WARNING: leaking g.e. and page still in use!
This is caused by the wrong disconnect procedure that pcifront
terminates the gnttab foreign access before pciback unmaps the ring.
This patch corrects the handling of pcifront/pciback destruction
sequence. Firstly pcifront
2007 Dec 17
0
[PATCH] Xend: Fix PCI Device Configuration
Xend doesn''t correctly work after restart, when there is a domU which owns
a pci device (driver domain). This patch fixes the problem.
Regards,
-------------------
Yosuke Iwamatsu
NEC Corporation
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2008 Feb 21
0
[PATCH] pciback: Fix Destroying pcifront/pciback
Hi,
It seems that destroying pcifront/pciback always fails on current xen.
This patch fixes the problem, making pciback switch to "Closed" state
after pcifront switched to "Closing" state.
Regards,
-------------------
Yosuke Iwamatsu
NEC Corporation
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2009 Apr 09
0
[PATCH] Fix xm pci-attach/detach for inactive managed domains
Hi,
I found the following problems. xm pci-attach command and xm pci-detach
command fail on inactive managed domains. An attaching patch solves the
problems.
# xm list
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 1024 2 r----- 51.5
vm1 512 2
2008 May 15
7
PCI Passthrough using GART on AMD CPUs?
Hey everyone,
I realize that people asking about PCI passthrough has been thoroughly beaten to
death many a time, however I couldn''t find the answer to these questions
anywhere (and I''d really like to know :P) so please just bare with me.
I know the GART built into AMD chipsets can act as a "mini IOMMU" and do DMA
translation but not protection/isolation. However,
2007 May 16
0
attach/detach asymmetry
Is there a good reason why arguments to 'attach' and 'detach' differ so
much? Yes, I know this is the documented behaviour, it just seems to
violate the principle of least surprise.
Examples:
file = "foo.RData"
df = data.frame(x=1:10,y=1:10)
attach(file) # attaches the RData file 'foo.RData'
attach(df) # attaches the object df
Not surprising in an
1997 Aug 12
0
R-alpha: attach( <data.frame> , pos = 1) -- does not work. detach(., save=..)
[R-0.50-a3]
It seems intuitive that
attach( .., pos = 1)
is harder
than other attach()es.
But still...
If it ever will work, it is even more important to have
detach( .... , save = "VAR.name")
~~~~~~~ --------
to be working.
The documentation says that detach(.) returns invisibly.
Therefore, we don't NEED the above 'save = ' argument to detach,
since we can
2014 Mar 27
0
Attach / detach problem for passthrough/SR-IOV in libvirt
Hi all
I just encountered a problem in libvirt while was trying to attach and
detach a sr-iov vf to my VM
The version of my libvirt is 1.1.1-0ubuntu8.5
I tried to attach the device using following xml
<interface type='hostdev' managed='yes'>
<mac address='5c:01:fd:12:34:58'/>
<source>
<address type='pci'
2007 Nov 25
4
behaviour of ''xm block-attach'' changed with 3.1.2?
''xm block-attach'' doesn''t let me assign the same backend device anymore,
even if I use ''r!'' or ''w!''.
I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0).
Is this the way it is supposed to work?
Thanks
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2018 Dec 19
0
[PATCH 04/10] drm/virtio: move virtio_gpu_object_{attach, detach} calls.
Drop the dummy ttm backend implementation, add a real one for
TTM_PL_FLAG_TT objects. The bin/unbind callbacks will call
virtio_gpu_object_{attach,detach}, to update the object state
on the host side, instead of invoking those calls from the
move_notify() callback.
With that in place the move and move_notify callbacks are not
needed any more, so drop them.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
2019 Mar 18
0
[PATCH v3 1/5] drm/virtio: move virtio_gpu_object_{attach, detach} calls.
Drop the dummy ttm backend implementation, add a real one for
TTM_PL_FLAG_TT objects. The bin/unbind callbacks will call
virtio_gpu_object_{attach,detach}, to update the object state
on the host side, instead of invoking those calls from the
move_notify() callback.
With that in place the move and move_notify callbacks are not
needed any more, so drop them.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
2012 Nov 15
1
virtio_blk BUG on detach-disk/attach-disk of mounted vd
Hi,
I know this isn't a valid use case or generally sane thing to do, but we
have a bug (link, with details, below) filed for a panic against a
detach-disk/attach-disk sequence of an ext4 mounted vd device on a rhel
kernel.
The same sequence leads to the following BUG on an upstream kernel
(3.7.0-rc5+ SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux):
[ 75.114951] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
2012 Nov 15
1
virtio_blk BUG on detach-disk/attach-disk of mounted vd
Hi,
I know this isn't a valid use case or generally sane thing to do, but we
have a bug (link, with details, below) filed for a panic against a
detach-disk/attach-disk sequence of an ext4 mounted vd device on a rhel
kernel.
The same sequence leads to the following BUG on an upstream kernel
(3.7.0-rc5+ SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux):
[ 75.114951] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
2006 May 13
0
trouble with Dir.chdir
Hi, folks
I wroted the codes below.
I have the trouble with the line start from "Dir.chdir".
When I run this code, the FTP of photos is successfuly done.
But, the display of browser is white out.
When I comment out the line start from "Dir.chdir",
the trouble doesn''t happen.
Is there anything wrong with my usage of "Dir.chdir"?
def ftp_photo
2006 Jul 07
3
attach and detach question
I have a large R program that I am constantly running over and over again. At the beginning of this program, I create a hige matrix and a huge dataframe but these are constant. What I mean by constant is that, if I run the program over later, I really should just use the old matrix and dataframe ( if they exist ) that were created in a previous run so that the program doesn't have to spend
2011 Dec 28
1
Moving XenAPI python modules in a separate binary
Hi Mike and Jon,
If I do this:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/XenAPI.py
then I can see that the XenAPI python package is in fact xcp-xapi. This
is quite annoying, because I will need it when building OpenStack nova,
but xcp-xapi depends on the Xen hypervisor, which I don't care about
when building Openstack. Said in another way: I'd like to avoid having
to put
2010 Aug 31
1
xenapi vm.create question
I trying to right a module that will control xen function from perl but i''m
having a issue trying to understand what need to be send to the function (VM
ref) create (session_id s, VM record args) from xenapi.pdf. Can someone
please give me a snippet of what i should be passing to the function. I
search Google but nothing came with that helped.
--
View this message in context: