Thomas Goirand
2011-Dec-28 10:16 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Moving XenAPI python modules in a separate binary
Hi Mike and Jon, If I do this: dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/XenAPI.py then I can see that the XenAPI python package is in fact xcp-xapi. This is quite annoying, because I will need it when building OpenStack nova, but xcp-xapi depends on the Xen hypervisor, which I don't care about when building Openstack. Said in another way: I'd like to avoid having to put "xcp-xapi" as Build-Depends: for nova. So I was wondering, would it be possible to have all python stuff packaged in a separate binary, like python-xen-api or something like that like python-xapi, python-xcp? (which one has your preference?) Thomas
Mike McClurg
2011-Dec-29 22:14 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Moving XenAPI python modules in a separate binary
On 12/28/11, Thomas Goirand <thomas at goirand.fr> wrote:> Hi Mike and Jon, > > If I do this: > dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/XenAPI.py > > then I can see that the XenAPI python package is in fact xcp-xapi. This > is quite annoying, because I will need it when building OpenStack nova, > but xcp-xapi depends on the Xen hypervisor, which I don't care about > when building Openstack. Said in another way: I'd like to avoid having > to put "xcp-xapi" as Build-Depends: for nova. > > So I was wondering, would it be possible to have all python stuff > packaged in a separate binary, like python-xen-api or something like > that like python-xapi, python-xcp? (which one has your preference?) >I like the sound of 'python-xenapi', since that's what the module is called. 'python-xapi' would also be acceptable to me. Any other opinions? Mike
Reasonably Related Threads
- Building XCP Debian packages: what sources or repo to use?
- Bug#710650: Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
- Bug#710650: Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
- Bug#710650: Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
- Bug#677395: xcp-xapi: xe pif-configure-ip does not remove old ip from interface