Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "OpenBSD again"
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 04/11/15 11:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
> to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about porting it
> at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
From what they said, they never really cared about nvidia because
nvidia provides a binary driver that works, unlike intel
2006 Oct 01
4
HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
On October 31st, FreeBSD 5.3 and FreeBSD 5.4 will have reached their
End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security
Team. Users of either of those FreeBSD releases are strongly encouraged
to upgrade to FreeBSD 5.5 or FreeBSD 6.1 before that date.
In addition, the FreeBSD 6.0 End of Life is presently scheduled
2003 Jul 16
3
Announcing DragonFly BSD!
Announcing DragonFly BSD!
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Hello everyone! For the last few months I have been investigating
and then working on a new approach to the BSD kernel. This has snowballed
into a far more ambitious project which is now ready for wider
participation.
It is the intent of this project to take over development of the 4.x tree,
to move kernel
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 04/11/15 10:38, C Bergström wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote:
>> On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone actually and or actively working on this?
>> Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base.
>> Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will
2005 Mar 04
4
Fwd: FreeBSD hiding security stuff
FYI
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>Subject: FreeBSD hiding security stuff
>Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:51:42 -0700
>From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
>
>A few FreeBSD developers apparently have found some security issue
>of some sort affecting i386 operating systems in some cases.
>
>They have refused to give us real details.
>
>A promise is now being
2011 Aug 16
1
dovecot 2.0.13 fd_send(imap, 15) failed, dovecot 1.2.16 fd_send(10) failed
Hi, I am reinstalling my server and i have encoutered a strange problem,
both dovecot 2.0.13 and 1.2.16 are
reporting me a problem with fd_send Invalid argument on imap login. I am
running dragonfly bsd 2.10.1., compiled
dovecot from pkgsrc.
Can someone help me out or at least point me in some direction, i am a bit
lost... :(
Aug 15 10:01:00 master: Info: Dovecot v2.0.13 starting up
Aug 15
2006 Apr 17
3
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
Hi again,
I wrote:
> > I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make
> > unknown = OpenBSD and Unix
>
> Have you looked at ./config.log. ./configure creates this as it runs
> as a trace of the path it took through ./configure. Work backwards
> from the end to find out what it didn't like.
I remember SourceForge's compile farm has an OpenBSD x86
2006 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
I just added __OpenBSD__ everywhere __FreeBSD__ was being tested (there
were about a dozen places). I suspect we'll have to add one for NetBSD
also one day (even DragonflyBSD?). INT8_MAX and friends ought to be
declared by <stdint.h>. It is on FreeBSD.
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>I wrote:
>
>
>>>I would like to test but the I modigied the
2009 Jan 12
2
bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi
Hello,
I am attempting to get by broadcom wifi card up and running, am sick of
trying to get ndis working, and am attempting to use the bwi driver
(originating in dragonflyBSD). I'm hoping others here have tried to do the
same and have some pointers. I'm using 7.1-RELEASE (system/source are
in-sync) and my card is a BCM94306MP. My dmesg is posted below.
Bwi(4) is installed and it
2011 Sep 15
2
Dragonfly and Zip uploads
I''m poring through the Dragonfly source code right now, trying to get a handle on how to apply the following technique there:
Client uploads a Zip archive containing N images, PDF files, text files, etc. When that file arrives at the server, but before it is stored as an attachment to the current object, the Zip is burst open, contents are iterated over, and each contained file is saved
2006 Apr 18
1
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
I'll Check it out.. is it in the CVS or the release yet.. or how do I apply a patch to it... thanks much for the update.. I'll feel better about the whole thing..OpenBSD is really nice with the pro-police stack and would like to see an alternative to the GCC only compiler chain of tools especially as it is based on a somewhat archaic optiminzation backend and procedural stuff is pretty
2014 Sep 25
7
Does dovecot work OK on *BSD?
Hi all,
I have a dovecot server on my Debian Wheezy desktop computer. My days
with Debian are limited, and I'm investigating several 'BSD's:
OpenBSD
FreeBSD
PCBSD
NetBSD
DragonflyBSD
etc
Is there any reason Dovecot wouldn't work on any of those? Does anyone
know if those OS's have packages for Dovecot, or do I need to compile
it myself?
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
2016 Oct 13
5
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> As always it's best to first upgrade to the current version (3.1.3)
> if at all possible, as there's always the chance that the cause of
> your problems has already been fixed.
Good call, but I believe I may have ruled this out. I didn't upgrade to
3.1.3, but both sides are running 3.1.1 protocol version 31 now. Same
2007 Apr 26
4
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:03.ipv6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-07:03.ipv6 Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: IPv6 Routing Header 0 is dangerous
Category: core
Module: ipv6
Announced:
2005 Dec 31
2
Resend: setting breakpoints around hypercalls in a domU causes dom0 to lockup
Any thoughts on setting breakpoints around hypercalls?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 26, 2005 12:14 AM
Subject: setting breakpoints around hypercalls in a domU causes dom0 to
lockup
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser <
Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Stepping through hypercalls (at the source level, not
2005 May 21
5
copying large files over NFS locks up machine on -testing from Thursday
I''ve locked up my dom0 a couple of times this morning copying a 3GB
file from local disk to an NFS mount(neither xend nor guests running).
I don''t encounter this problem on the stock CentOS 4 kernel. The
machine is a PowerEdge 2850 with 2 e1000 cards - the one in use is
connected to a PowerConnect 2216 10/100 switch and has negotiated
100Mbit. I''ll check if the stock
2012 Oct 12
0
new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> wrote:
> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config,
> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they
> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and
Dragonfly BSD. I wonder
2004 Jul 16
1
/proc/xen/memory_target patch
This patch to the balloon driver eliminates the need for a user-space
program to slosh memory between domains and xen. This uses a proc
file at /proc/xen/memory_target. When read it reports memory the domain
owns in bytes. Writing a new value to the memory_target proc file
will cause the domain to exchange memory with xen to reach the target.
A xenolinux domain cannot grow bigger than it was
2016 Oct 16
1
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 20:08 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> I don't remember whether or not you said you were running rsync over
> ssh but if you are you can also debug the ssh layer. You can even do
> it at both ends....
>
> On the server run a debugging sshd on an alternate port with:
> /usr/sbin/sshd -dDp222
> (note that this will only accept 1 connection, debug to the
2005 Sep 06
4
Which Linux distribution?
We have tried Asterisk 1.0.9 on FC4 and have never
been able to get CAPI (with Fritz card, fcpci) to work
properly. Apart from that Asterisk works fine in
switching internal calls. But it's useless if we can't
make outgoing calls on our ISDN line.
We are considering abandoning FC4 for Debian or SuSe.
What is the general concensus on the best Linux to run
Asterisk with CAPI?
/Why Tea