similar to: VMX status report 9514:4ad317429111

We have tested latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset.Here is the test summary. issues: - No bocking issues. IA-32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain Can bootup VMX & XenU with different memory size(VMX:128MB,256MB,512MB.XenU:256MB)

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain + Can bootup

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: ========================= 1). VBD could not work well Partial support is added in c/s 13198, but the loader still complains that symbol "irq_to_evtchn_port" is missing. 2). IA32E: IA32E vista can''t boot up normally, it gives a blue screen. Then the qemu window

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Four VMX at same time on IA32 host - Cannot boot Windows XP SP1/SP2 on IA32e host - Create IA32-PAE VMX on IA32e host will make VMX kernel panic - Create IA32 VMX on IA32e host will make VMX hang - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: -

We have test latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915 chipset and Here is the test summary: IA32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can startup unmodified 2.4/2.6 linux on VMX domain Can startup VMX & Xen with different configuration Part of LTP runs well in VMX domain(2.6) IA32E: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can startup unmodified 2.6 linux on

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Bug has been fixed: ========================== 1).VMX domains fail to reboot bug has been fixed. Issues: ========================== 1) VBD driver does not work well http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 2) Only one vCPU is found in SMP xenU guest OS

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Three platforms (32/PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue ================================================ No new issue Issues List: ================================================ 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

Hi all, This is today''s xen nightly test report, changeset: 16481 unstable tree.  Linux-xen:323 No new issue today. But I include full validation failure in this list.    Old issues : ================================================= 1) Can not install 32bit Fedora 7 with vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 2) [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest

We saw these issues in recent ChangeSet: 1. Reboot fail in Guest OS: Reboot in guest will close current qemu windows but does not create a new qemu window to restart 32bit HV/xen0: 2. 4 LTP math cases(float_bessel, float_exp_log, float_power and float_trigo) sometime fail. (775) 3. Kernel build in VMX may meet kernel panic. It complains like: "<0> Kernel panic - not syncing:

Hi All, There are two new issues found in Xen 3.2 RC2 compared with last time nightly testing. Save/Restore failed and local live migration failed. There is also another installation issue found in regular testing: HVM domain would be blue scree when install 32bit up acpi winXP on 32e host It is reported in HVM domain, if using SCSI emulation (disk = [

I am seeing a kernel message, "hdc: lost interrupt", when running LTP on the xen0 domain. The first time I saw the ''kernel: hdc: lost interrupt'' in /var/log/messages, I was running LTP on both xen0 and xenU domains. The xenU domain was totally hung at this point. Suspecting a setup error, I re-checked the installation and reran LTP on xen0 alone, without having

Hi,All We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Two platforms (PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue (1) ================================================ 1) Fails to restore VMX guests http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=929 Issues List (3):

With this patch, x86 and x86-64 share ioport.c, fixing LTP iopl and ioperm testcase failures (on both). We found an iopl testcase failing even on x86 xenlinux. Now x86-64 xenlinux should have the same results regarding the LTP testcases (as far as we tested). Signed-off-by: Li B Xin <li.b.xin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com> Jun --- Intel Open Source

After fix bug 130 and 131, and some LTP bugs. ocfs2 can now pass all LTP filesystem related system call testcases. detail result see attach. ------------------- Intel China Software Lab. iNet: 8-752-1243 8621-52574545-1243(O) xfling@users.sourceforge.net Opinions are my own and don't represent those of my employer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Fixed issue ================================================= 1) save&restore hvm guest will cause dom0 crash http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=962 2) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 3) Build HVM PV driver failed

Summary: Changeset 10173 - 64bit UP and SMP guests boot cleanly - 32bit UP guests boot clean and 32bit SMP guests still fail to boot (see failure.7) - 32bit UP guests lockup under load with "ata1: command 0x25 timeout" (see failure.4) - 64bit SMP 2 CPU guests lockup under load with "ata1: command 0x25 timeout" (see failure.2) - 32bit UP guest crashed on user load test