similar to: Sanitising a Phone Number input

On 08/02/2023 12:48, Luke Barone via samba wrote: > hide unreadable = yes > > I was under the impression this was a very time consuming option in > domains. > > Just making myself an opticians appointment, how did I miss that ? Probably fixated on the bad sanitisation. Rowland

Hi there, I'd like to create a heatmap from my matrix with a) a defined color range (lets say from yellow to red) b) using striking colors above and below a certain threshold (above = "green", below = "blue") Example matrix (there should be a few outliers generated...) + simple levelplot without outliers marked: library(lattice) my.mat <- matrix(rnorm(800), nrow =

Hi everyone, My question will probably seem simple to most of you, but I have spent many hours trying to solve it. I need to perform a series of sequential calculations on my dataframe that move across rows and down columns, and then repeat themselves at each unique 'MM' by 'DD' grouping. Specifically, I want to add 'DEPART' time (24 hr time) to 'TRAVEL'(minutes)

Commit-ID: 61d300672e0c1877482deed0f745b52ef306c7d3 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=61d300672e0c1877482deed0f745b52ef306c7d3 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:35:18 +0800 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:47:34 +0200 [klibc] [VAR] Sanitise environment

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com> wrote: > Hello Joe, > > > > > > I just did a mount like this (added the bold): > > > mount -t glusterfs -o > *attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-timeout=600,fopen-keep-cache* > ,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log >

Hello Joe, ? ? I really appreciate your feedback, but I already tried the opcache stuff (to not valildate at all). It improves of course then, but not completely somehow. Still quite slow. ? I did not try the mount options yet, but I will now! ? ? With nfs (doesnt matter much built-in version 3 or ganesha version 4) I can even host the site perfectly fast without these extreme opcache settings.

Hi all, ? ? One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it, replicated on 3 different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes are app servers at the same time). We could actually almost work locally if we wouldn't need to have the same files on the 3 nodes and redundancy :) ? Initial cluster was created like this: ? gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp

Hello Joe, ? ? I just did a mount like this (added the bold): ? mount -t glusterfs -o attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-timeout=600,fopen-keep-cache,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www ?Results: ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 5000

Hello Vijay, ? ? What do you mean exactly? What info is missing? ? PS: I already found out that for this particular test all the difference is made by :?negative-timeout=600 , when removing it, it's much much slower again. ? ? Regards Jo ? -----Original message----- From:Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 18:16 Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is

Hello, ? ? Here is the volume info as requested by soumya: ? #gluster volume info www ?Volume Name: www Type: Replicate Volume ID: 5d64ee36-828a-41fa-adbf-75718b954aff Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www Brick2: 192.168.140.42:/gluster/www Brick3: 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www Options Reconfigured:

On 07/11/2017 08:14 AM, Jo Goossens wrote: > RE: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs > > Hello Joe, > > I really appreciate your feedback, but I already tried the opcache > stuff (to not valildate at all). It improves of course then, but not > completely somehow. Still quite slow. > > I did not try the mount options yet, but I will now!

Hello, ? ? Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times faster: ? ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top

My standard response to someone needing filesystem performance for www traffic is generally, "you're doing it wrong". https://joejulian.name/blog/optimizing-web-performance-with-glusterfs/ That said, you might also look at these mount options: attribute-timeout, entry-timeout, negative-timeout (set to some large amount of time), and fopen-keep-cache. On 07/11/2017 07:48 AM, Jo

Hi, I have a gluster 3.10 volume with a dir with ~1 million small files in them, say mounted at /mnt/dir with FUSE, and I'm observing something weird: When I list and stat them all using rsync, then the lstat() calls that rsync does are incredibly fast (23 microseconds per call on average, definitely faster than a network roundtrip between my 3-machine bricks connected via Ethernet). But

Hello, I need to create a dataframe containing all possible combinations of three variables: SITE (101,102,103,104), WDAY (MON,TUE,WED,THR,FRI), and TOD (MORN, AFTN). There should be a total of 40 unique combinations in my dataframe. I used expand.grid() successfully(?) to create my dataframe, but then when I went to order it by SITE, the resultant dataframe only contained four rows, one for each

I did a quick test on one of my lab clusters with no tuning except for quota being enabled: [root at dell-per730-03 ~]# gluster v info Volume Name: vmstore Type: Replicate Volume ID: 0d2e4c49-334b-47c9-8e72-86a4c040a7bd Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 192.168.50.1:/rhgs/brick1/vmstore Brick2:

OpenSSH Security Advisory: x11fwd.adv This document may be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/x11fwd.adv 1. Affected configurations All versions of OpenSSH prior to 7.2p2 with X11Forwarding enabled. 2. Vulnerability Missing sanitisation of untrusted input allows an authenticated user who is able to request X11 forwarding to inject commands to xauth(1). Injection of xauth

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5675 bytes Desc: Clear Day Bkgrd.jpg Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20060515/b39aa4d5/attachment.jpeg

A question that someone asked me, cut and pasted from another board: >>I've got 8 cores on my machine and while encoding only one processor is used, and maxed out. Is there any way to distribute the load across multi-cores?<< I have no idea what the answer to this is. The question was about flac on OS X Scott

I'm trying to use plotting character to encode the variable "block" from my dataset in a conditioned lattice graphic (R 1.9.0 on Mac OS 10.3.3). The data I'm using is the dataframe "dryoutcover" which is here (4k): http://anthony.darrouzet-nardi.net/downloads/dryoutcover.Rdata The code that generates my graphic almost correctly is as follows: xyplot(coversage ~