similar to: Compilation failure

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Compilation failure"

2006 Nov 20
1
compilation bug
Hello When i try to make world (any) from xen-3.0.2 to xen-unstable-src I gat following error : gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m64 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix include -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/home/test1/xen-unstable/xen/include
2008 Mar 07
6
where is the location of definition of "do_xen_version"?
hi, my friends: Currently, i am studying the way of hypercall's implementation. i have already known the flow of hypercall's execuation, and i decided to add a new hypercall into the Xen. first, i want to know the detail of one hypercall function, for example, "do_xen_version", but i can not find the location of definition of "do_xen_version". who can help me? i have
2007 Nov 29
1
VMX status report. Xen: #16481 & Dom0: #323
Hi all, This is today''s xen nightly test report, changeset: 16481 unstable tree.  Linux-xen:323 No new issue today. But I include full validation failure in this list.    Old issues : ================================================= 1) Can not install 32bit Fedora 7 with vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 2) [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest
2008 Nov 18
6
[PATCH] fix memory allocation from NUMA node for VT-d.
The memory relating guest domain should be allocated from NUMA node on which the guest runs. Because the latency of the same NUMA node is faster than that of a different one. This patch fixes memory allocation for Address Translation Structure of VT-d. VT-d uses two types of Structures for DMA address translation. The one is Device Assignment Structure. The other is Address Translation
2007 Dec 20
1
VMX status report. Xen:#16646 & Xen0: #370 -- Xen 3.2 RC2 -- two new issues
Hi All, There are two new issues found in Xen 3.2 RC2 compared with last time nightly testing. Save/Restore failed and local live migration failed. There is also another installation issue found in regular testing: HVM domain would be blue scree when install 32bit up acpi winXP on 32e host It is reported in HVM domain, if using SCSI emulation (disk = [
2011 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] [MCJIT] Why does it produce non-PIC ELF code?
ELF that MCJIT writes on x86_64 has relocations in it. Particularly, R_X86_64_PC32 relocations are used for the sections .gcc_except_table and .eh_frame related to exception processing. I am not sure where is general documentation on relocation types, including R_X86_64_PC32. Looks like it's nowhere to be found on the web. But 32-bit relocation can't be used in 64-bit code since it
2012 Jul 30
3
[PATCH] Intel VT-d: Dump IOMMU supported page sizes
diff -r e6266fc76d08 -r 6feac926cf80 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c Fri Jul 27 12:22:13 2012 +0200 +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c Mon Jul 30 15:35:16 2012 -0700 @@ -2137,6 +2137,15 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void) { iommu = drhd->iommu; + printk("Intel VT-d supported page sizes: 4kB"); + if
2014 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Assertion fails resolving R_X86_64_PC32 relocation
I would think that the R_X86_64_PC32 relocation type should never be generated with large code model since large code model, by definition, makes no assumptions about the size or address of sections. The use of win32-elf might throw a wrinkle into this, since that is a code path that probably isn't exercised much outside of MCJIT use. That said, when this assertion fails it is usually
2012 Jul 11
3
[PATCH] vt-d: fix wrong addr in IOTLB invalidation descriptor
According to vt-d specs, the addr in IOTLB invalidation descriptor should be 4K page aligned. Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com> diff -r 0455d8317631 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c Thu Jun 28 18:43:28 2012 +0100 +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c Wed Jul 11 08:43:24 2012 +0800 @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int
2018 Jun 05
2
lld mishandling R_X86_64_PC32 relocations
Hi, I've tracked down what I believe is a bug in lld's relocation processing for R_X86_64_PC32 REL relocations. I'm producing the object file in a slightly unusual way: I'm using objcopy on a relocatable i386 ELF object file to convert it to x86_64 which transforms a R_386_PC32 into a R_X86_64_PC32. Steps to reproduce: 1. Assemble the attached bug.asm using nasm and note the
2020 Nov 02
2
[llvm-mc] FreeBSD kernel module performance impact when upgrading clang
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from clang5 to clang10. Unfortunately clang10 introduced a negative performance impact. The cause is an increase of PLT entries from this patch (first released in clang7): https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36370 https://reviews.llvm.org/D43383 If I revert that clang patch locally, the additional PLT entries and the performance impact disappear. This
2013 Sep 23
3
[LLVMdev] [lld] ELF needs type for SharedLibraryAtom.
The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. #include <stdio.h> int main() { fputs("hi\n", stdout); } The reason is that stdout gets a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation, but is of type Object. The ELF writer can't see this, and assumes all R_X86_64_PC32 relocations in dynamic outputs are to functions
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] [MCJIT] Why does it produce non-PIC ELF code?
On 07/08/2011 01:25 PM, Yuri wrote: > ELF that MCJIT writes on x86_64 has relocations in it. Particularly, > R_X86_64_PC32 relocations are used for the sections .gcc_except_table > and .eh_frame related to exception processing. > I am not sure where is general documentation on relocation types, > including R_X86_64_PC32. Looks like it's nowhere to be found on the web. > But
2012 Oct 24
5
[PATCH v3] IOMMU: keep disabled until iommu_setup() is called
The iommu is enabled by default when xen is booting and later disabled in iommu_setup() when no iommu is present. But under some circumstances iommu code can be called before iommu_setup() is processed. If there is no iommu available xen crashes. This can happen for example when panic(...) is called as introduced with the patch "x86-64: detect processors subject to AMD erratum #121 and
2012 Nov 28
2
[PATCH] VT-d: make scope parsing code type safe
Rather than requiring the scopes to be the first members of their respective structures (so that casts can be used to switch between the different views), properly use types and container_of(). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -304,13 +304,15 @@ static int __init scope_device_count(con
2011 Mar 15
6
[PATCH] ept: Fix bug in changeset 22526:7a5ee3800417
This fixes a bug in changeset 22526:7a5ee3800417, where the wrong value is read when deciding whether to flush the VTd tables. The effect is minor: in situations where the p2m entry is changed but the mfn is the same, the VTd tables will be unnecessarily flushed. old_entry is left untouched in the second case, since having a present old_entry will cause the an unnecessary check to be taken at
2013 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] ELF needs type for SharedLibraryAtom.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. > > #include <stdio.h> > > int main() { > fputs("hi\n", stdout); > } > > The reason is that stdout gets a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation, but is
2013 Sep 24
4
[LLVMdev] [lld] ELF needs type for SharedLibraryAtom.
On 9/23/2013 7:07 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> int main() { >> fputs("hi\n", stdout); >>
2010 Jun 03
3
Multiple Serial Port Passthrough in HVM domU
So, I made a mistake a bought four systems with the Intel Core i3 processors, without doing my homework to make sure that these systems actually supported VTd. Turns out there''s plenty of information out there indicating that the Core i3 processors do *not* support VTd. I was counting on VTd for two applications: Graphics Passthrough and passing through a PCIe 4-port serial card. Of
2012 Oct 02
3
[PATCH] VT-d: make remap_entry_to_msi_msg() return consistent message
During debugging of another problem I found that in x2APIC mode, the destination field of the low address value wasn''t passed back correctly. While this is benign in most cases (as the value isn''t being used anywhere), it can be confusing (and misguiding) when printing the value read or when comparing it to the one previously passed into the inverse function. Signed-off-by: Jan