similar to: [RFC][PATCH][UPDATED] Intel(R) LaGrande Technology support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[RFC][PATCH][UPDATED] Intel(R) LaGrande Technology support"

2007 Apr 12
4
Re: [Xense-devel] [RFC][PATCH][UPDATED] Intel(R) LaGrande Technology support
Hello, Has any more work been done on this front? The message below is from Sept. 2006. In particular, the LT/TXT Technology Enabling Platform (TEP) is now available from MPC Corp. Where can one obtain an appropriate AC SINIT module (i.e., like lpg_sinit_20050831_pae.auth.bin below)? I would like to begin using Xen with TXT support. Thanks, -Jon This patch adds SMP support to the
2010 Jan 29
2
support for hvm
my server has intel q9550 cpu (which supports intel-vt) and intel s3200 motherboard. BIOS has enabled intel virtualisation. centos 5.4, 64bit [root@localhost ~]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-164.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 04:03:03 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@localhost ~]# grep vmx /proc/cpuinfo flags           : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat pse36
2005 Aug 18
4
[PATCH] ACM: adding C-support for policy translation and labeling support for domains
This patch: * adds a C-based security policy translation tool to Xen (secpol_xml2bin) and removes the current Java security policy translator (Java dependencies). The C-based tool integrates into the Xen source tree build and install (using gnome libxml2 for XML parsing). See install.txt. * introduces security labels and related tools. Users can now use semantic-rich label names to put
2017 Jul 06
2
Live Migration and LibVirt CPU Mode
Hi All, First time mailing here, I hope someone can help. We?re running a OpenStack Newton environment on top of CentOS-7.3, LibVirt and Qemu-KVM-EV. We are encountered an issue live migrating a VM between 2 hosts with different CPUs and LibVirt throws the following error: libvirtError: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features:
2014 Feb 28
2
'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
Hi On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the package versions of libvirt-bin are identical: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1. /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml files are
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
Hi Martin Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor
2018 Sep 30
1
libvirt reported capabilities doesn't match /proc/cpuinfo while the model does match
Hi, According to virsh capabilities I only have the following cpu features: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>IvyBridge-IBRS</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <microcode version='32'/> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> <feature name='ds'/>
2005 Jun 21
3
[PATCH] Makefiles of policy_tool
This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in uninstall target from top level Makefile. Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <aquynh@gmail.com> Makefile | 1 + tools/policy/Makefile | 19 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
2008 Nov 24
2
More than doubling performance with snow
Hey my R buddies, I installed the "snow" and "rpvm" package on my Lenovo Thinkpad T400 today. The experiment below gave me a surprise. The time consumed by serial processing was several times larger than that taken by parallel processing. I'm very curious how this happened. Thank you very much. > library(snow) > > cc <- makePVMcluster(2) > > temp <-
2009 Apr 24
2
TBOOT and extlinux
Hi, I'm trying to get to the bottom of a problem using the combination of tboot (http://tboot.sf.net, trusted boot kernel for Intel TXT) and extlinux. TBOOT loads using the multiboot protocol, where the tboot "kernel" is loaded as the kernel, and the actual linux kernel and initrd are specified as modules. A working grub configuration looks something like:
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: >> >> # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx
2007 Sep 19
4
vtpm_manager can''t run twice in a row
I can get vtpm_manager to run if I delete /var/vtpm/VTPM. However, when I kill it with control-c, and try to run it again, I get: INFO[VTPM]: Starting VTPM. INFO[TCS]: Constructing new TCS: INFO[TCS]: Calling TCS_OpenContext: INFO[VTSP]: OIAP. INFO[VTSP]: Loading Key into TPM. INFO[VTSP]: Unbinding 256 bytes of data. ERROR in VTSP_Unbind at vtsp.c:720 code: TPM_BAD_PARAMETER. ERROR in
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >>>> Hi Martin >>>> >>>> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: >>>>
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
2005 Aug 17
1
[PATCH] vTPM support for XEN - Part 1
Attached is the patch that provides additions to include files, particularly to support the control messages for the TPM front- and backend drivers. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com> Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2013 Jun 17
2
Re: Fwd: Haswell 4770 misidentified as Sandy Bridge
On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:
2015 Feb 04
2
CPU model and missing AES-NI extension
Hi, today I tried to configure a guest using Virt-Manager and used the "copy host cpu configuration" option which resultet in a "Sandy Bridge" model. What I noticed is that for example the "aes" extension is not available in the guest even though it is available on the host cpu. This is what the host cpu looks like: model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @
2012 Dec 07
3
(no subject)
Hi All, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 with QEMU+KVM for Virtualization. I have successfully created a Windows 2003 VM with 4GB of RAM. The host server is an HP ML350 G8 with 24GB RAM and 24 cores. Details of one of the cores is shown below: processor : 23 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @
2013 Sep 11
2
New APC "SMT" UPSes support MODBUS, will there be support in NUT?
Hi All, About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf "Application Note #176 Modbus Implementation in APC Smart-UPS" The APC "announcement" appeared on their site in their user blogs by an APC employee, here:
2007 Jan 12
11
Regarding Xen security....
Hi Sir, I have a question regarding the security of Xen. What are the security threats in with Intel VT-x. Thanks, Praveen Kushwaha ________________________________________________________________________ _____________________ NEC HCL System Technologies Ltd., 4th Floor, Tower B, Logix Techno Park, Noida | Tel: 120 436 6777 Extn 748