similar to: [PATCH] Add lost logic for VGA initialization

This patch adds the ia64-specific code for new Qemu . In addition, some ia64 patches aren''t checked into xen-unstable.hg, so I reversed the related logic temporarily. Once sync with xen-ia64-unstable.hg, the logic will regain automatically. Thanks & Best Regards -Xiantao OTC,Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

I assume this commit message was supposed to be "Enable VGA acceleration for VTI" right? We''re not actually accelerating CGA right? Regards, Anthony Liguori Xen patchbot-unstable wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > # Node ID e67432187b88ee60433779ad0f004b532ed378c8 > # Parent 639ad22eb7c80ac21c3958747b879892680bdaba >

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 62895ff991d48398a77afdbf7f2bef127e802230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:57 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Add kvm arch-specific core code for > kvm/ia64. > > kvm_ia64.c is created to handle kvm ia64-specific core logic. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 62895ff991d48398a77afdbf7f2bef127e802230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:57 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Add kvm arch-specific core code for > kvm/ia64. > > kvm_ia64.c is created to handle kvm ia64-specific core logic. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang

This is a slightly modified version of the original VGA patch that removes changes to the configure script to check for SSE2 capabilities. SSE2 is now only checked at run time. Signed-off-by: Don Dugger <donald.d.dugger@intel.com> -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Donald.D.Dugger@intel.com Ph: (303)440-1368 diff -r c445d4a0dd76

Due to IA64 balloon driver not ready and it depends on max memory value to allocate its memory. So this fix is necessary now. Thanks & Best Regards -Xiantao OTC,Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi Xiantao, I general I think the code in this patch is fine. I have a couple of nit-picking comments: > + if (target_mask&0x1) { The formatting here isn't quite what most of the kernel does. It would be better if you added spaces so it's a little easier to read, ie: if (target_mask & 0x1) { > + p = &__per_cpu_idtrs[cpu][0][0]; > + for (i = IA64_TR_ALLOC_BASE;

Hi Xiantao, I general I think the code in this patch is fine. I have a couple of nit-picking comments: > + if (target_mask&0x1) { The formatting here isn't quite what most of the kernel does. It would be better if you added spaces so it's a little easier to read, ie: if (target_mask & 0x1) { > + p = &__per_cpu_idtrs[cpu][0][0]; > + for (i = IA64_TR_ALLOC_BASE;

From: Zhang Xiantao <xiantao.zhang@intel.com> With virtual EPT support, L1 hyerpvisor can use EPT hardware for L2 guest''s memory virtualization. In this way, L2 guest''s performance can be improved sharply. According to our testing, some benchmarks can show > 5x performance gain. Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <xiantao.zhang@intel.com> Zhang Xiantao (11):

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi Folks, > We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now > Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance > on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86 > platform, and is short of cross-architecture framework. Currently, we > have a proposal for KVM source layout to accommodate new

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi Folks, > We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now > Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance > on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86 > platform, and is short of cross-architecture framework. Currently, we > have a proposal for KVM source layout to accommodate new

Akio, Thank you for pointing out this issue. Maybe I sent out the older one incorrectly.:( Thanks again. -Xiantao OTC,Intel Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@jp.fujitsu.com] > Sent: 2006年7月26日 19:24 > To: Zhang, Xiantao; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel]

Currently it is assumed PCI device BAR access < 4G memory. If there is such a device whose BAR size is larger than 4G, it must access > 4G memory address. This patch enable the 64bits big BAR support on hvmloader. v3 changes from v2: - Remain original print information v2 changes from v1 as comments by Jan. 1) Set Dynamic MMIO high memory address instead of a fixed number 640G 2) Mask

2011/7/19 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>: > CC''ing Tim and xen-devel > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: >> 2011/7/16 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>: >> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: >> >> 2011/7/15 Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@gmail.com>: >> >> > 2011/7/15

flight 13627 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13627/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 13625 test-amd64-amd64-win 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 13625 test-i386-i386-xl-win 5 xen-boot

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 6b731c15afa8cec84f16408c421c286f1dd1b7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:45:40 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add TLB virtulization support. > > vtlb.c includes tlb/VHPT virtulization. > Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu at intel.com> >

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 0d698efed15759b49e78adcef085feda0a14a175 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:57:09 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Add optimization for some virtulization > faults > > optvfault.S Add optimization for some performance-critical > virtualization faults. >

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 5c70c038c57190144390ae9d30c3d06afba103d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:59:30 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add kvm sal/pal virtulization support. > > Some sal/pal calls would be traped to kvm for virtulization > from guest firmware. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 697d50286088e98da5ac8653c80aaa96c81abf87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:50:24 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Implement smp_call_function_mask for ia64 > > This function provides more flexible interface for smp > infrastructure. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 697d50286088e98da5ac8653c80aaa96c81abf87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:50:24 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Implement smp_call_function_mask for ia64 > > This function provides more flexible interface for smp > infrastructure. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang