similar to: quick pointers needed

Hi, I am trying to create a dotplot where each panel shows levels vs. responses; the levels are sorted by responses but levels vary from one panel to another. However, I run into problems with controlling the y-limits and y-labels. In particular, suppose I have a data frame rsp <- c(10,2,4,0,2,3) lvl <-

Hi, System: Netra 1405, 4x450Mhz, 4GB RAM and 2x146GB (root pool) and 2x146GB (space pool). snv_98. After a panic the system hangs on boot and manual attempts to mount (at least) one dataset in single user mode, hangs. The Panic: Dec 27 04:42:11 base ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=300021c1a20: Dec 27 04:42:11 base unix: [ID 521688 kern.notice] [AFT1] errID 0x00167f73.1c737868 UE Error(s) Dec 27

The following IR implements the following nested loop: for (int i = start ; i < end ; ++i ) for (int p = 0 ; p < 4 ; ++p ) a[i*4+p] = b[i*4+p] + c[i*4+p]; define void @main(i64 %arg0, i64 %arg1, i1 %arg2, i64 %arg3, float* noalias %arg4, float* noalias %arg5, float* noalias %arg6) { entrypoint: br i1 %arg2, label %L0, label %L1 L0:

The loop vectorizer relies on cleanup passes to be run after it: from Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp: // Add the various vectorization passes and relevant cleanup passes for // them since we are no longer in the middle of the main scalar pipeline. MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass(DisableUnrollLoops)); MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());

I have a strange problem with a faulted zpool (two way mirror): [root at einstein;0]~# zpool status poolm pool: poolm state: FAULTED scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM poolm UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas mirror UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data c2t0d0s0 ONLINE 0

The instcombine pass cleans up a lot. Any idea why there are still shufflevector, insertelement, *and* bitcast (!!) etc. instructions left? The original loop is so clean, a textbook example I'd say. There is no need to shuffle anything.At least I don't see it. Frank vector.ph: ; preds = %L5 %broadcast.splatinsert1 = insertelement <4 x

Hi. I tried to send this to the mailing list, but it never showed up in the archives, so I''m trying the forum instead... I recently installed the Crossbow Beta October 31 2008 on my SunFire T1000, and let me first say that I''m very pleased with the functionality it provides. What''s not so pleasing is the fact that after installing this, the computer now get very

Dear R-people: I tried to create a shared library in Windows XP. However I got error messages which attached below: C:\lasso>Rcmd SHLIB all.f cox.f gcc all.o libR makeMakedeps all.dll -o all gcc.exe: libR: No such file or directory gcc.exe: makeMakedeps: No such file or directory make: *** [all] Error 1 I have created shard libraries successfully before. Also for the same fortran files:

Hi, How does the requirement that phi instructions have one value per predecessor basic block interact with indirectbr instructions? For instance, take the following code: L1: br i1 %somevalue, label %L2, label %L3 L2: %ret1 = i8* blockaddress(@myfunction, %L5) br label %L4 L3: %ret2 = i8* blockaddress(@myfunction, %L6) br label %L4 L4: %ret = phi i8* [%ret1, L2], [%ret2, L3]

Hi David! Many thanks for your very encouraging and kind feedback!!! (Hope you don't mind that I made your post public on the Theora channel). I try to be the more sincere as I can in my posts.Some people suggested me to make demo pages to explain how the codec works step by step, and I realize that it would be good, because certainly it will show that the NHW codec is not that complex and

I am trying a setup where the one loop is rewritten as two loops. This avoids the 'rem' and 'div' instructions in the index calculation (which give the loop vectorizer a hard time). However, with this setup the loop vectorizer complains about a too small loop. LV: Checking a loop in "main" LV: Found a loop: L3 LV: Found a loop with a very small trip count. This loop

Hello all, I don't understand a strange behavior in data frame manipulation. data_frame1 = data.frame(Site = c("S1", "S2", "S3", "S4", "L1", "L2", "L3", "L4"), Number = c(1, 3, 5, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1)) data_frame2 = data_frame1 [data_frame1$Site != "S1", ] dput (data_frame2) structure(list(Site =

In the case when coming from C it was probably the loop unroller and SLP vectorizer which vectorized the code. Potentially I could do the same in the IR. However, the loop body that is generated in the IR can get very large. Thus, the loop unroller will refuse to unroll the loop in a large number of (important) cases. Isn't there a way to convince the loop vectorizer that it should

Hello, For those interested, I have added a -l4 high compression setting to the NHW codec ( http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ ).This setting is very experimental, I have boosted the sharpness for this one, but it can lack of precision on low contrast areas. This setting still maintains a good neatness and when it will be validated, I will then make a new 0.1.4 version for the NHW Project. High

I plan to use virtualization infrastructure to JIT VM Kernel Code. Michael Engel has done that in the past to have dynamic aspect in the Kernel: http://llvm.org/pubs/2005-03-14-ACP4IS-AspectsKernel.pdf He used L4 based Hypervisor and Virtual Machines. Can this not be done or am I missing something? -Ashish On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi to all, I am trying to run breakpoints() on a fairly large sample (>10.000 observations). The process is very slow, any idea on how to speed this up? I have tried the hpc="foreach" parameter, but this didn't work at all when I tried to run it on a smaller sample. breakpoints(x ~ x.l1 + x.l2 + X.l3 + x.l4 + x.l5 + x.l6 + x.l7 + x.l8 + y.l1 + y.l2 + y.l3 + y.l4 + y.l5 + y.l6

Hello, I have improved quality for -l4 and -l5 high compression settings.These settings are now really better and very competitive, I now prefer them compared to x265 (HEVC). Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ I am also working on -l6 quality setting, I can simply increase quantization for it but I am not totally satisfied with this solution for now... Looking for more advanced processing

Hi, I just found out that ZFS triggers a kernel-panic while switching a mounted volume into read-only mode: The system is attached to a Symmetrix, all zfs-io goes through Powerpath: I ran some io-intensive stuff on /tank/foo and switched the device into read-only mode at the same time (symrdf -g bar failover -establish). ZFS went ''bam'' and triggered a Panic: WARNING: /pci at

On 2008-09-27 18:29, Ashish Bijlani wrote: > I plan to use virtualization infrastructure to JIT VM Kernel Code. > Michael Engel has done that in the past to have dynamic aspect in the > Kernel: http://llvm.org/pubs/2005-03-14-ACP4IS-AspectsKernel.pdf > > He used L4 based Hypervisor and Virtual Machines. Can this not be done > or am I missing something? > I think you'll

On 10/12/2016 3:15 PM, Alex Bradley wrote: > > Yes the result goes into memory. But the *address* of that destination > memory location also needs to be loaded first into a register. > Your architecture has a single instruction for the following operation? define void @foo(i32 **%a, i32**%b) { entry: %l1 = load i32*, i32** %a, align 4 %l2 = load i32, i32* %l1, align 4 %l3 =