similar to: RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: Uses of &frame_table[xfn]

>From: Keir Fraser >Sent: 2005年12月30日 4:34 > >On 29 Dec 2005, at 18:51, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote: > >> So then is p==m in dom0 (and driver domains) an unacceptable design >> alternative for (non-x86) Xen architectures? If it is acceptable, >> then the question remains: > >I think *that* is the critical question here. My feeling is that

Yang, Fred wrote: > Dan, > >> From Xen summit, isn''t it to be more P2M liked approach due to > consideration on driver domain and domain0 needs to get P2M for > VBD/VNIF? > > Don''t remember there is decision on taking Hypercall only approach and > dropped P2M table lookup. Any justification here? To me having an array like x86 xenlinux is much

Dear R experts, I am posting this question on behalf of a Japanese R user who wants to know how to change the siginificant codes default. As you know, R's default significant codes are: Signif. codes: 0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1 But he says that it is usual in economics to give codes such as `***' for 0.01, `**' for 0.05 and `*' for

Attached patch makes the balloon driver arch-neutral (compiles on ia64... look ma, no #ifdef''s!). Please apply to xen-unstable. One change should be eyeballed, line 257 in balloon.c, because phys_to_machine_mapping[pfn] is not identical to pfn_to_mfn (different by sign bit, should be OK?) Signed-off by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@hp.com> diff -r 0255f48b757f

Howdy What I 'd like to analyze with a large data on building permits is to find time series effect of urban policy on buildings as well as cross-sectional effects in any. In 1990 the specialZone urban policy was introduced. I guess that the effects of this specialZone policy would be different from countys. There are counties that do not welcome this specialZone forced to design it. One of

Hi, Olaf we have tested the xenpaging feature and found some problems. (1) the test case like this : when we start a VM with POD enable, the xenpaging is started at the same time. this case will cause many problems ,finally, we fixed the BUG, the patch is attached below. (2) there is a very serious problem. we have observed many VM crash examples, the error code is not always the same.

Hey folks! I want to add a CentOS 5.2 domU to an existing server (Fedora 8) which was setup by another company. The Dom0 does not provide any other services but a BIND-DHCP-server (they deleted dnsmasq and installed bind). Don''t ask my why they did that. My new DomU is connected to eth0, which is a bridge. BIND also listens on eth0 to serve other machines. I start the install of centos

Hi, Can someone interpret how HVM guest communicate with domain0, as i know, H VM can not use event channel directly, is the platform-pci offer a way to solve this? Please try to explain concretely, for example : 1.how does HVM send a event to domain0, how does domain0 catch this event, and assoicate it with a handler 2.the opposite direction, how does domain0 send event to HVM guest? Does it

Hi everyone! I have the following setup: domain0 |-domU1 |-domU2 |-domU3 I am running this with libvirt on a XEN server. Right now the server is connected to our office network, but later it will be in a hosted environment. I need domU1 and domU3 to have a public IP, and all of the domUs and the dom0 should have an internal IP address to communicate with each other. So this is what I would like

Dear, "Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64). * Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen. * Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64. * Xenoppix-x86-64 also

i have downloaded the CentOS distribution that comes with Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) at http://www.xen.org/download/xcp/index.html. i am trying to install the parted utility. yum install parted however, i get the following message. Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Setting up Install Process No package parted available. Nothing to do any ideas on what's

Hi all. I have still network issues. I''m now able to connect two virtual domains with a bridge defined in domain0. But this is not what I want. I don''t want to affect domain0 in any way what means no network connections between the domain0 and the virtual domains. I just want to define a ''cross-over cable'' connecting eth0 of the first domU with the eth0 of the

Hello: It used to work after I first setting up domain0 and all the guest OSs. Now suddently it won''t work to ping any servers from domain0. Strangely, if I launch any guest OSs on domain 0, those Guest OSs can ping any servers. Rebooting domain0 sometime works sometime won''t work. Any clues .... Thanks, xen __________________________________________________ Do You

Hi, next step, # dmesg | grep pciback Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) ) Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) Unknown boot option

Hi, Jeremy Since now the pv_ops domain0 is approaching, we are considering to port the dom0 power management related code, or more specifically, the Cx/Px ACPI info parsing code, to pv_ops domain0 tree, so that people can utilize Xen power management capability (Cx/PX) under pv_ops domain0. This RFC is a draft version for comments. === Overview === Requirement: Xen hypervisor need Cx/Px ACPI

Dear, We released New Xenoppix (based on Xen3.0, CD size). Detail HP http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html 670MB knoppix_v4.0.2CD_20050923_xen3.0-20060104+IPAFont_cdsize.iso --------------------------------- # New Features * Xen is updated to version 3.0. * Host-Xenoppix(Knoppix on Domain0) boots Guest-Xenoppix(Knoppix on DomainU) with same kernel and same Root

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:55:04AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> >> Yeah, but why did it happen when i directly issue guest VM

Hi there, I am using xen hypervisor for analysing guest to guest communication throughput. I have Quad Core Intel Xeon server with F11 installed on it. My Dom0 and DomU specs are: Dom0: #uname -ra Linux HPCNL-SR-2 2.6.30-rc6-tip #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 12:26:16 PKST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux DomU: # uname -ra Linux F11-G5S2 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE #1 SMP Wed May 27 17:28:22 EDT 2009 i686 i686

Hi there, I am using xen hypervisor for analysing guest to guest communication throughput. I have Quad Core Intel Xeon server with F11 installed on it. My Dom0 and DomU specs are: Dom0: #uname -ra Linux HPCNL-SR-2 2.6.30-rc6-tip #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 12:26:16 PKST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux DomU: # uname -ra Linux F11-G5S2 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE #1 SMP Wed May 27 17:28:22 EDT 2009 i686 i686