Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "netfilter debug patch info"
2003 Feb 26
2
[Bug 55] ICMP translation problem with local NAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |2
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org
2004 Oct 31
9
Maquerading through IPSECed wireless dropping packets selectively?
Hello,
I''m stuck IPSECing my wireless network at home and would appreciate any
comments. I appologize in advance if I''m wasting your time with trivia -
I''m not a professional and staring at the problem for days from various
angles hasn''t done me any good ...
My home server/firewall (morannon) is hooked up through an USB to
ethernet adapter (eth1) to my DSL
2003 Feb 14
1
[Bug 48] conntrack breaks udp path mtu discovery
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:02 -------
This is a really hard
2004 Feb 25
4
[Bug 48] conntrack breaks udp path mtu discovery
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48
------- Additional Comments From tatonet@tiscali.it 2004-02-25 15:05 -------
I know that this is an old bug report, but it's still opened...
If we save the size of each single fragment we have to face another problem:
how should we re-fragment the packet if original fragments were partially or
totally overlapped?
2006 May 05
0
iptables time match mangle stage
Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and
the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I
really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting.
Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables 1.3.5 so
time matching can occur in the post routing?
machinenemae login: ipt_time loading
ipt_time:
2006 May 07
1
time matching in the mangle stage?? is it possible??
Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and
the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I
really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting.
Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables 1.3.5 so
time matching can occur in the post routing?
machinenemae login: ipt_time loading
ipt_time:
2007 Apr 18
4
[Bridge] [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged {I, AR}P packets
Hi all,
The patch below does four trivial changes and one big change
Trivial changes, these are all in br_netfilter.c:
- check ar_pln==4 when giving bridged ARP packets to arptables
- delete unnecessary if in br_nf_local_in
- add more logging for the "Argh" message
- add some brag-comments in the file head comment
Big change: let {ip,arp}tables see VLAN tagged {I,AR}P packets.
This
2007 Apr 18
2
[Bridge] Re: Policy match with a bridge
Tom Eastep wrote:
> | Have you applied the ipsec+netfilter patches ? Without them, packets
> are
> | only seen encrypted in the OUTPUT chain.
> |
> Yes -- the ipsec+netfilter patches are applied. Here is the same test
> with the bridge removed and the local ip address transfered to one of
> the network cards:
The problem is ipv4_sabotage_out in the briding code. It
2004 Nov 29
1
Re: CentOS digest, Vol 1 #201 - 1 msg
thanks for the head up. what os are you running on the blades??
Phillip James
System Administrator
The Garden City Group, Inc.
105 Maxess Road
Melville, NY 11747-3836
Phone: (631) 470-5044
Fax: (631) 940-6561
E-mail: Phillip.James at GardenCityGroup.com
====================================================
This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of
the intended
2002 Dec 20
1
Strange behavior with samba mountpoint
I have a Redhat 8.0 box with many external connections.
Several nfs and 3 samba.
Today I tried to reattach to one on my mounts and I am geting
"Could not resolve mount point /mnt/dir".
If I do an ls -a I can see the dir, but when adding the l option to ls
it does not show up.
fuser returns for the dir,
Input/output error
I apologize if this has nothing to do with Samba, but I am
2015 Mar 04
1
PJSIP works on UDP but not TCP
Hi all,
I have Asterisk 13 running and I'm currently trying to get PJSIP working on
TCP.
My transport looks like this. My box is not behind NAT.
[transport-tcp]
type=transport
protocol=tcp
bind=0.0.0.0:5061
My endpoint looks like this:
[user1]
type=endpoint
transport=transport-tcp
context=local_out
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=g722
auth=user1
aors=user1
direct_media=no
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Some Questions
I am battling an issue with use of bridging with xen.
For some yet undetermined reason supposedly relating to stp, they assign
a mac address of fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff to the bridge.
Was hoping someone here may be able to elaborate on that.
If I enslave a bridge to an ethernet, and than restart that network
interface, should the bridge operation behave the same after the ip
interface is restarted?
2016 Nov 28
1
CentOS 6.4 tcp_fatretrans_alert causes panic
Hi all,
Our kernel is 2.6.32-358.14.1.x86_64, recently dozens of them panicked,
since it's been OK for a long time and the problem emerged all of a sudden,
I'm not sure if an upgrade caused this problem. Here's what I got from
backtracing:
PID: 8136 TASK: ffff8803341aead0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: ""
#0 [ffff880028283610] panic at ffffffff815286b8
#1 [ffff880028283690]
2006 Jan 25
8
[Bug 400] connection tracking does not work on VLANs if underlying interface is a bridge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=400
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 12:55 MET -------
Please add a LOG rule to PRE_ROUTING in the mangle table and post the output.
BTW, are you using hardware checksumming (check with ethtool) on the underlying
ethernet device?
--
Configure bugmail:
2006 Jun 23
3
No eth0 in DomU in FC5
If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following:
Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization.
DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
config:
kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU"
#ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img"
memory = 128
name = "fedora1"
#dhcp = "dhcp"
disk =
2006 May 21
0
[Bug 478] New: Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=478
Summary: Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt
handler!
Product: iptables
Version: 1.3.5
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Fedora
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: iptables
AssignedTo:
2005 Sep 27
2
invalid network interface after starting xend
Before starting xend (xen 3.0) these are my correct network interfaces:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:04
inet addr:192.168.1.51 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:05
inet addr:192.168.1.52 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet
2001 Nov 21
2
Assertion failure in journal_bmap() at journal.c:636: "ret != 0"
A scsi error (caused possibly by a loose cable) has left the processes
accessing my ext3 file system hung in an unkillable state after it
triggered an assert in ext3's journaling layer. I assume my only
recourse at this point is to reboot. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Log messages appended.
Thanks,
-Jim
Nov 21 04:04:04 attila kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 5 lun 0
2001 Aug 02
0
ext3 0.0.7a Assertion
Hi,
Doing the following I can generate an assertion in ext3 0.0.7a.
I have an ext3 filesystem on /foo. I export /foo via nfs. I then mount
via localhost:/foo onto /mnt. Start up a dd to generate a file on the nfs
mount. (cd /mnt; dd if=/dev/zero of=./dd.out bs=1024k), then on the
localhost filesystem /foo I rm the file. rm -f /foo/dd.out.
This results in "ext3_free_inode: bit already
2005 Jun 03
3
bad blocks showing up
I am getting a few bad sector messages in my /var/log/messages.
I have read where an "fsck -c -c /dev/hda" may be what I need.
Before I go doing such things I am looking for confirmation that
that is what I should do. Anyone please comment on how to
tell linux to not use sectors in my disk. This is stright IDE no
raid not nothing at this point /dev/hda is all.
Thanks,
jerry