similar to: netfilter debug patch info

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "netfilter debug patch info"

2003 Feb 26
2
[Bug 55] ICMP translation problem with local NAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org
2004 Oct 31
9
Maquerading through IPSECed wireless dropping packets selectively?
Hello, I''m stuck IPSECing my wireless network at home and would appreciate any comments. I appologize in advance if I''m wasting your time with trivia - I''m not a professional and staring at the problem for days from various angles hasn''t done me any good ... My home server/firewall (morannon) is hooked up through an USB to ethernet adapter (eth1) to my DSL
2003 Feb 14
1
[Bug 48] conntrack breaks udp path mtu discovery
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:02 ------- This is a really hard
2004 Feb 25
4
[Bug 48] conntrack breaks udp path mtu discovery
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 ------- Additional Comments From tatonet@tiscali.it 2004-02-25 15:05 ------- I know that this is an old bug report, but it's still opened... If we save the size of each single fragment we have to face another problem: how should we re-fragment the packet if original fragments were partially or totally overlapped?
2006 May 05
0
iptables time match mangle stage
Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting. Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables 1.3.5 so time matching can occur in the post routing? machinenemae login: ipt_time loading ipt_time:
2006 May 07
1
time matching in the mangle stage?? is it possible??
Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting. Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables 1.3.5 so time matching can occur in the post routing? machinenemae login: ipt_time loading ipt_time:
2007 Apr 18
4
[Bridge] [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged {I, AR}P packets
Hi all, The patch below does four trivial changes and one big change Trivial changes, these are all in br_netfilter.c: - check ar_pln==4 when giving bridged ARP packets to arptables - delete unnecessary if in br_nf_local_in - add more logging for the "Argh" message - add some brag-comments in the file head comment Big change: let {ip,arp}tables see VLAN tagged {I,AR}P packets. This
2007 Apr 18
2
[Bridge] Re: Policy match with a bridge
Tom Eastep wrote: > | Have you applied the ipsec+netfilter patches ? Without them, packets > are > | only seen encrypted in the OUTPUT chain. > | > Yes -- the ipsec+netfilter patches are applied. Here is the same test > with the bridge removed and the local ip address transfered to one of > the network cards: The problem is ipv4_sabotage_out in the briding code. It
2004 Nov 29
1
Re: CentOS digest, Vol 1 #201 - 1 msg
thanks for the head up. what os are you running on the blades?? Phillip James System Administrator The Garden City Group, Inc. 105 Maxess Road Melville, NY 11747-3836 Phone: (631) 470-5044 Fax: (631) 940-6561 E-mail: Phillip.James at GardenCityGroup.com ==================================================== This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the intended
2002 Dec 20
1
Strange behavior with samba mountpoint
I have a Redhat 8.0 box with many external connections. Several nfs and 3 samba. Today I tried to reattach to one on my mounts and I am geting "Could not resolve mount point /mnt/dir". If I do an ls -a I can see the dir, but when adding the l option to ls it does not show up. fuser returns for the dir, Input/output error I apologize if this has nothing to do with Samba, but I am
2015 Mar 04
1
PJSIP works on UDP but not TCP
Hi all, I have Asterisk 13 running and I'm currently trying to get PJSIP working on TCP. My transport looks like this. My box is not behind NAT. [transport-tcp] type=transport protocol=tcp bind=0.0.0.0:5061 My endpoint looks like this: [user1] type=endpoint transport=transport-tcp context=local_out disallow=all allow=alaw allow=ulaw allow=g722 auth=user1 aors=user1 direct_media=no
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Some Questions
I am battling an issue with use of bridging with xen. For some yet undetermined reason supposedly relating to stp, they assign a mac address of fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff to the bridge. Was hoping someone here may be able to elaborate on that. If I enslave a bridge to an ethernet, and than restart that network interface, should the bridge operation behave the same after the ip interface is restarted?
2016 Nov 28
1
CentOS 6.4 tcp_fatretrans_alert causes panic
Hi all, Our kernel is 2.6.32-358.14.1.x86_64, recently dozens of them panicked, since it's been OK for a long time and the problem emerged all of a sudden, I'm not sure if an upgrade caused this problem. Here's what I got from backtracing: PID: 8136 TASK: ffff8803341aead0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "" #0 [ffff880028283610] panic at ffffffff815286b8 #1 [ffff880028283690]
2006 Jan 25
8
[Bug 400] connection tracking does not work on VLANs if underlying interface is a bridge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=400 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 12:55 MET ------- Please add a LOG rule to PRE_ROUTING in the mangle table and post the output. BTW, are you using hardware checksumming (check with ethtool) on the underlying ethernet device? -- Configure bugmail:
2006 Jun 23
3
No eth0 in DomU in FC5
If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following: Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" #ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img" memory = 128 name = "fedora1" #dhcp = "dhcp" disk =
2006 May 21
0
[Bug 478] New: Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:
2005 Sep 27
2
invalid network interface after starting xend
Before starting xend (xen 3.0) these are my correct network interfaces: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:04 inet addr:192.168.1.51 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:05 inet addr:192.168.1.52 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet
2001 Nov 21
2
Assertion failure in journal_bmap() at journal.c:636: "ret != 0"
A scsi error (caused possibly by a loose cable) has left the processes accessing my ext3 file system hung in an unkillable state after it triggered an assert in ext3's journaling layer. I assume my only recourse at this point is to reboot. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Log messages appended. Thanks, -Jim Nov 21 04:04:04 attila kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 5 lun 0
2001 Aug 02
0
ext3 0.0.7a Assertion
Hi, Doing the following I can generate an assertion in ext3 0.0.7a. I have an ext3 filesystem on /foo. I export /foo via nfs. I then mount via localhost:/foo onto /mnt. Start up a dd to generate a file on the nfs mount. (cd /mnt; dd if=/dev/zero of=./dd.out bs=1024k), then on the localhost filesystem /foo I rm the file. rm -f /foo/dd.out. This results in "ext3_free_inode: bit already
2005 Jun 03
3
bad blocks showing up
I am getting a few bad sector messages in my /var/log/messages. I have read where an "fsck -c -c /dev/hda" may be what I need. Before I go doing such things I am looking for confirmation that that is what I should do. Anyone please comment on how to tell linux to not use sectors in my disk. This is stright IDE no raid not nothing at this point /dev/hda is all. Thanks, jerry