similar to: [PATCH][9/10] Support VMX guests with 512M/1G memory.

Here is a patch to the Debian xen-3 3.4.0-1 package that reenables ioemu. I have been using it for the last four weeks. (I understand there are reasons this cannot go into Debian yet, but hopefully it will be useful to people that depend on running HVMs today.) Anders -------------- next part -------------- --- xen-3/debian/changelog +++ xen-3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xen-3

Use copy_from_user when accessing guest_pt[] Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com> diff -r 2d289d7ab961 -r d0eccea63a24 xen/arch/x86/shadow.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/shadow.c Thu Jun 30 05:26:09 2005 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/shadow.c Thu Jun 30 05:26:24 2005 @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ unsigned long gpfn, unsigned index) { unsigned long smfn = __shadow_status(d, gpfn, PGT_snapshot);

Hi, I have a machine with 1.5G memory. When I try to boot a image of size 700M, it fails. In fact, it seems like the image is loading downward from 512M. Is this a hardware problem, or something that can be fixed ?

Subject of Hint: How to create a Bootable Live CD/DVD from your Linux From Scratch (LFS) build Good day from Singapore, I am Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, based in Singapore. I have recently *successfully* created my own custom Linux distribution called Teo En Ming Linux 2020.03 (FINAL), which is based on Linux From Scratch 20200302-systemd book and Linux Kernel 5.5.7, on 12 March

I was installing centos 5.3 x86_64 on a sempron 2.7G machine with 512M ram. The install started off fine then REALLY SLOWED down about 70% into install. I did have a swap space. after that it just crawled. I tried restart the install a couple times at 512M. Same thing around 70% the slow down. I then put in 1G of RAM and everything zipped on past and finished fine. Does 5.3 have minimum

Why not? Thanks? -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dear Gustaf, I wish you a happy new year! I am a PhD Staff at LSHTM and I have been trying to use WHO anthro macros in R with the file you posted on internet but when I double check the WHZ, HAZ, WAZ output with output from ENA or STATA, it differs slightly. Do you have any idea why that might be the case? Many thanks Severine

Hello find /etc -size -1G should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a list of empty file (size=0) find /etc -size -2G work fine and return all the files This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 ! Did I miss something or is it a bug ? Regards -- Alain Spineux | aspineux gmail com Your email 100% available |

Everytime i start wine i get this error: Code: Warning: Memory above 0x80000000 doesn't seem to be accessible. Wine requires a 3G/1G user/kernel memory split to work properly. Any help?

Hi, thanks for all the feedback and topics. May be I can/should draw a better picture of my settings and question. We "still" use samba 3.6.9-167 from Red Hat with an openldap backend. I tried from an older posting somewhere: socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 But there was no noticeable impact. The log level = 2. Thats all I changed

The guestfish prepared disks (-N option) all defaulted to 100M. This has always been too small for btrfs (so for example ‘-N fs:btrfs’ has failed for a long time), and can be too small for LVs with new LVM2 / kernel >= 4.16. This changes the default from 100M to 1G. The beginning of the 1.39 branch seems like a good time to make this change. --- fish/guestfish.pod | 14 +++++++-------

Hi, I'm looking for some recommendations for a "fast" fileserver regarding the hardware you use. We have different fileservers as our requirements changed over time. The "main" problem we are faced with is, that with smb (windows 7 and OS X) clients we never get really close to GBit speed on reads or writes. Using the same servers/storages with ftp, ssh, rsync, nfs we

Hi, Attached patch tells the linker where to find libxenctrl.so.3.2, libxenguest.so.3.2 and libxenstore.so.3.0 when launching qemu-dm. Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> -- AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany Operating System Research Center Legal Information: AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift): Wilschdorfer Landstr.

Hi Tim, Could you please have a look at this bug? Thanks a lot. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1774 Best Regards, Yongjie Ren (Jay) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi all, this is the long awaited patch series to add xen device model support in qemu; the main author is Anthony Perard. Developing this series we tried to come up with the cleanest possible solution from the qemu point of view, limiting the amount of changes to common code as much as possible. The end result still requires a couple of hooks in piix_pci but overall the impact should be very