Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/ dead?"
2005 Sep 08
4
Booting FreeBSD diskless in DomU
Using the 2.0.6 demo cd image, I booted the supplied freebsd image and rsync''d
the file system to an NFS server. However I don not seem to be able to
succesfully boot from it the system just hangs here:
xn0: bpf attached
xn0: Ethernet address: aa:00:00:61:1c:d4
lo0: bpf
I have modified /sbin/start_freebsd.sh and /etc/xen/freebsd.py to generate
the following configuration:
xendemo:~#
2009 Sep 24
3
freebsd as domu
Hello!
Trying to find out some guides how to set up freebsd under xen, all i
found is pointing to www.fsmware.com,
<http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/download/> which is down! Maybe
someone could share freebsd image and config?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2006 Dec 12
1
Xen 3 FreeBSD mirrors?
Hi,
I''m trying to get hold the Xen 3 FreeBSD install kernel at
http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/ but to no avail. Are there any
mirrors available or does anyone know where I can get hold of it?
Thank you in advance,
Gerrit Niezen
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2005 Nov 22
6
FreeBSD 5.3 as DomU - new kernel with sysinstall embedded
On 16/11/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote:
> The way the initial memory space gets setup there is no way MFS could work.
> It wasn''t an anticipated use. I guess somewhere either in FreeBSD GNATS or
> xen''s bugzilla there should be i386-xen FreeBSD bugs filed for me to track.
I intend to file a bug report sooner or later, but in the meantime I
decided to
2006 Feb 01
1
Resizing Freebsd mdroot domU, on a RHEL4 dom0 machine.
I''ve gotten freebsd 7.0 domU working using the files here:
http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/downloads
on a rhel4 system using xen-3.0.0-7.1_rhel4.1 rpms.
but the root filesystem for freebsd is quite small:
demo# df -h | grep /
/dev/xbd1793a 496M 274M 182M 60% /
I''m wanting to resize the mdroot filesystem, but am unsure how. I have
no issues resizing ext*
2005 Jun 30
2
FreeBSD & Gentoo Images
Hello,
does anyone have a vbd file of these 2 Operating Systems ? So far I only
managed to get Debian Sarge installed properly with deboostrap.
I would be more than happy if anyone had a DiskImage or a good howto for
at least FreeBSD.
Thanks
Regards
Christian Keil
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2009 Aug 03
7
FreeBSD
dom0: Debian 5 Lenny 64bit, Xen 3.2-1
domU: FreeBSD (any version)
-----
Hello guys. I really need help. I wanna install FreeBSD as domU, but I cant
do it:
Where I can find 64 bit FreeBSD_kernel for xen?
I use many HOWTO.
I find freebsd-XENU <http://www.yuanjue.net/xen/freebsd-XENU>, but
# xm create -f /home/xen/freebsd71/conf
Using config file "/home/xen/freebsd71/conf".
Error:
2006 Oct 16
4
booting FreeBSD DomU
Hi!
May anyone assist me with booting FreeBSD DomU (under Debian Dom0). Now
I''m using the kernel-current, downloaded from Kip Macy site at
http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/download/
The problem is that I can''t specify _any_ root, the kernel can recognize:
Mount point / had 1 dangling refs
Manual root filesystem specification:
<fstype>:<device> Mount
2004 Mar 04
2
Short demo CD image
Hi,
While investigating why the Xen 1.2 Demo CD won''t boot on a particular
laptop, I noticed the download image appears to be truncated. "isoinfo
-d -i xendemo-1.2.iso" reports:
Logical block size is: 2048
Volume size is: 294080
That would suggest the image size should be 294080 * 2048 = 602275840
bytes. However I only have 292376 * 2048 = 598786048 bytes. The web
server
2004 Jun 04
3
Xen
I''ve been recently testing the Xendemo CD and I can say that Xen is awesome.
I''d like to start deploying it initially in some development/testing servers.
However the limitation of the max memory of 800MB or so per virtual machine is
a show stopper for many applications.
Are there plans to raise the limit to something higher (like 2GB or so)?
How difficult would it be?
2005 Mar 20
0
gdb sparse tree
A patch to the development tree for building the gdbserver used by
domu_debug can be found at:
http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/gdb/050319/gdbsparse.patch
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
2005 Mar 21
0
freebsd sparse tree for -testing
same rules for building as before
http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/5.3/050320/fbsdsparse-testing.patch
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
2006 Jan 09
0
FreeBSD + Xen 3.0
FreeBSD is now, with the notable exception of suspend, a stable functionally
complete domU on xen 3.0. I am currently in the process of adding dom0
support. Suspend support will be turned on as soon as the xenbus + newbus
integration work goes in.
It is unclear how much sense it would make to post a sparse tree as this is
all being done in -CURRENT (the development branch). However, as soon as
2005 Apr 30
4
[PATCH] disable writable pagetables on FreeBSD
Presumably as a result of recent changes, FreeBSD no longer works with
writable page tables. In the short-term I''m more interested in
functionality than performance. This patch disables them and fixes a
compile issue.
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2005/04/29 19:26:00-07:00 kmacy@curly.lab.netapp.com
# disable writable pagetables + compile
2005 Mar 08
29
Interrupt levels
I''m tracking performance on the machine I installed yesterday.
mutt running on one Xen instance, accessing via imap to another
instance, accessing via nfs the maildir in another instances, seems
little laggy when moving up and down the message index list.
Network latency seems low < 30ms on average.
So I was tracking vmstat.
On the mutt instances is seems reasonable:
[nic@shell:~]
2007 Jul 25
1
dspam plugin
Hello,
I'm trying to install the dspam plugin to dovecot.
So far, I've
Installed dovecot 1.0.2 from RPM and set up
Installed dspam 3.8.0, set up and integrated with postfix, using
dspam as local delivery agent before dovecot's deliver
Downloaded the dovecot 1.0.2 source in order to compile the C file
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration/
2005 Mar 24
0
[patch] small accounting and lockup fix for xenfreebsd on -unstable
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2005/03/23 18:27:49-08:00 kmacy@shemp.lab.netapp.com
# only bump tmpindex by NKPT-1 once
# release sched lock on upcall
# Signed-off-by: Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>
#
# freebsd-5.3-xen-sparse/i386-xen/i386-xen/machdep.c
# 2005/03/23 18:24:47-08:00 kmacy@shemp.lab.netapp.com +0 -4
# remove extra bump of
2005 Mar 02
24
unstable binaries
Hi *,
i am coming from UML, and now i evaluate Xen on my desktop:
Xen-2.0.4
linux-2.6.10
"CONFIG_MODULES is not set"
"CONFIG_AGP is not set"
"CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y"
FC3, [/usr]/lib/tls moved away
It works, but some desktop applications crash once in a
while within dom0:
metacity-2.8.6
firefox-1.0.1
wnck-applet (from gnome-panel-2.8.1)
But
2008 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] Tail-calling
You can skip this first and second paragraph if you just want to get
to the description, the 'real' question I want is the bottom most
paragraph and may still make enough sense to read without reading
everything else, but there are a few other hidden questions and
opinions being asked in the rest of it.
In this little scripting language I am making is basically going to be
a C with Actors
2016 Oct 13
5
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> As always it's best to first upgrade to the current version (3.1.3)
> if at all possible, as there's always the chance that the cause of
> your problems has already been fixed.
Good call, but I believe I may have ruled this out. I didn't upgrade to
3.1.3, but both sides are running 3.1.1 protocol version 31 now. Same