similar to: doMPI 0.1-3

I'd like to announce the availability of version 0.1-4 of the "doMPI" package, a parallel backend for the "foreach" package, which acts as an adaptor to the "Rmpi" package. The package has been uploaded to CRAN and is now available under the GPL-2 license. In addition to fixing a few problems in version 0.1-3, the main new feature of this release is the

I'd like to announce the availability of version 0.1-4 of the "doMPI" package, a parallel backend for the "foreach" package, which acts as an adaptor to the "Rmpi" package. The package has been uploaded to CRAN and is now available under the GPL-2 license. In addition to fixing a few problems in version 0.1-3, the main new feature of this release is the

??I installed Microsoft MPI. Then installed the foreach and Rmpi packages. Then built doMPI from source. mpi.remote.exec works. foreach hangs with the main process and all worker processes idle. I launch my script with mpiexec: "C:\Program Files\Microsoft MPI\Bin\mpiexec" -n 3 "C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.0\bin\x64\Rterm.exe" --no-save -q -f "MPI Test.r" The

Shouldn't -n be 4 in the bsub command? One master+3 slaves. This was required for snowfall, but I think doSNOW is similar. Hope it helps mario On 16-Dec-10 23:09, Marius Hofert wrote: > Dear expeRts, > > I try to get a minimal example for parallel computing via "foreach" + "doSNOW" to run on a computer cluster (Brutus from

Dear expeRts, This is a similar post as on R-SIG-MAC [I didn't receive an answer there; not sure if it was the right place to post either]. I'm running R version 2.12.1 (Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)) on a MacBook Pro under Mac OS X 10.6.6. The following minimal example runs fine under this setup. However, if I am connected to a server via a VPN client [Cisco

Dear expeRts, I struggle with the following problem using snow clusters for parallel computing: I would like to specify l'Ecuyer's random number generator. Base R creates a .Random.seed of length 7, the first value indicating the kind fo random number generator. I would thus like to use the components 2 to 7 as the seed for l'Ecuyer's random number generator. By doing so, I

Many thanks to Dr Yu for updating Rmpi for R 2.6.0, and for starting to make the changes to support Open MPI. I have just built the updated Debian package of Rmpi (i.e. r-cran-rmpi) under R 2.6.0 but I cannot convince myself yet whether it works or not. Simple tests work. E.g. on my Debian testing box, with Rmpi installed directly using Open Mpi 1.2.3-2 (from Debian) and using 'r' from

Hi I have managed to install MPICH2 and Rmpi on my Windows 7 machine. I can also run the following code > library(Rmpi) > mpi.spawn.Rslaves() 4 slaves are spawned successfully. 0 failed. master (rank 0, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave1 (rank 1, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave2 (rank 2, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave3

Hi I have managed to install MPICH2 and Rmpi on my Windows 7 machine. I can also run the following code > library(Rmpi) > mpi.spawn.Rslaves() 4 slaves are spawned successfully. 0 failed. master (rank 0, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave1 (rank 1, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave2 (rank 2, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave3 (rank 3, comm

Whas missing the R in the command line: "mpirun -n --hostfile /home/hostfile R --no-save -f rtest.R" Hope this helps mario On 13-Jan-11 22:08, Justin Moriarty wrote: > Hi, > Just wanted to share a working example of doSNOW and foreach for an openMPI cluster. The function eddcmp() is just an example and returns some inocuous warnings. The

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:00 PM Shian Su <su.s at wehi.edu.au> wrote: > > Thanks Simon, > > I will take note of the sensible default for core usage. I?m trying to achieve small scale parallelism, where tasks take 1-5 seconds and make fuller use of consumer hardware. Its not a HPC-worthy computation but even laptops these days come with 4 cores and I don?t see a reason to not make

Version 2.2.0 of package bcp is now available.? It replaces the suggests of NetWorkSpaces (previously used for optional parallel MCMC) with the dependency on package foreach, giving greater flexibility and supporting a wider range of parallel backends (see doSNOW, doMC, etc...). For those unfamiliar with foreach (thanks to Steve Weston for this contribution), it's a beautiful and highly

Version 2.2.0 of package bcp is now available.? It replaces the suggests of NetWorkSpaces (previously used for optional parallel MCMC) with the dependency on package foreach, giving greater flexibility and supporting a wider range of parallel backends (see doSNOW, doMC, etc...). For those unfamiliar with foreach (thanks to Steve Weston for this contribution), it's a beautiful and highly

Version 2.2.0 of package bcp is now available. It replaces the suggests of NetWorkSpaces (previously used for optional parallel MCMC) with the dependency on package foreach, giving greater flexibility and supporting a wider range of parallel backends (see doSNOW, doMC, etc...). For those unfamiliar with foreach (thanks to Steve Weston for this contribution), it's a beautiful and highly

Version 2.2.0 of package bcp is now available. It replaces the suggests of NetWorkSpaces (previously used for optional parallel MCMC) with the dependency on package foreach, giving greater flexibility and supporting a wider range of parallel backends (see doSNOW, doMC, etc...). For those unfamiliar with foreach (thanks to Steve Weston for this contribution), it's a beautiful and highly

The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. It incorporates (slightly revised) copies of packages \CRANpkg{multicore} and \CRANpkg{snow} (excluding MPI, PVM and NWS clusters). Code written to use the higher-level API functions in those packages should

hello all i am busy testing some code that will be used for parallel computations on a Moab cluster. I have written a C++ program and am linking it with R using the .C command - this works correctly. Extracts of the r code (as well as the *.sh file) is included below. I am able to run the code successfully if I remove all of the doMPI commands. i.e. outs=.C("prog1", all of the

Oh, I completely missed that one. It's very neat as it seems to work both on Windows and Unix. Thanks! Xavier On 10/02/15 10:52, Martyn Plummer wrote: > The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is > distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes > > \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. > > It incorporates (slightly

Dear R People: I'm having some trouble with mpiexec and Rmpi. I would like to be able to pass in the number of "children" via the mpiexec command (from the command line). this is in SUSE10.1, with R-2.7.1 Here are my files: cat eb.R library(Rmpi) mpi.remote.exec(paste("i am",mpi.comm.rank(),"of",mpi.comm.size())) mpi.quit() hodgesse at

Thank you very much Steve. Your suggestion works perfectly -- at least with doSEQ, doMC and doMPI. Bests, Renaud On 28/06/2011 15:35, Stephen Weston wrote: > I think that the result of the concatenation should be a call object, > rather than an expression object. How about something along the > lines of: > > '%dopar2%'<- function(obj, ex) { > ex<-