similar to: package ltm -- version 0.6-0

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the new version of package 'ltm' for Item Response Theory analysis. The function grm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting the Graded Response Model for ordinal polytomous manifest variables. An extra feature of the plot method for classes 'grm', 'ltm' and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the new version of package 'ltm' for Item Response Theory analysis. The function grm() (along with supporting methods, i.e., anova, margins, factor.scores, etc.) has been added for fitting the Graded Response Model for ordinal polytomous manifest variables. An extra feature of the plot method for classes 'grm', 'ltm' and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package `ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.8-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under IRT, including the Rasch model, the Two-Parameter Logistic model, Birnbaum's Three-Parameter model, the Latent Trait model

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package `ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.8-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under IRT, including the Rasch model, the Two-Parameter Logistic model, Birnbaum's Three-Parameter model, the Latent Trait model

Hi Xavier, the reason you observe this feature is that in the 'constraint' argument you should specify the values under the additive parameterization, i.e., when in the second column of the matrix supplied in 'constraint' you specify 2, then you need to provide the easiness parameters (not the difficulty parameters) in the third column. Check the Details section of ?tpm() and

Dear R users, I'd like to announce the new version of the package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch and two-parameter logistic models) under the Item Response Theory approach. Three main extra features have been added: (i) now both ltm() and rasch() permit general fixed-value constraints (e.g., useful for scaling purposes), (ii)

Dear R users, I'd like to announce the new version of the package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch and two-parameter logistic models) under the Item Response Theory approach. Three main extra features have been added: (i) now both ltm() and rasch() permit general fixed-value constraints (e.g., useful for scaling purposes), (ii)

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.9-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under various IRT models. Furthermore, supporting functions for descriptive statistics, goodness-of-fit, ability estimation and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package 'ltm' (i.e., ltm_0.9-0 soon available from CRAN) for Item Response Theory analyses. This package provides a flexible framework for analyzing dichotomous and polytomous data under various IRT models. Furthermore, supporting functions for descriptive statistics, goodness-of-fit, ability estimation and

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of my new package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch model) under the Item Response Theory approach. The latent trait model is the analogous of the factor analysis model for Bernoulli response data. "ltm" fits the linear one- and two-factor models but also allows for

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of my new package "ltm" (available from CRAN), for fitting Latent Trait Models (including the Rasch model) under the Item Response Theory approach. The latent trait model is the analogous of the factor analysis model for Bernoulli response data. "ltm" fits the linear one- and two-factor models but also allows for

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new package JM (JM_0.1-0 available from CRAN) for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data. The package has a single model-fitting function called jointModel(), which accepts as main arguments a linear mixed effects object fit returned by function lme() of package nlme, and a survival object fit returned by either

Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new package JM (JM_0.1-0 available from CRAN) for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data. The package has a single model-fitting function called jointModel(), which accepts as main arguments a linear mixed effects object fit returned by function lme() of package nlme, and a survival object fit returned by either

Dear R-users, We'd like to announce the release of our new package "grouped" (available from CRAN), for fitting models for grouped or coarse data, under the Coarsened At Random assumption. This is useful in cases where the true response variable is known only up to an interval in which it lies. Features of the package include: power calculations for two-group comparisons,

Dear R-users, We'd like to announce the release of our new package "grouped" (available from CRAN), for fitting models for grouped or coarse data, under the Coarsened At Random assumption. This is useful in cases where the true response variable is known only up to an interval in which it lies. Features of the package include: power calculations for two-group comparisons,

Thanks for the help Dimitris, However I still have a question, this time I'll be more specific, the following is my SAS code proc mixed data=Reg; class ID; model y=Time Time*x1 Time*x2 Time*x3 /S; random intercept Time /S type=UN subject=ID G GCORR V; repeated /subject = ID R RCORR; run; ** (Type =UN for random effects) The eqivalent lme statement I

Dear R-users, I have noticed small discrepencies in the reported estimate of the variance of the frailty by the print method for survreg() and the 'theta' component included in the object fit: # Examples in R-2.6.2 for Windows library(survival) # version 2.34-1 (2008-03-31) # discrepancy fit1 <- survreg(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + frailty(litter), rats) fit1 fit1$history[[1]]$theta

Dear all, I would like to Boostrap the stepAIC() procedure from package MASS for variety of model objects, i.e., fn <- function(object, data, B = 2){ n <- nrow(data) res <- vector(mode = "list", length = B) index <- sample(n, n * B, replace = TRUE) dim(index) <- c(n, B) for (i in 1:B) { up.obj <- update(object, data = data[index[, i], ])

Hi Dimitris: Thanks for your help, I will try. BR Yiyao -----ԭʼÓʼþ----- ·¢¼þÈË: Dimitris Rizopoulos [mailto:dimitris.rizopoulos at med.kuleuven.ac. be] ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2004Äê10ÔÂ25ÈÕ 15:39 ÊÕ¼þÈË: YiYao_Jiang ³­ËÍ: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [R] Multiple formula in one block Hi YiYao, you need the `?panel.abline()' function, somehing like: panel=function(x, breaks,

Dear R-devels, I'd like to create a plot method for a class of objects that passes the '...' argument to both plot() and legend(), e.g., x <- list(data = rnorm(1000)) class(x) <- "foo" plot.foo <- function(x, legend = FALSE, cx = "topright", cy = NULL, ...){ dx <- sort(x$data) plot(dx, dnorm(dx), type = "l", ...) if (legend)