similar to: Why can zfs receive an incremental stream?

Here''s something that might of interest to Mac aficionados: http://tenscomplement.com/z-410-storage-main-features -- Maurice Volaski, maurice.volaski at einstein.yu.edu Computing Support, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Apologies up front for failing to find related posts... Am I overlooking a way to get ''zfs send -i fs at 0 fs at 1 | zfs receive -n -v ...'' to show the contents of the stream? I''m looking for the equivalent of ufsdump 1f - fs ... | ufsrestore tv - . I''m hoping that this might be a faster way than using ''find fs -newer ...'' to learn

I''ve been experimenting with a two system setup in snv_134 where each system exports a zvol via COMSTAR iSCSI. One system imports both its own zvol and the one from the other system and puts them together in a ZFS mirror. I manually faulted the zvol on one system by physically removing some drives. What I expect to happen is that ZFS will fault the zvol pool and the iSCSI stack will

Folks, >From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs. Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev? Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Peter -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Lets say I have two servers, both running opensolaris with ZFS. I basically want to be able to create a filesystem where the two servers have a common volume, that is mirrored between the two. Meaning, each server keeps an identical, real time backup of the other''s data directory. Set them both up as file servers, and load balance between the two for incoming requests. How would anyone

Oracle have deleted the best ZFS platform I know, the X4540. Does anyone know of an equivalent system? None of the current Oracle/Sun offerings come close. -- Ian.

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

Dual Opteron system running ext3 atop drbd (network RAID) devices, which, in turn, are atop LVM logical volumes. The underlying device is hardware SCSI RAID via a LSILogic HBA. The kernel is vanilla 2.6.13 on a Gentoo-based system. A panic occurred, which contains references to ext3 code. I'm not sure how others manage to get these typed out, but I'm manually typing it from

Hi everyone, Please review the information below regarding access to ZFS version information. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Cindy CR 6898657: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6898657 ZFS commands zpool upgrade -v and zfs upgrade -v refer to URLs that are no longer redirected to the correct location after April 30, 2010. Description The

If I login to our Samba box (RedHat 7.1 + 2.4.20) under Windows 2K via Start->Run->share name, I get logged in almost immediately. It averages about 25 seconds under XP. This behavior has been true in various versions of Samba since I believe XP was available and is reproducible on every (several) Windows 2K/XP boxes I have tried. This is a workgroup environment with Samba acting as

I have passwords stored in passdb.tdb by smbpasswd in Solaris Express 11. For existing accounts, all passwords, including those more than 8 characters, work. However, when I created a new account and assigned it a password greater than 8 characters, I am unable to login from Mac OS X 10.6.8 and Windows Server 2008. The smbclient on the Solaris server still works. Passwords 8 characters or fewer

I created a filesystem as follows: mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6 Here's the the output from df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% /dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1% It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total disk size, for itself. Is that right? If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being

This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? * Starting UPS drivers... Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1) Detected GXT2-2000RT120 on host upswallleft (mib: ietf 1.3) [upswallleft] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.0: Error in

I need to get around the requirement of --exclude=* to have all the parent directories of the files and directories that are to be included. So given the file.. /startdirectory/subdirectory1/subdirectory2/filetobecopied I need to include / /subdirectory1 /subdirectory1/subdirectory2 I could just include the entire directory structure , but alternatively just include the needed paths. So the

Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same. Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's

Hey folks, I have no knowledge at all about how streams work in Solaris, so this might have a simple answer, or be completely impossible. Unfortunately I''m a windows admin so haven''t a clue which :) We''re looking at rolling out a couple of ZFS servers on our network, and instead of tapes we''re considering using off-site NAS boxes for backups. We think

According to various posts the LSI SAS3081E-R seems to work well with OpenSolaris. But I''ve got pretty chilled-out from my recent problems with Areca-1680''s. Could anyone please confirm that the LSI SAS3081E-R works well ? Is hotplug supported ? Anything else I should know before buying one of these cards ? Thanks, Arnaud

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2033 Summary: ''zfs create'' causes panic if key file doesn''t exist Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

I have two Opteron-based Tyan systems being supported by PCI-e Areca cards. There is definitely an issue going on in the two systems that is causing significantly degraded performance of these cards. It appeared, initially, that the SATA backplane on the Tyan chassis was wholly to blame. But then I made an odd discovery. I'm running from the Ubuntu LiveCD for 64-bit. It uses kernel

> From: zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of bob netherton > > You can, with recv, override any property in the sending stream that can > be > set from the command line (ie, a writable). > > # zfs send repo/support at cpu-0412 | zfs recv -o version=4 repo/test > cannot receive: cannot override received