Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "multipl disk failures cause zpool hang"
2006 Aug 01
9
DNS resolutions is not working in a Solaris 10 DomU
Hi,
I found a problem with the DNS resolution in a Solaris 10 DomU.
The Test Environment was:
I installed the Xen bfu on top of Solaris snv43 and booted the Dom0 with
Solaris. Then I installed and booted a Solaris 10 DomU.
In the Solaris 10 Dom0 the DNS resolution works; in the Solaris 10 DomU
the DNS resolution does not work as expected:
Inside the Solaris 10 DomU I can''t use
2004 Jan 29
10
Back to 3.0.1, Winbind and Solaris 9
I've gone back to 3.0.1 to try and get winbind to work with my Solaris 9
machine and NT4 domain. Everything works except user authentication. The
wbinfo and getent commands do what they are supposed to.
I've included a truss of 'su - ganguly'
According to pamlog, the user 'ganguly' has been granted access but it is
still hanging.
How do I do a truss of a telnet login?
2007 Jan 05
0
troubles with telnet sessions under Solaris8 as AD member with winbind V3.0.23d
Hi guys,
I've a problem with telnet sessions under Solaris 8 with samba 3.0.23d
winbind.
If I have the winbind authorization active for telnet in my pam.conf I got
a kick out of the system after exactly 300 sec, no mather if I do or do
not activity on the telnet session. The same behavior is for AD and for
local users.
I've trussed a telnet session a the only thing I see is that my
2002 Nov 10
2
Trying to join a Solaris 8 box to Windows 2000 AD.
I am having major problems with SAMBA samba-3.0alpha20 in trying to connect
to
Windows 2000 AD. I have attached info if that helps. Any help you can give
me
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Clive Elsum
I can get samba-3.0alpha20 working if I include reference to our NT PDC
in the smb.conf file and do a net rpc join command.
This joins our NT PDC domain which has a trust
2003 Oct 23
1
pam_smbpass on Solaris box
Hello
I decided to test password migration (on Solaris 8 box with SUNWspro C) and built samba with pam_smbpass module :
CC=cc ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/samba --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
Then installed bin/pam_smbpass.so in /usr/lib/security :
# ls -al /usr/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 2091380 Oct 23 11:01
2006 Oct 31
0
On Solaris8 install samba show error: libsendfile.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
samba everyone:
How do you do!
I have a question about install samba on solaris8.I search internet a lot.but don't find useful info. wish can get work it out there.Hope any advices and tips.Thanks lot.
OS: solaris8
I have installed follow softeware:
gcc-3.3.2-sol8-sparc-local.gz
libiconv-1.9.2-sol8-sparc-local.gz
ncurses-5.4-sol8-sparc-local.gz
2004 Feb 24
4
Pam trouble
Hi folks,
I can't get dovecot to authenticate properly against ldap/pam.
I've been fiddling with it for several days now, to no avail. It keeps crashing
with:
Child died with signal 11
The system is Solaris9. Enclosed is a trace of dovecot-auth for a connection to
pop with correct username and password and my config.
Any help is appreciated.
Cheers
Benjamin
2010 Jul 21
3
smbd -D hangs
I'm testing both sunfreeware and official sun (sfw) samba on Solaris
10. For some reason since yesterday, the smbd process just "hangs" at
the start.
No log is generated on server side
Where smbd is started, I can't find any open port on 139 or 145
My OS is Solaris 10
# uname -a
SunOS labo2 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120
#
2005 Jul 22
0
winbbind not quiried by nsswitch on solaris 8
Afternoon to all,
I am having the following problem for 3 days now and am starting to bang
head against wall :)
Here is the setup : Solaris 8 box running Samba 3.0.4 server member in
an NT 4 style domain
I have managed to get it to join the domain and if I create a
corresponding account on the sunbox (without password) users are able to
log into shares with appropriate passwords and other
2008 Dec 17
10
Cannot remove a file on a GOOD ZFS filesystem
Hello all,
First off, i''m talking about a SXDE build 89. Sorry if that was discussed here before, but i did not find anything related on the archives, and i think is a "weird" issue...
If i try to remove a specific file, i got:
# rm file1
rm: file1: No such file or directory
# rm -rf dir2
rm: Unable to remove directory dir2: Directory not empty
Take a look:
------- cut
2009 Oct 25
21
zfs inotify?
OK, so this may be a little off-topic, but here goes:
The reason I switched to OpenSolaris was primarily to take advantage of ZFS''s
features when storing my digital imaging collection.
I switched from a pretty stock Linux setup, but it left me at one
disadvantage. I had been using inotify under Linux to trigger a series of Ruby
scripts that would do all the basic ingestion/setup for
2006 Oct 13
3
error running webserver 7 with the DTrace dvm agents...
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#330000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tt><font size="+1">I am attempting to run the sun webserver 7
2010 Aug 13
15
NFS issue with ZFS
I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem.
The client is Solaris 9 U7.
I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it.
showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone.
the dfstab file has option rw set.
So what gives?
Phillip
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2008 Oct 09
0
"zfs set sharenfs" takes a long time to return.
I have an X4500 fileserver (NFS, Samba) running OpenSolaris 2008.05 pkg upgraded to snv_91 with ~3200 filesystems (and ~27429 datasets, including snapshots).
I''ve been encountering some pretty big slow-downs on this system when running certain zfs commands. The one causing me the most pain at the moment is setting the "sharenfs" property on a filesystem takes a little under 7
2013 Nov 18
0
[PATCH net] bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridge
The calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode
[ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state
[ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects
[ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O
2006 Oct 31
0
6288365 memcntl panics on debug sun4v kernels for 4M pages
Author: mec
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: 5065f157eeb35c3606db725b96ddfd3ba091ddf1
Log message:
6288365 memcntl panics on debug sun4v kernels for 4M pages
Files:
update: usr/src/uts/common/syscall/memcntl.c
update: usr/src/uts/common/vm/page.h
update: usr/src/uts/common/vm/vm_pagelist.c
2020 Jul 16
0
[RFC for qemu v4 2/2] virtio_balloon: Add dcvq to deflate continuous pages
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:41:55AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> This commit adds a vq dcvq to deflate continuous pages.
> When VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CONT_PAGES is set, try to get continuous pages
> from icvq and use madvise MADV_WILLNEED with the pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <teawaterz at linux.alibaba.com>
This is arguably something to benchmark. Does guest benefit
from
2005 Nov 25
28
ZFS and memcntl(..., MC_SYNC, ...)
It wouldn''t be proper to start my first post here without congratulations
and thanks to the ZFS team for such an impressive piece of work.
Anyway, on to my query. I''ve been trying out ZFS, with a particular focus in
reducing latency in a specific application. This application has a fair
amount of random writing going on in the background (which, of course, ZFS
will make
2013 Nov 18
0
bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridge
The calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode
[ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state
[ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects
[ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O
2004 Dec 28
1
OpenSSH 3.9p1 X11 forwarding
Hi,
We upgraded from 3.7.1p2 to 3.9p1. The behaviour of the X11 forwarding
changed significantly, it is much slower. See below the truss output
(server side which runs 3.7.1p2) an check for the timestamp (6 seconds
delay). Do you have any idea what may causes this behaviour? Platform is
Solaris 5.9 Generic_117171-05.
Thanks in advance,
Andy Kocher
19279: 9.5463 sigaction(SIGCLD,