similar to: Any limit on pool hierarchy?

Oracle have deleted the best ZFS platform I know, the X4540. Does anyone know of an equivalent system? None of the current Oracle/Sun offerings come close. -- Ian.

Hi ! I upgraded to 3.6.0 on my Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit and since change to max protocol=SMB2 and nmbd/smbd restarts I get many of those "NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE" messages /------------------------------------- [2011/08/09 15:55:11.130751, 1] smbd/process.c:456(receive_smb_talloc) read_smb_length_return_keepalive failed for client 192.168.1.109 read error = NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE.

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

Here''s something that might of interest to Mac aficionados: http://tenscomplement.com/z-410-storage-main-features -- Maurice Volaski, maurice.volaski at einstein.yu.edu Computing Support, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I created a filesystem as follows: mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6 Here's the the output from df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% /dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1% It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total disk size, for itself. Is that right? If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being

This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? * Starting UPS drivers... Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1) Detected GXT2-2000RT120 on host upswallleft (mib: ietf 1.3) [upswallleft] nut_snmp_get: 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.0: Error in

I need to get around the requirement of --exclude=* to have all the parent directories of the files and directories that are to be included. So given the file.. /startdirectory/subdirectory1/subdirectory2/filetobecopied I need to include / /subdirectory1 /subdirectory1/subdirectory2 I could just include the entire directory structure , but alternatively just include the needed paths. So the

I''ve been experimenting with a two system setup in snv_134 where each system exports a zvol via COMSTAR iSCSI. One system imports both its own zvol and the one from the other system and puts them together in a ZFS mirror. I manually faulted the zvol on one system by physically removing some drives. What I expect to happen is that ZFS will fault the zvol pool and the iSCSI stack will

Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) > to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script > runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh > session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able > to connect again. Even restarting

Dual Opteron system running ext3 atop drbd (network RAID) devices, which, in turn, are atop LVM logical volumes. The underlying device is hardware SCSI RAID via a LSILogic HBA. The kernel is vanilla 2.6.13 on a Gentoo-based system. A panic occurred, which contains references to ext3 code. I'm not sure how others manage to get these typed out, but I'm manually typing it from

I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able to connect again. Even restarting sshd doesn?t help. Rsync has apparently killed it. I have to reboot. -------------- next part

Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from this computer. Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. I'm copying to a CIFS share mounted on the Gentoo computer. The rsync scripts are all similar to this one: /usr/bin/rsync -v -a

Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote: > Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have > a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from > this computer. > > Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, > which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. > > I'm copying to a CIFS

If I login to our Samba box (RedHat 7.1 + 2.4.20) under Windows 2K via Start->Run->share name, I get logged in almost immediately. It averages about 25 seconds under XP. This behavior has been true in various versions of Samba since I believe XP was available and is reproducible on every (several) Windows 2K/XP boxes I have tried. This is a workgroup environment with Samba acting as

Lets say I have two servers, both running opensolaris with ZFS. I basically want to be able to create a filesystem where the two servers have a common volume, that is mirrored between the two. Meaning, each server keeps an identical, real time backup of the other''s data directory. Set them both up as file servers, and load balance between the two for incoming requests. How would anyone

I have two Opteron-based Tyan systems being supported by PCI-e Areca cards. There is definitely an issue going on in the two systems that is causing significantly degraded performance of these cards. It appeared, initially, that the SATA backplane on the Tyan chassis was wholly to blame. But then I made an odd discovery. I'm running from the Ubuntu LiveCD for 64-bit. It uses kernel

Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same. Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's

Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page at http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html >You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the >filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated >to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it

I have had in years past seen hardware (SCSI) RAID controllers lose it electronically causing the kernel to fill the logs with scary SCSI messages and ext3 to complain about "holes" in the filesystem like so: Sep 7 14:47:17 thewarehouse1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,81)): ext3_readdir: directory #376833 contains a hole at offset 0 I'm using drbd and heartbeat so whatever

>Yes, if you are creating larger files. By default e2fsck assumes the average >file size is 8kB and allocates a corresponding number of inodes there. If, >for example, you are storing lots of larger files there (digital photos, MP3s, >etc) that are in the MB range you can use "-t largefile" or "-t largefile4" >to specify an average file size of 1MB or 4MB