similar to: AMD/Supermicro machine - AS-2022G-URF

Hi all I am fairly new to samba and XP. I have a client who we set up a samba server for, they are complaining about documents taking about 30 secs -2-3mins to open but only sometimes (it can be very frequent). I have seen this and captured a piece of the log file I wonder if any one can make any sense of it... I have been looking on the net and trying various things all day but to no avail...

Hi - I''m trying to create an iscsi targe and go thru the motions of making the following LUN''s available - I am not able to run the command: itadm create-target as I get the following error: bash: itadm: command not found I need to get the following dirve seen by vmware 0. c7t0d0 <Areca-ARC-1260-VOL#00-R001-279.40GB> /pci at 0,0/pci8086,29f1 at 1/pci8086,370 at

I have the same question that Eusebio had: Is there a function similar to "sink" that redirect also R code to a file that is: sink("R001") x <- c(2,-6,-4,8,5,4,1,3,4,-9,0,1) A <- matrix(x, ncol=3) A A.prima <- t(A) A.prima dim(A) dim(A.prima) sink() create a file "R001" with contents: ------------------------------------------ [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,]

Previously the packages were built 6 Dec 2022 published 13 Dec 2022. Now the download packages are rebuilt 30 Mar 2023 published 03 Apr 2023. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/tzdata-2022g-1.el7.noarch.rpm http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/tzdata-java-2022g-1.el7.noarch.rpm Why would a previously published package be re-published with different

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 1c6f93977947dbba1fc4d250c4eb8a7d4cfdecf1 Add linux-next specific files for 20230704 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306260401.qZlYQpV2-lkp at intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306301709.lvrxzyCj-lkp at intel.com

In my new oracle server, sol11exp, it''s using multipath device names... Presently I have two disks attached: (I removed the other 10 disks for now, because these device names are so confusing. This way I can focus on *just* the OS disks.) 0. c0t5000C5003424396Bd0 <SEAGATE-ST32000SSSUN2.0-0514 cyl 3260 alt 2 hd 255 sec 252> /scsi_vhci/disk at g5000c5003424396b

Greetings! I''m testing raid6, and recently added two drives. I haven''t been able to properly resume a balance operation: the number of total chunks is always too low. It seems that the balance starts and pauses properly, but always resumes with ~7 chunks. Here''s an example: vendikar tim # uname -r 3.10.0-031000rc4-generic vendikar tim # btrfs fi sho Label:

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: a734662572708cf062e974f659ae50c24fc1ad17 Add linux-next specific files for 20230801 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307251531.p8ZLFTMZ-lkp at intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308020154.Xrcb9bWT-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently

<cc'ing llvmdev, please don't email me directly> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Christophe Avoinne wrote: > On 23/05/2007 22:05:48, Chris Lattner (sabre at nondot.org) wrote: > > LLVM 2.0 is done! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ or view > > the release notes: http://llvm.org/releases/2.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > > > Hello Chris. > > Your

On Thu, May 28, 2020 19:38, Robert Nichols wrote: > What output do you get from: > > file -s /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log > lsblk -f /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log > file -s /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log: symbolic link TO '../DM-5' dm-f lsblk -f /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_log NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID

Would anyone have any ideas with smbclient sits at FUTEX_WAIT in below message? Typing: strace smbclient -d 5 shows it sitting at: futex(0x2aaaabdf2dc0, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NU. SUSE 9.3 x86_64, Samba RPMS from main Samba site rpm -q samba-client samba-client-3.0.23a-0.1.34 -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E

Hi all, I have two multi-disk btrfs filesystems on a Arch linux 3.4.0 system. After a power failure, both filesystems refuse to mount [ 10.402284] Btrfs loaded [ 10.402714] device fsid 1e7c18a4-02d6-44b1-8eaf-c01378009cd3 devid 4 transid 65282 /dev/sdc [ 10.403108] btrfs: force zlib compression [ 10.403130] btrfs: enabling inode map caching [ 10.403152] btrfs: disk space caching is

Hi all, I have a question about replacing a drive in raid10 (and linux kernel 3.8.4). A bad disk was physical removed from the server. After this a new disk was added with "btrfs device add /dev/sdg /btrfs" to the raid10 btrfs FS. After this the server was rebooted and I mounted the filesystem in degraded mode. It seems that a previous started balance continued. At this point I want to

Hi, I have added 2x2Tb to my existing 2x2Tb raid 1 btrfs filesystem and then ran a balance: # btrfs filesystem show Total devices 4 FS bytes used 1.74TB devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdd devid 4 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sde devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdb # btrfs

Hi, Some time back I had written to the list about integrating Cisco ISE and facing errors with RPC login. When we actually integrated using ISE 2.4.0357 we noticed that Kerberos authentication is working like a charm. But MS-RPC authentication throws error. From the samba logs, we noticed that ISE workstation is able to negotiate the RPC ports switch to higher Dynamic RPC ports,

Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 offline or reservation conflict Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g60001fe100118db00009119074440055 (sd82): Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 i/o to invalid geometry Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g60001fe100118db00009119074440055 (sd82): Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144

I''m seeing seriously degraded performance with round-robin SAS multipathing. I''m hoping you guys can help me achieve full throughput across both paths. My System Config: OpenSolaris snv_134 2 x E5520 2.4 GHz Xeon Quad-Core Processors 48 GB RAM 2 x LSI SAS 9200-8e (eight-port external 6Gb/s SATA and SAS PCIe 2.0 HBA) 1 X Mellanox 40 Gb/s dual port card PCIe 2.0 1 x JBOD:

I''ve installed Open Solaris 2009.06 on a machine with 5 identical 1TB wd green drives to create a ZFS nas. The intended install is one drive dedicated to the OS and the remaining 4 drives in a raidz1 configuration. The install is working fine, but creating the raidz1 pool and rebooting is causing the machine report "Cannot find active partition" upon reboot. Below is command

Hi! I tried to add an other FiweFire Drive to my existing four devices but it turned out, that the OpenSolaris IEEE1394 support doen''t seem to be well-engineered. After not recognizing the new device and exporting and importing the existing zpool, I get this zpool status: pool: tank state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or

Hi, I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3 HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched) (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/) SANOS1:/media # uname -a Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now /dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10) SANOS1:/media #