similar to: rescue action doesn''t catch exception

I''m having trouble with rescue_action_in_public, both in getting it to work right in my rails app, and in writing tests to make sure. What I ultimately want to do is test for what a normal user would see when an error is trapped. I override local_request? like so: application.rb -------------- def rescue_action_in_public(exception) render :text => "oops" end def

Greetings, I''m trying to catch all un-handled exceptions. I''m having problems handling the RoutingError and UnknownAction exceptions. I''ve added the following to my application controller as a protected method: def rescue_action(exception) render(:text => "error") end As far as I understand, this should catch all uncaught exceptions and override

Hi, I''m having a strange problem that only seems to be happening on our production server. I never get this error locally but get it quite often on the server. The other odd thing is it doesn''t seem to be resulting in any error pages on the site. Everything looks fine... I wanted to add a rescue_action_in_public to email me when there are errors. So I followed the

All, Rails 1.1.6 Ruby 1.8.6 Win XP It appears that none of my rescue_action_* methods, if defined in my application.rb file, are being called. I''ve placed debug statements inside of the ActionController Rescue module to verify that rescue_action is being called. Here are my overrides in application.rb, none of which are being called - they are all protected visibility (these are just

I''d like to be able to catch ActionController::MissingTemplate exceptions from within ActionControlle, *but*, MissingTemplate isn''t defined within my controllers!!! How is that possible - after all, all controller subclass ActionController, so how are exceptions it defines not there!? More importantly, how can I do this? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 6/19/2012 7:14 AM, SHIVA PRASAD wrote: > Dear LLVM Members, > > The below source code from gcc test suite replicates the > problem which i am facing. When it is built with clang, it throws an > abort(highlighted). > The following are my observations - > > 1. The object(tmp) is not getting destroyed immediately after the > exception is thrown. In case of

Dear LLVM Members, The below source code from gcc test suite replicates the problem which i am facing. When it is built with clang, it throws an abort (highlighted). The following are my observations - 1. The object(tmp) is not getting destroyed immediately after the exception is thrown. In case of Clang, the object is getting destroyed at a later point of time. 2. In case of gcc, the

Heyho, I start to discover RSpec but it seems that just on my second day I ran into some strange trouble with the rescue_action of my controllers. Just like in Rails 2.0 where there is a rescue_from Exception, :with => :foo_method thing to rescue exception thrown in actions in the production environment, I did a little helper that rescues my action exceptions with a defined class. For

As I am in development environment, I wrote in my config/environment.rb ActionController::Base.consider_all_requests_local = false in my application.rb, I wrote def rescue_action_in_public(exception) case exception when RoutingError, UnknownAction render :file => "#{RAILS_ROOT}/public/404.html", :status => 404 else logger.error

Hello, When I call an action with some invalid XML or JSON data a parse exception gets raised from within Rails/Ruby (REXML or ActiveSupport::JSON). The problem that I''ve got is how to handle these exceptions. In my application_controller.rb I have the following for debugging purposes: def rescue_action_in_public(exception) respond_to do |request| request.all { render :text =>

I''m using the rescue_action_in_public example from the Agile book to handle errors and email serious ones to me. In my application.rb controller: def rescue_action_in_public(exception) logger.error("rescue_action_in_public executed") case exception when ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound, ActionController::RoutingError, ActionController::UnknownAction

hi, i''m trying to implement rescue_action_in_public as a catch-all to redirect to an error page when an exception is thrown (actually, just for testing, I''m rendering "ERROR"). However, putting def render_action_in_public render( :text=>"ERROR" ) end in either a specific controller or even application.rb, has no effect on the app redirecting on

All, I am using Net::HTTP to make requests for URLs in my app. When I get a bad server, I get "Bad file descriptor - connect(2)" message on a ERRNO:EBADF error. Can I catch with rescue or otherwise gracefully react to that error? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, Sometime, I get the following error in my application: ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken in ManageController#site_servers ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken I tried to put the code in manage controller between begin ... rescue ... end but it didn''t catch the error. So I tried in the application.rb controller, I put the forgery code between begin ... rescue ...

Is there an agreed upon method for handling exceptions thrown by something outside of Merb? For example, DataMapper now throws a DataMapper::ObjectNotFoundError when a record isn''t found in the db. I''d like to catch these exceptions and raise a C:E:NotFound exception instead, but without having to wrap a lot of code in begin/rescue/end blocks. Thanks, Mike Irwin

I have a rails app that is run exclusively as a script/runner process, and I''d like to be able to catch all errors that occur in these processes in a standardized way. With a normal rails app, one can override rescue_action_in_public in ApplicationController, but I''m only using models. Is there something similar I can do? Any help is much appreciated.

In 2.3, exceptions raised by controllers under functional tests were by default propagated to the test, but by using rescue_action_in_public! a test could trigger the production, public behavior and then use assert_response or similar to test the expected result. This was implemented via coordination between ActionController::Rescue and ActionController::TestCase::RaiseActionExceptions. This

Sorry Peter, just saw this. If you are still having the problem: Did you set: llvm::JITExceptionHandling = true; ? Garrison On Jul 12, 2011, at 19:25, Peter Zion wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to catch an exception that is "passed through" an LLVM ExecutionEngine but I am unable to do so. Specifically, in C++ code, inside a try/catch block, I call a JITted function,

On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Let's take your example. You will have code that looks like this: > > extern "C" void thunk_item_M_delete( void *v_that ) { > item *that = 0; > try { > that = static_cast<item*>( v_that ); > that->~item(); > } catch (...) { > that->~item(); > } > } No I

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:25:16PM -0400, Peter Zion said > Hi All, > > I'm trying to catch an exception that is "passed through" an LLVM ExecutionEngine but I am unable to do so. Specifically, in C++ code, inside a try/catch block, I call a JITted function, which in turn calls back into my code. Everything works fine unless an exception is thrown; I would except the