similar to: Are recursive snapshot destroy and rename atomic too?

Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including snapshot/rollback integrated with customer''s application? Thanks, Cherry

Hi. I thought I''d take a stab at the first steps of porting ZFS to Darwin. I realize there are rumors that Apple is already doing this, but my contact at Apple has yet to get back to me to verify this. In the meantime, I wanted to see how hard it would be. I started with libzfs, and promptly ran into issues with libnvpair. It wants sys/nvpair.h, but I can''t find that in the

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=631 Summary: zpool get with no pool name dumps core in zfs-crypto Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: other AssignedTo:

Anthony Scarpino wrote (elsewhere): > While writing up the man page.. I thought of a few things that I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can

Anthony Scarpino wrote (elsewhere): > While writing up the man page.. I thought of a few things that I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can

I have an Ultra 10 client running Sol10 U3 that has a zfs pool set up on the extra space of the internal ide disk. There''s just the one fs and it is shared with the sharenfs property. When this system reboots nfs/server ends up getting disabled and this is the error from the SMF logs: [ Apr 16 08:41:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/nfs-server start") ] [ Apr 16

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=782 Summary: zfs keysource=raw fails with keyscope=dataset when file doesn''t exist Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4

Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick: > Log message: > PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties > 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html Via c0t0d0s0.org.

Hi: I am very interested in the ZFS deduplication, where can I get the the source code? Or would anybody send me an actual source code achive which contains the ZFS deduplication? I am looking forward your kind help. Thanks very much. Best Rgards -- Yujuan Tan, PhD Candidate Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, China Key Lab of Information Storage, Ministry of Education,

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2114 Summary: delegation_004: a non-root user can''t do ''zfs key -c'' with keychange delegated Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal

i need to get inodeno on ZFS and i am not able to find how to find it in kernel at vfs layer. i have vnode pointer and i am doing VTOZ to get znode but printing z_id from znode pointer gives me deadbeef(unitialized) , can somebody point me how to get that? i looked at zfs_getattr code and it does similar thing which i am doing but its able to get me inode no in getattribute structure(node

Hello, I want to setup an opensolaris for centralized storage server, using ZFS as the underlying FS, on a RAID 10 SATA disks. I will export the storage blocks using ISCSI to RHEL 5 (less than 10 clients, and I will format the partition as EXT3) I want to ask... 1. Is this setup suitable for mission critical use now? 2. Can I use LVM with this setup? Currently we are using NFS as the

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2033 Summary: ''zfs create'' causes panic if key file doesn''t exist Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hi All ; What is the status of ZFS on linux and what are the kernel''s supported? Regards Mertol <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email <mailto:Ayca.Yalcin at Sun.COM> mertol.ozyoney at

Hi, Is it expected that if I have filesystem tank/foo and tank/foo/bar (mounted under /tank) then in order to be able to browse via /net down into tank/foo/bar I need to have group/other permissions on /tank/foo open? # zfs create tank/foo # zfs create tank/foo/bar # chown gavinm /tank/foo /tank/foo/bar # zfs set sharenfs=rw tank/foo # ls -laR /tank/foo /tank/foo: total 9 drwxr-xr-x 3 gavinm

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1986 Summary: ''zfs destroy'' hangs on encrypted dataset Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other

As part of looking into a minor issue with the group listed when using runat(1) on a UFS filesystem for Johannes (my Google Summer of Code student work on new basic file privs), I discovered an even bigger issue with UFS and extended attributes. I''ve cc''d ZFS discuss because I used ZFS as the comparison and I believe that ZFS is acting correctly but even then it might not be

I have a coworker, who''s primary expertise is in another flavor of Unix. This coworker lists floating point operations as one of ZFS detriments. I''s not really sure what he means specifically, or where he got this reference from. In an effort to refute what I believe is an error or misunderstanding on his part, I have spent time on Yahoo, Google, the ZFS section of

I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this: rpool rpool/ROOT/osol-112 rpool/export rpool/export/home rpool/export/home/reader you could do a shapshot encompassing everything below zpool instead of having to do it at each level. (Maybe it was in a dream...)