similar to: ZFS root ARC memory usage on VxFS system...

> ZFS 11.0 on Solaris release 06/06, hangs systems when > trying to copy files from my VXFS 4.1 file system. > any ideas what this problem could be?. What kind of system is that? How much memory is installed? I''m able to hang an Ultra 60 with 256 MByte of main memory, simply by writing big files to a ZFS filesystem. The problem happens with both Solaris 10 6/2006 and Solaris

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

Has anyone had any experience with samba on a Solaris 2.6 system using vxfs file system?

Hello all, I have a question. Below are two ::memstat outputs about 5 days apart. The interesting thing is the "anonymous" memory shows 2GB, though the two major hogs of that memory (two MySQL instances) claim to be consuming about 6.2GB (checked via pmap). Also, it seems like the ARC keeps creeping the kernel memory over the 4GB limit I set for the ARC (zfs_arc_max). What I was also,

We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

I would appreciate if somebody can clarify a few points. I am doing some random WRITES (100% writes, 100% random) testing and observe that ARC grows way beyond the "hard" limit during the test. The hard limit is set 512 MB via /etc/system and I see the size going up to 1 GB - how come is it happening? mdb''s ::memstat reports 1.5 GB used - does this include ARC as well or is

Hello experts, We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging. Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU (disk staging). The customer would like to know if it is best to use ZFS or VxFS as file system inside Netbackup disk staging in order to get the best performance possible. Could you provide some information regarding this

We have a 32 GB RAM server running about 14 zones. There are multiple databases, application servers, web servers, and ftp servers running in the various zones. I understand that using ZFS will increase kernel memory usage, however I am a bit concerned at this point. root at servername:~/zonecfg #mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace uppc pcplusmp ufs md mpt ip indmux ptm

Whats the default size of the file system cache for Solaris 10 x86 and can it be tuned? I read various posts on the subject and its confusing.. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi Pete, > https://reviews.llvm.org/D36331 Congratulations! > Following shortly: > * Clang driver and target triple support. great, then it is able to generate ELF by $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/clang -c --target=arc hello.c -o hello.o -mmcu=XXX and do you plan to implement ARC target for lld[1]? it is a good testcase: flash them directly to the chip[2], or simulator[3]. 1. ARC

Hi Pete, Thanks for your kind response! I migrated AVR target for lld https://reviews.llvm.org/D32991 it is very beginning, only support R_AVR_CALL reloc, and ARC is more complex than AVR, I will learn it from binutils, also ARC related doc, then try to implement it. 发自我的iPhone ------------------ Original ------------------ From: Pete Couperus <Peter.J.Couperus at synopsys.com> Date:

Hello everyone, I'm trying to compile my test.cpp for ARC, using this guide https://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html. I've built my LLVM+CLANG with ARC, ARM and X86. clang -target arc -S test.cpp Gives me: error: unknown target triple 'arc', please use -triple or -arch clang -targer arm works fine Is there any way to compile for ARC? -------------- next part

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The arc driver uses empty implementations for its encoders. Replace > the code with the generic simple encoder. We should , as a follow-up patch, embed the encoder in arcgpu_drm_private. Then we drop the kzalloc() and avoid that life-time challenge. This patch looks good for what it does. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam

Oh, that's what I was afraid of. So there is definetly no way to compile for ARC? If so, should I write ARC.h(.cpp) in lib/Basic/Targets in order to make it work? чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 14:47, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 12:41, Павел Безбородов via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > clang -target

Recently we have started using Arc serve backup. The Arc server and the tape library are connected to a Windows 2000 server machine and the data files are stored on many Samba file servers. I have Linux Client Agents installed on all Linux Machine. Now the problem is that when Arc Serve backup the file it always backup the full files irrespective of setting for a differential backup. I think

Recently we have started using Arc serve backup. The Arc server and the tape library are connected to a Windows 2000 server machine and the data files are stored on many Samba file servers. I have Linux Client Agents installed on all Linux Machine. Now the problem is that when Arc Serve backup the file it always backup the full files irrespective of setting for a differential backup. I think

Hi all, The Phabricator docs seem to say that downloading a patch goes with `arc patch`. However, I tried it on several revisions and they all fail with: Checking patch some/path/to/a/file/that/exists ... error: some/path/to/a/file/that/exists: does not exist in index With the svn repo I found that command to be really useful. But now it seems like I have to download the patch manually, create

I've gone through Code Reviews with Phabriactor[1], Arcanist Quick Start[2] and Arcanist User Guide arc diff[3]. But I'm unable to setup reviewers my editor pops up and there is a "Reviewers:" line and but I'm unable email addresses directly. It seems it wants reviewers passed on the command line or some how in .arcconfig. But I haven't been able to find any